IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13520-d696737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Disciplinary Assessment of Napier Grass Plantation on Local Energetic, Environmental and Socioeconomic Industries: A Watershed-Scale Study in Southern Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Kotchakarn Nantasaksiri

    (Division of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan)

  • Patcharawat Charoen-amornkitt

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Takashi Machimura

    (Division of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan)

  • Kiichiro Hayashi

    (Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan)

Abstract

Napier grass is an energy crop that is promising for future power generation. Since Napier grass has never been planted extensively, it is important to understand the impacts of Napier grass plantations on local energetic, environmental, and socioeconomic features. In this study, the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model was employed to investigate the impacts of Napier grass plantation on runoff, sediment, and nitrate loads in Songkhla Lake Basin (SLB), southern Thailand. Historical data, collected between 2009 and 2018 from the U-tapao gaging station located in SLB were used to calibrate and validate the model in terms of precipitation, streamflow, and sediment. The simulated precipitation, streamflow, and sediment showed agreement with observed data, with the coefficients of determination being 0.791, 0.900, and 0.997, respectively. Subsequently, the SWAT model was applied to evaluate the impact of land use change from the baseline case to Napier grass plantation cases in abandoned areas with four different nitrogen fertilizer application levels. The results revealed that planting Napier grass decreased the average surface runoff and sediment in the watershed. A multidisciplinary assessment supporting future decision making was conducted using the results obtained from the SWAT model; these showed that Napier grass will provide enhanced benefits to hydrology and water quality when nitrogen fertilizers of 0 and 125 kgN ha −1 were applied. On the other hand, the benefits to the energy supply, farmer’s income, and CO 2 reduction were highest when a nitrogen fertilization of 500 kgN ha −1 was applied. Nonetheless, planting Napier grass should be supported since it increases the energy supply and creates jobs while also reducing surface runoff, sediment yield, nitrate load, and CO 2 emission.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotchakarn Nantasaksiri & Patcharawat Charoen-amornkitt & Takashi Machimura & Kiichiro Hayashi, 2021. "Multi-Disciplinary Assessment of Napier Grass Plantation on Local Energetic, Environmental and Socioeconomic Industries: A Watershed-Scale Study in Southern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13520-:d:696737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haas, Marcelo B. & Guse, Björn & Pfannerstill, Matthias & Fohrer, Nicola, 2015. "Detection of dominant nitrate processes in ecohydrological modeling with temporal parameter sensitivity analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 314(C), pages 62-72.
    2. Sahar Shahpari & Janelle Allison & Matthew Tom Harrison & Roger Stanley, 2021. "An Integrated Economic, Environmental and Social Approach to Agricultural Land-Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Li, Jing & Zhang, Zelie & Jin, Xianfeng & Chen, Jiaquan & Zhang, Shaojia & He, Zong & Li, Sheng & He, Zhiming & Zhang, Haipeng & Xiao, He, 2018. "Exploring the socioeconomic and ecological consequences of cash crop cultivation for policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 46-57.
    4. Kotchakarn Nantasaksiri & Patcharawat Charoen-Amornkitt & Takashi Machimura, 2021. "Land Potential Assessment of Napier Grass Plantation for Power Generation in Thailand Using SWAT Model. Model Validation and Parameter Calibration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Njakou Djomo, S. & Ac, A. & Zenone, T. & De Groote, T. & Bergante, S. & Facciotto, G. & Sixto, H. & Ciria Ciria, P. & Weger, J. & Ceulemans, R., 2015. "Energy performances of intensive and extensive short rotation cropping systems for woody biomass production in the EU," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 845-854.
