IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12705-d680932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Economic Theory, Presented in Basic Academic Textbooks, Applicable to the Digital Economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Vujica Lazovic

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Biljana Rondovic

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Danijela Lazovic

    (Central Bank of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Tamara Djurickovic

    (Agency for Control and Quality Assurance of Higher Education, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

Abstract

With the aim of improving modern methods for educating economists, the authors in this paper impose the following topics: What do we want to teach students, and do we teach them the right things? How transformative are our fundamental textbook bases to offer the new knowledge that the digital economy imposes? Bearing in mind previous questions, the aim of this paper is to highlight the gap that exists between economic theory and economic practice in terms of insufficient theoretical scope of the digital economy (DE) and its study, and DE’s increasing participation in global practice as an economy based on innovation and new technologies. In the analysis, the authors concentrate on two levels: (1) they analyse the specifics of DE and in that context, they evaluate the applicability of traditional economic theory; (2) they review the representation of DE in university textbooks. Based on the results, the authors conclude that DE possesses specific attributes, and it is necessary to include these as mandatory lessons in university textbooks on the level of basic studies. They suggest some areas for which economic theory should be better explained and supplemented in future research (proposing appropriate guidelines for future efforts in theoretical work). Moreover, through a systematic literature review, the authors approach 90 basic university textbooks in economics and by analysing their content, they prove that DE is not sufficiently represented in them. The results of the paper suggest that economics textbooks, and thus the curricula of basic studies, should be supplemented with chapters on the digital economy, which will affect the modernization and adequacy of theory with practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Vujica Lazovic & Biljana Rondovic & Danijela Lazovic & Tamara Djurickovic, 2021. "Is Economic Theory, Presented in Basic Academic Textbooks, Applicable to the Digital Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12705-:d:680932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayoub Yousefi, 2011. "The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: evidence from developed and developing countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 581-596, November.
    2. Davidson,Lawrence S. & Hauskrecht,Andreas & von Hagen,Jürgen, 2020. "Macroeconomics for Business," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108470858, September.
    3. Dixit, Avinash, 2014. "Microeconomics: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199689378.
    4. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    5. Robert J. Gordon, 2000. "Does the "New Economy" Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 49-74, Fall.
    6. Watanabe, Chihiro & Naveed, Kashif & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "Measuring GDP in the digital economy: Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 226-240.
    7. David Colander, 2015. "Why economics textbooks should, but don't, and won't, change," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 229-235, September.
    8. John Quiggin, 2014. "National accounting and the digital economyy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 136-142.
    9. William D. Ferguson, 2011. "Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century: Recent Advances in Economic Theory and Undergraduate Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 31-50, January.
    10. repec:cup:cbooks:9781108747660 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    12. Rosemarie Fike & James Gwartney, 2015. "Public Choice, Market Failure, and Government Failure in Principles Textbooks," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 207-218, April.
    13. Burda, Michael & Wyplosz, Charles, 2017. "Macroeconomics: a European Text," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 7, number 9780198737513.
    14. Rinaldo Evangelista & Paolo Guerrieri & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 802-824, November.
    15. Poul Thøis Madsen, 2013. "The Financial Crisis and Principles of Economics Textbooks," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 197-216, September.
    16. Watanabe, Chihiro & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "A new paradox of the digital economy - Structural sources of the limitation of GDP statistics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 9-23.
    17. Jane S. Lopus & Lynn Paringer, 2011. "The Principles of Economics Textbook: Content Coverage and Usage," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 28, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Hoover,Kevin D., 2015. "Applied Intermediate Macroeconomics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107436824, September.
    19. Derek Pyne, 2007. "Does the Choice of Introductory Microeconomics Textbook Matter?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 279-296, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vujica Lazović & Milorad Jovović & Tamara Backović & Tamara Djuričković & Biljana Rondović, 2022. "Is Digital Economy a Good Samaritan to Developing Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vujica Lazović & Milorad Jovović & Tamara Backović & Tamara Djuričković & Biljana Rondović, 2022. "Is Digital Economy a Good Samaritan to Developing Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Olsson, Ola, 2001. "Why Does Technology Advance in Cycles?," Working Papers in Economics 38, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    3. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    4. Tou, Yuji & Watanabe, Chihiro & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2020. "Fusion of technology management and financing management - Amazon's transformative endeavor by orchestrating techno-financing systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Madsen, Jakob B., 2007. "Technology spillover through trade and TFP convergence: 135 years of evidence for the OECD countries," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 464-480, July.
    6. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    7. Christos N. Pitelis, 2011. "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
    9. Raouf Boucekkine & David de la Croix & Yiannis Vailakis, 2002. "Technological Shocks and IT Revolutions," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 68(1), pages 75-89.
    10. Charles Shaaba Saba & Nicholas Ngepah, 2022. "ICT Diffusion, Industrialisation and Economic Growth Nexus: an International Cross-country Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2030-2069, September.
    11. Clark, Gregory, 2014. "The Industrial Revolution," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 217-262, Elsevier.
    12. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2011. "Innovációvezérelt növekedés? [Innovation-driven growth?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 460-476.
    13. Nicholas Crafts & Mary O'Mahony, 2001. "A perspective on UK productivity performance," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 271-306, September.
    14. Thomas Anderson, 2001. "Changing Patterns and Determinants of Growth," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(03), pages 23-28, October.
    15. Raéf Bahrini & Alaa A. Qaffas, 2019. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Economic Growth: Evidence from Developing Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Idrissa Yaya Diandy & Alioune Badara Seck, 2021. "Infrastructures physiques et croissance économique en Afrique de l'Ouest: Le rôle des institutions," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 154-165, March.
    17. Boyer, