IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1938-d497626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Renewable Technology Integration for Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings within the Re-COGNITION Project

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Mancò

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Elisa Guelpa

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Alessandro Colangelo

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Alessandro Virtuani

    (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Tommaso Morbiato

    (WindCity Srl, 38068 Rovereto, Italy)

  • Vittorio Verda

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

With the 2010/31/EU directive, all new buildings shall be nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB) from 2020 onward, with the aim of strongly reducing the energy consumption related to the building sector. To achieve this goal, it is not sufficient to focus on the design of the building envelope; smart and efficient energy management is necessary. Moreover, to ensure the adoption of RES systems in the built environment, innovative technologies need to be further developed in order to increase their cost-effectiveness, energy efficiency and integration capability. This paper proposes a synthesis, design and operation optimization of an integrated multi-energy system composed of traditional and innovative renewable technologies, developed within the European project Re-COGNITION. A biogas-based micro cogeneration unit, lightweight glass-free photovoltaic modules, a passive variable geometry small wind turbine optimized for an urban environment and latent heat thermal storage based on phase change materials are some of the technologies developed within the Re-COGNITION project. The optimization problem is solved to contemporarily evaluate (a) the optimal design and (b) the optimal operations of the set of technologies considering both investment and operating costs, using mixed integer non-linear programming. The optimization is applied to the four pilots that are developed during the project, in various European cities (Turin (Italy), Corby (United Kingdom), Thessaloniki (Greece), Cluj-Napoca (Romania). Simulation results show that the development and optimal exploitation of new technologies through optimization strategies provide significant benefits in terms of cost (between 11% and 42%) and emissions (between 10% and 25%), managing building import/export energy and charge/discharge storage cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Mancò & Elisa Guelpa & Alessandro Colangelo & Alessandro Virtuani & Tommaso Morbiato & Vittorio Verda, 2021. "Innovative Renewable Technology Integration for Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings within the Re-COGNITION Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1938-:d:497626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashouri, Araz & Fux, Samuel S. & Benz, Michael J. & Guzzella, Lino, 2013. "Optimal design and operation of building services using mixed-integer linear programming techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 365-376.
    2. Méndez Echenagucia, Tomás & Capozzoli, Alfonso & Cascone, Ylenia & Sassone, Mario, 2015. "The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 577-591.
    3. Strantzali, Eleni & Aravossis, Konstantinos, 2016. "Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 885-898.
    4. Diakaki, Christina & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kabelis, Nikos & Kolokotsa, Dionyssia & Kalaitzakis, Kostas & Stavrakakis, George, 2010. "A multi-objective decision model for the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5483-5496.
    5. Lu, Yuehong & Wang, Shengwei & Sun, Yongjun & Yan, Chengchu, 2015. "Optimal scheduling of buildings with energy generation and thermal energy storage under dynamic electricity pricing using mixed-integer nonlinear programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 49-58.
    6. Zhang, Sheng & Huang, Pei & Sun, Yongjun, 2016. "A multi-criterion renewable energy system design optimization for net zero energy buildings under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 654-665.
    7. Arcuri, P. & Florio, G. & Fragiacomo, P., 2007. "A mixed integer programming model for optimal design of trigeneration in a hospital complex," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1430-1447.
    8. Eicker, Ursula & Pietruschka, Dirk & Haag, Maximilian & Schmitt, Andreas, 2015. "Systematic design and analysis of solar thermal cooling systems in different climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 827-836.
    9. Mazzoni, Stefano & Ooi, Sean & Nastasi, Benedetto & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2019. "Energy storage technologies as techno-economic parameters for master-planning and optimal dispatch in smart multi energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    10. Zakeri, Behnam & Syri, Sanna, 2015. "Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 569-596.
    11. Shaterabadi, Mohammad & Jirdehi, Mehdi Ahmadi & Amiri, Nima & Omidi, Sina, 2020. "Enhancement the economical and environmental aspects of plus-zero energy buildings integrated with INVELOX turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1355-1367.