    6. Wipa Prapinagsorn & Sureewan Sittijunda & Alissara Reungsang, 2017. "Co-Digestion of Napier Grass and Its Silage with Cow Dung for Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Wipa Prapinagsorn & Sureewan Sittijunda & Alissara Reungsang, 2017. "Co-Digestion of Napier Grass and Its Silage with Cow Dung for Bio-Hydrogen and Methane Production by Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Anna Vatsanidou & Christos Kavalaris & Spyros Fountas & Nikolaos Katsoulas & Theofanis Gemtos, 2020. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass Production from Energy Crops in Crop Rotation Using Different Tillage System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Janina Piekutin & Monika Puchlik & Michał Haczykowski & Katarzyna Dyczewska, 2021. "The Efficiency of the Biogas Plant Operation Depending on the Substrate Used," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinayak Laxman Pachapur & Prianka Kutty & Preetika Pachapur & Satinder Kaur Brar & Yann Le Bihan & Rosa Galvez-Cloutier & Gerardo Buelna, 2019. "Seed Pretreatment for Increased Hydrogen Production Using Mixed-Culture Systems with Advantages over Pure-Culture Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Guoqiang Wang & Feng Wang & Bohong Chen, 2020. "Performance Study on Methanol Steam Reforming Rib Micro-Reactor with Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Katarzyna Ignatowicz & Gabriel Filipczak & Barbara Dybek & Grzegorz Wałowski, 2023. "Biogas Production Depending on the Substrate Used: A Review and Evaluation Study—European Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Xinhua Shen & Raghava R. Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2015. "The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Haizhen Su & Fenggui Liu & Haifeng Zhang & Xiaofan Ma & Ailing Sun, 2024. "Progress and Prospects of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Hu, Shougeng & Xiao, Renbin & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Functional transition of cultivated ecosystems: Underlying mechanisms and policy implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Xinyi Li & Xiong Wang & Xiaoqing Song, 2021. "Impacts of Agricultural Capitalization on Regional Paddy Field Change: A Production-Factor Substitution Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Okura, Fumi & Budiasa, I Wayan & Kato, Tasuku, 2022. "Exploring a Balinese irrigation water management system using agent-based modeling and game theory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. Zhaoliang Li & Minghao Jin & Jianwei Cheng, 2021. "Economic growth of green agriculture and its influencing factors in china: Based on emergy theory and spatial econometric model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15494-15512, October.
    10. Wenyao Jin & Xiaochen Xu & Fenglin Yang, 2018. "Application of Rumen Microorganisms for Enhancing Biogas Production of Corn Straw and Livestock Manure in a Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Digestion System: Performance and Microbial Community Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Ioannis Lemonidis & Dimitra C. Banti & Christos A. Tzenos & Sotirios D. Kalamaras & Thomas A. Kotsopoulos & Petros Samaras, 2022. "Energy Valorization of Fine Screenings from a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Pereira, S. & Costa, M., 2017. "Short rotation coppice for bioenergy: From biomass characterization to establishment – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1170-1180.
    13. Kang, Yating & Yang, Qing & Bartocci, Pietro & Wei, Hongjian & Liu, Sylvia Shuhan & Wu, Zhujuan & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Haiping & Fantozzi, Francesco & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    14. Rugani, Benedetto & Golkowska, Katarzyna & Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Koster, Daniel & Benetto, Enrico & Verdonckt, Pieter, 2015. "Simulation of environmental impact scores within the life cycle of mixed wood chips from alternative short rotation coppice systems in Flanders (Belgium)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 449-464.
    15. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Andreas Otto Wagner & Nina Lackner & Mira Mutschlechner & Eva Maria Prem & Rudolf Markt & Paul Illmer, 2018. "Biological Pretreatment Strategies for Second-Generation Lignocellulosic Resources to Enhance Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Livingstone, David & Smyth, Beatrice M. & Lyons, Gary & Foley, Aoife M. & Murray, Simon T. & Johnston, Chris, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of a short-rotation coppice willow riparian buffer strip for farm nutrient mitigation and renewable energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Mulya, Setyardi Pratika & Hudalah, Delik & Prilandita, Niken, 2024. "Developing a new methodology for determining typologies of peri-urban agriculture: A case study of the Jakarta Bandung Mega Urban Region Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Bushra Ahmed Alhammad & Mahmoud F. Seleiman & Matthew Tom Harrison, 2023. "Hydrogen Peroxide Mitigates Cu Stress in Wheat," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Feedstock Security Analysis for Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13520-:d:696737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.