IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2095-d500089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Influence of Stump-Removal on Components of Hemiboreal Pine Forest Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts Čakšs

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Linda Čakša

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Iveta Desaine

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
    “Skogssallskapet” SIA, LV-4101 Cēsis, Latvia)

  • Zane Lībiete

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Didzis Elferts

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
    Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)

  • Aldis Butlers

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Āris Jansons

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “SILAVA”, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

Abstract

Use of whole tree biomass becomes increasingly more important due to rising demand for renewable energy and materials to replace fossil resources. Therefore, assessment of influence of this approach on hemiboreal forest ecosystem is essential. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term influence of full biomass removal (FBR) on the ground vegetation and soil chemical composition in Scots pine stands. Study sites were located in Vacciniosa , Myrtillosa , and Myrtillosa mel. forest types. Almost half a century from the FBR, it had no notable or significant influence on number of ground vegetation species. Significant differences in overall vegetation composition between stands established after FBR and conventional harvesting (stem-wood removal) were not found by the detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM). In addition, values of Ellenberg and Düll indicators were similar and, in most cases (determined by forest type and parameter), had no significant differences between FBR and the same age control stands. Similarly, no significant differences were found between these stands in soil carbon and nitrogen pools. Thus, there had not been a negative long-term effect of FBR on the hemiboreal Scots pine ecosystem as indicated by ground vegetation and soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts Čakšs & Linda Čakša & Iveta Desaine & Zane Lībiete & Didzis Elferts & Aldis Butlers & Āris Jansons, 2021. "Long-Term Influence of Stump-Removal on Components of Hemiboreal Pine Forest Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2095-:d:500089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evelyne Thiffault & Ariane Béchard & David Paré & Darren Allen, 2015. "Recovery rate of harvest residues for bioenergy in boreal and temperate forests: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(5), pages 429-451, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Yajuan & Zhang, Lijin & Wang, Huan & Wang, Yueyao & Ding, Jiaqi & Shen, Jiashu & Wang, Zheng & Liu, Yinglu & Liang, Chenyu & Li, Shuangcheng, 2022. "Reconstructing deforestation patterns in China from 2000 to 2019," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Bentsen, Niclas Scott, 2017. "Carbon debt and payback time – Lost in the forest?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1211-1217.
    3. van den Oever, A.E.M. & Costa, D. & Messagie, M., 2023. "Prospective life cycle assessment of alternatively fueled heavy-duty trucks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. Weiwei Wang, 2022. "Agricultural and Forestry Biomass for Meeting the Renewable Fuel Standard: Implications for Land Use and GHG Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Ghaffariyan, Mohammad Reza & Brown, Mark & Acuna, Mauricio & Sessions, John & Gallagher, Tom & Kühmaier, Martin & Spinelli, Raffaele & Visser, Rien & Devlin, Ger & Eliasson, Lars & Laitila, Juha & Lai, 2017. "An international review of the most productive and cost effective forest biomass recovery technologies and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 145-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2095-:d:500089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.