IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2410-d504618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facebook Data as Part of Cultural Heritage Investments Toolbox: Pilot Analysis of Users Interests and Preferences Concerning Adaptive Reuse

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska

    (Robert Zajonc Institute for Social Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Anna Domaradzka

    (Robert Zajonc Institute for Social Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Bartosz Ślosarski

    (Robert Zajonc Institute for Social Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Agata Żbikowska

    (Robert Zajonc Institute for Social Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

The growing popularity of social media data brings questions about its accuracy and usefulness for a wide array of cultural heritage projects, often lacking data sources crucial for better planning and implementation. In this paper, we are studying the opportunities offered by the freely available Facebook Ads Manager data on target group sizes in different locations. We conducted a small experiment and a pilot survey to verify if Facebook data concerning its users’ interests is accurate and could be used to facilitate the implementation of projects in the field of adaptive reuse. Despite all discovered limitations of this approach, we point out how Facebook data, along with other social media outlets, can be used to extract some strategic information and add to the socio-cultural assessment toolbox. As such, this type of data could be of use to local leaders planning activities and investments around cultural heritage sites. We also posit that such data can facilitate benefit transfer between cities through better understanding of local preferences and values-orientations.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Anna Domaradzka & Bartosz Ślosarski & Agata Żbikowska, 2021. "Facebook Data as Part of Cultural Heritage Investments Toolbox: Pilot Analysis of Users Interests and Preferences Concerning Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2410-:d:504618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2410/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2410/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecilia Pasquinelli & Mariapina Trunfio & Nicola Bellini & Simona Rossi, 2021. "Sustainability in Overtouristified Cities? A Social Media Insight into Italian Branding Responses to Covid-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Ewa Glińska & Wawrzyniec Rudolf, 2019. "City Brand Personality Projected by Municipalities from Central and Eastern Europe Countries—A Comparison of Facebook Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Kaitlin Kish, 2020. "Paying Attention: Big Data and Social Advertising as Barriers to Ecological Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Robert J. Johnston & Randall S. Rosenberger, 2010. "Methods, Trends And Controversies In Contemporary Benefit Transfer," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 479-510, July.
    5. Masoomali Fatehkia & Dan O’Brien & Ingmar Weber, 2019. "Correlated impulses: Using Facebook interests to improve predictions of crime rates in urban areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Elena-Mădălina Teodor & Doina Fotache & Magdalena Danileţ, 2019. "Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Patrizia Riganti & Peter Nijkamp, 2005. "Benefit transfers of cultural heritage values - how far can we go?," ERSA conference papers ersa05p186, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Xiaoxu Liang & Yanjun Lu & John Martin, 2021. "A Review of the Role of Social Media for the Cultural Heritage Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Quan Li & Wenbo Wei & Nian Xiong & Daici Feng & Xinyue Ye & Yongsheng Jiang, 2017. "Social Media Research, Human Behavior, and Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Theodora A. Maniou, 2021. "Semantic Analysis of Cultural Heritage News Propagation in Social Media: Assessing the Role of Media and Journalists in the Era of Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Giusy Pappalardo, 2020. "Community-Based Processes for Revitalizing Heritage: Questioning Justice in the Experimental Practice of Ecomuseums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Teodoro Luque Martínez & Luis Doña Toledo & Nina Faraoni, 2019. "Auditing Marketing and the Use of Social Media at Ski Resorts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yubo Shao & Jamal Rizal Razali & Hasmadi Hassan & Bo Pan, 2023. "A Study on the Influencing Factors of Social Media in the Communication of Cultural Heritage Education: A Systematic Literature Review," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(7), pages 90-104, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taylor, Michael H. & Rollins, Kimberly, 2012. "Using Ecological Models to Coordinate Valuation of Ecological Change on Western Rangelands for ex post Application to Policy Analysis," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9.
    2. Eleni Kilipiri & Eugenia Papaioannou & Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou, 2023. "Social Media and Influencer Marketing for Promoting Sustainable Tourism Destinations: The Instagram Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Nuria Huete-Alcocer & Miguel Ángel Valero-Tévar, 2021. "Impact of Information Sources on Promoting Tourism in a Rural Region: The Case of the Roman Villa of Noheda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Hermine Vedogbeton & Robert J. Johnston, 2020. "Commodity Consistent Meta-Analysis of Wetland Values: An Illustration for Coastal Marsh Habitat," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 835-865, April.
    5. Moeltner, Klaus, 2019. "Bayesian nonlinear meta regression for benefit transfer," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 44-62.
    6. Xiaonan Wang & Licheng Wang & Jianping Chen & Shouting Zhang & Paolo Tarolli, 2020. "Assessment of the External Costs of Life Cycle of Coal: The Case Study of Southwestern China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Ewa Zawojska & Zbigniew Szkop & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Tomasz Żylicz, 2016. "Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by the Wilanów Park: A benefit transfer study," Working Papers 2016-31, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    8. Rolfe, John & Windle, Jill & Bennett, Jeffrey W. & Mazur, Kasia, 2013. "Calibration of values in benefit transfer to account for variations in geographic scale and scope: Comparing two choice modelling experiments," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152176, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Newbold, Stephen C. & Johnston, Robert J., 2020. "Valuing non-market valuation studies using meta-analysis: A demonstration using estimates of willingness-to-pay for water quality improvements," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Robert Turner, 2013. "Using contingent choice surveys to inform national park management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 120-138, June.
    11. Abbie A. Rogers & Fiona L. Dempster & Jacob I. Hawkins & Robert J. Johnston & Peter C. Boxall & John Rolfe & Marit E. Kragt & Michael P. Burton & David J. Pannell, 2019. "Valuing non-market economic impacts from natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1131-1161, November.
    12. de Groot, Rudolf & Brander, Luke & van der Ploeg, Sander & Costanza, Robert & Bernard, Florence & Braat, Leon & Christie, Mike & Crossman, Neville & Ghermandi, Andrea & Hein, Lars & Hussain, Salman & , 2012. "Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 50-61.
    13. Windle, Jill & Rolfe, John, 2013. "The limitations of applying benefit transfer to assess the value of ecosystem services in a “generic” peri-urban, coastal town in Australia," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152183, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Matthew Burlingame & Dennis Guignet & Matthew Heberling & Michael Papenfus, 2023. "Using Benefit Transfer to Estimate Housing Value Increases from Improved Water Clarity," Working Papers 23-07, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    15. Laith T. Khrais, 2020. "Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Consumer Demand in E-Commerce," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Häggquist, Elisabeth & Söderholm, Patrik, 2015. "The economic value of geological information: Synthesis and directions for future research," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 91-100.
    17. Umar Ali Bukar & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rozi Nor Haizan Nor & Salfarina Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Mustafa Alabadla & Ali Alkhalifah, 2022. "How Advanced Technological Approaches Are Reshaping Sustainable Social Media Crisis Management and Communication: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Jongwon Won & Jong Yoon Lee & Jong Woo Jun, 2020. "Influences of SNS (Social Network Service) Uses and Musical Consumption on City Branding: A Focus on Broadway, New York and the West End, London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, May.
    19. Ismail Badache & Adrian-Gabriel Chifu & Sébastien Fournier, 2022. "Unsupervised and Supervised Methods to Estimate Temporal-Aware Contradictions in Online Course Reviews," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Schaafsma, Marije & Brouwer, Roy & Liekens, Inge & De Nocker, Leo, 2014. "Temporal stability of preferences and willingness to pay for natural areas in choice experiments: A test–retest," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 243-260.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2410-:d:504618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.