    12. Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2019. "Coordinated optimal design of zero/low energy buildings and their energy systems based on multi-stage design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Perera, A.T.D. & Attalage, R.A. & Perera, K.K.C.K. & Dassanayake, V.P.C., 2013. "Designing standalone hybrid energy systems minimizing initial investment, life cycle cost and pollutant emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 220-230.
    14. Maria Ferrara & Valentina Monetti & Enrico Fabrizio, 2018. "Cost-Optimal Analysis for Nearly Zero Energy Buildings Design and Optimization: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    15. Kheiri, Farshad, 2018. "A review on optimization methods applied in energy-efficient building geometry and envelope design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 897-920.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Bragolusi & Chiara D’Alpaos, 2021. "The Willingness to Pay for Residential PV Plants in Italy: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    2. Luerssen, Christoph & Gandhi, Oktoviano & Reindl, Thomas & Sekhar, Chandra & Cheong, David, 2020. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of PV-powered cooling systems with thermal energy and battery storage for off-grid applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Fernandes, Marco S. & Rodrigues, Eugénio & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Costa, José J. & Gomes, Álvaro, 2019. "The impact of thermal transmittance variation on building design in the Mediterranean region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 581-597.
    4. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    5. Huang, Pei & Wu, Hunjun & Huang, Gongsheng & Sun, Yongjun, 2018. "A top-down control method of nZEBs for performance optimization at nZEB-cluster-level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 891-904.
    6. Gruber, J.K. & Huerta, F. & Matatagui, P. & Prodanović, M., 2015. "Advanced building energy management based on a two-stage receding horizon optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 194-205.
    7. Lešnik, Maja & Kravanja, Stojan & Premrov, Miroslav & Žegarac Leskovar, Vesna, 2020. "Optimal design of timber-glass upgrade modules for vertical building extension from the viewpoints of energy efficiency and visual comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Chai, Jiale & Huang, Pei & Sun, Yongjun, 2019. "Investigations of climate change impacts on net-zero energy building lifecycle performance in typical Chinese climate regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 176-189.
    9. Deng, Na & Cai, Rongchang & Gao, Yuan & Zhou, Zhihua & He, Guansong & Liu, Dongyi & Zhang, Awen, 2017. "A MINLP model of optimal scheduling for a district heating and cooling system: A case study of an energy station in Tianjin," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1750-1763.
    10. Huang, Pei & Sun, Yongjun, 2019. "A collaborative demand control of nearly zero energy buildings in response to dynamic pricing for performance improvements at cluster level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 911-921.
    11. Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Laura Gabrielli & Massimiliano Scarpa, 2020. "Energy Retrofit in European Building Portfolios: A Review of Five Key Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-38, September.
    12. Zhan, Jin & He, Wenjing & Huang, Jianxiang, 2024. "Comfort, carbon emissions, and cost of building envelope and photovoltaic arrangement optimization through a two-stage model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    13. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    14. Luo, Na & Hong, Tianzhen & Li, Hui & Jia, Ruoxi & Weng, Wenguo, 2017. "Data analytics and optimization of an ice-based energy storage system for commercial buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 459-475.
    15. Ciardiello, Adriana & Rosso, Federica & Dell'Olmo, Jacopo & Ciancio, Virgilio & Ferrero, Marco & Salata, Ferdinando, 2020. "Multi-objective approach to the optimization of shape and envelope in building energy design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. Seung Hyo Baek & Byung Hee Lee, 2019. "Optimal Decision-Making of Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings in the Early Design Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Wakui, Tetsuya & Kawayoshi, Hiroki & Yokoyama, Ryohei, 2016. "Optimal structural design of residential power and heat supply devices in consideration of operational and capital recovery constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 118-133.
    18. Mallikarjun, Sreekanth & Lewis, Herbert F., 2014. "Energy technology allocation for distributed energy resources: A strategic technology-policy framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 783-799.
    19. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 37-68.
    20. Wang, Ni & Heijnen, Petra W. & Imhof, Pieter J., 2020. "A multi-actor perspective on multi-objective regional energy system planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1938-:d:497626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.