IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13228-d691145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

People Prefer Greener Corridors: Evidence from Linking the Patterns of Tree and Shrub Diversity and Users’ Preferences in Lisbon’s Green Corridors

Author

Listed:
  • Juscidalva Rodrigues de Almeida

    (Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Reginaldo de Oliveira Nunes

    (Department of Human and Social Sciences, Federal University of Rondônia Foundation, Ji-Paraná 76906-656, RO, Brazil)

  • Teresa Dias

    (Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Despite its importance as a component of urban green spaces, as far as we are aware no study has focused on plant diversity in urban green corridors (GCs). Therefore, this study aimed at: (i) characterizing tree and shrub communities in Lisbon’s GCs and (ii) assessing whether GCs’ users value trees and shrubs. We counted Lisbon’s GCs users in the same places where we assessed the tree and shrub community. Along the nine GCs, we observed trees and shrubs belonging to 70 species, distributed across 35 families with most (≥50%) species and plants being trees, exotic, pollinated by insects, with fruit dispersion by animals, evergreen leaves, and producing dry fruits. Most GCs had a similar number of users (20–30 users h −1 survey −1 ) except for those of Central and Ribeirinho, which were more frequented (60 and 100 users h −1 survey −1 , respectively). Most users (≥50%) were adults, walking accompanied, and performing leisure activities. Finally, the number of users was shown to be influenced by: (i) tree and shrub relative abundance, confirming that users preferred greener corridors; and (ii) function(s), showing that users preferred the most multifunctional GCs (i.e., GCs fulfilling ecological, cultural, and recreational functions). Our data suggest that Lisbon’s GCs favor more the inclusion of citizens than ecological functionality and resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Juscidalva Rodrigues de Almeida & Reginaldo de Oliveira Nunes & Teresa Dias, 2021. "People Prefer Greener Corridors: Evidence from Linking the Patterns of Tree and Shrub Diversity and Users’ Preferences in Lisbon’s Green Corridors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13228-:d:691145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuemin Shi & Mingzhou Qin & Bin Li & Dan Zhang, 2021. "A Framework for Optimizing Green Infrastructure Networks Based on Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juscidalva Rodrigues de Almeida & Gustavo Benedito Medeiros Alves & Reginaldo de Oliveira Nunes & Teresa Dias, 2022. "Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xichen Ge & Liang Sun & Jiongzhen Chen & Shuangrong Cai, 2022. "Land Utilization, Landscape Pattern, and Ecological Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Discrimination and Overlap from Suining, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Yang Li & Xiaotong Zhang & Xiuxiu Gao, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Coupling Coordination Degree of an Urban Economy–Society–Environment System Based on a Multi-Scenario Analysis: The Case of Chengde City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Qidi Dong & Linjia Wu & Jun Cai & Di Li & Qibing Chen, 2022. "Construction of Ecological and Recreation Patterns in Rural Landscape Space: A Case Study of the Dujiangyan Irrigation District in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Mingyuan Chang & Longyang Huang & Tianlin Zhai & Jiawei Zhu & Yuanbo Ma & Ling Li & Chenchen Zhao, 2023. "A Challenge of Sustainable Urbanization: Mapping the Equity of Urban Public Facilities in Multiple Dimensions in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Anastasia Nikologianni & Alessandro Betta & Alessandro Gretter, 2022. "Contribution of Conceptual-Drawing Methods to Raise Awareness on Landscape Connectivity: Socio-Environmental Analysis in the Regional Context of Trentino (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Federica Isola & Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2022. "Strengthening a Regional Green Infrastructure through Improved Multifunctionality and Connectedness: Policy Suggestions from Sardinia, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13228-:d:691145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.