IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12932-d685287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE for Market Risk Assessment of New-Build River Cruises on the Yangtze River

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhu

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Haiyan Wang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Biwen Xu

    (Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200000, China)

Abstract

Cruise tourism on the Yangtze River Basin has developed rapidly in recent years. However, it is still facing such challenges as homogenization of itinerary and shore attraction arrangement, as well as aging cruise ships and simplification of service facilities, while it is also difficult to satisfy hierarchical and personalized tourist needs. To change such circumstances, new-build river cruise ships are inevitable. Complexity of market supply and demand environment, together with variability of tourist preferences, have increased market uncertainties of new-build cruise products. This study aims to assess market risks of new-build river cruise ships first by identifying risk factors, from the perspective of supply and demand under the actual conditions of the Yangtze River cruise market, then by evaluating potential impacts, caused by risk factors based on multi-criteria decision-making considerations. Fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE was employed to prioritize the risk factors. The results reveal that among the most significant market risk factors are the following, in sequence: backwardness of support facilities; sudden security crisis; homogenization of cruise products; simplification of tourism route design; and inadequate management of the tourism market. Such findings will provide beneficial insights for strategic and sustainable development of river cruises on the Yangtze River.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhu & Haiyan Wang & Biwen Xu, 2021. "Using Fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE for Market Risk Assessment of New-Build River Cruises on the Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12932-:d:685287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cavallaro, Fausto & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Streimikiene, Dalia & Mardani, Abbas, 2019. "Assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies based on a modified intuitionistic fuzzy topsis and trigonometric entropy weights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 258-270.
    2. Albadvi, Amir & Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2007. "Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 673-683, March.
    3. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans & Philippe Vincke, 1986. "How to select and how to rank projects: the Prométhée method," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9307, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Brans, J. P. & Vincke, Ph. & Mareschal, B., 1986. "How to select and how to rank projects: The method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 228-238, February.
    5. Chen, Ching-Fu & Chen, Fu-Shian, 2010. "Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 29-35.
    6. Hung, Kam & Petrick, James F., 2011. "Why do you cruise? Exploring the motivations for taking cruise holidays, and the construction of a cruising motivation scale," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 386-393.
    7. Safaei Mohamadabadi, H. & Tichkowsky, G. & Kumar, A., 2009. "Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 112-125.
    8. Wan, Chengpeng & Yan, Xinping & Zhang, Di & Qu, Zhuohua & Yang, Zaili, 2019. "An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 222-240.
    9. Mateus, Ricardo & Ferreira, J.A. & Carreira, Joao, 2008. "Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 1-18, May.
    10. António Luís Silvestre & Carlos M. Santos & Carla Ramalho, 2008. "Satisfaction and Behavioural Intentions of Cruise Passengers Visiting the Azores," Tourism Economics, , vol. 14(1), pages 169-184, March.
    11. Kasiri, Leila Agha & Guan Cheng, Kenny Teoh & Sambasivan, Murali & Sidin, Samsinar Md., 2017. "Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 91-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neofytou, H. & Nikas, A. & Doukas, H., 2020. "Sustainable energy transition readiness: A multicriteria assessment index," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Coker, Alexander D., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 278-296.
    3. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi, 2009. "Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5484-5493, December.
    4. Luis C. Dias & Carolina Passeira & João Malça & Fausto Freire, 2022. "Integrating life-cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis to compare alternative biodiesel chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1359-1374, May.
    5. Emre Çalişkan & Erdem Aksakal & Saliha Çetinyokuş & Tahsin Çetinyokuş, 2019. "Hybrid Use of Likert Scale-Based AHP and PROMETHEE Methods for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) Software Selection," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1689-1715, September.
    6. María Dolores Benítez-Márquez & Guillermo Bermúdez-González & Eva María Sánchez-Teba & Elena Cruz-Ruiz, 2021. "Exploring the Antecedents of Cruisers’ Destination Loyalty: Cognitive Destination Image and Cruisers’ Satisfaction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Spiros Mouzakitis & George Karamolegkos & Emmanouil Ntanos & John Psarras, 2013. "A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Outranking Approach in Support of Business Angels’ Decision-Analysis Process for the Assessment of Companies as Investment Opportunities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 274-283, July.
    8. Mohammad Nikoo & Nafise Khorramshokouh & Shahryar Monghasemi, 2015. "Optimal Design of Detention Rockfill Dams Using a Simulation-Based Optimization Approach with Mixed Sediment in the Flow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(15), pages 5469-5488, December.
    9. Anjali Singh & Anjana Gupta & Aparna Mehra, 2017. "Energy planning problems with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 821-848, October.
    10. Tsuen-Ho Hsu & Ling-Zhong Lin, 2014. "Using Fuzzy Preference Method for Group Package Tour Based on the Risk Perception," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 299-323, March.
    11. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    12. Panos Xidonas & Ilias Lekkos & Charis Giannakidis & Christos Staikouras, 2023. "Multicriteria security evaluation: does it cost to be traditional?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 301-330, April.
    13. Zhang, Long & Yu, Jing & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Ren, Jingzheng, 2017. "Measuring energy security performance within China: Toward an inter-provincial prospective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 825-836.
    14. Schwartz, Michael & Göthner, Maximilian, 2009. "A Novel Approach to Incubator Evaluations: The PROMETHEE Outranking Procedures," IWH Discussion Papers 1/2009, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    15. Goswami Shankha Shubhra, 2020. "Outranking Methods: Promethee I and Promethee II," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 93-110, January.
    16. Chatzinikolaou, Parthena & Manos, Basil D. & Bournaris, Thomas, 2012. "Classification of rural areas in Europe using social sustainability indicators," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124104, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    17. Spiros Mouzakitis & George Karamolegkos & Emmanouil Ntanos & John Psarras, 2011. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Outranking Approach in Support of Business Angels’ Decision Analysis Process for the Assessment of Companies as Investment Opportunities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 156-165, July.
    18. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    19. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    20. Guh, Yuh-Yuan, 1997. "Introduction to a new weighting method -- Hierarchy consistency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 215-226, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12932-:d:685287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.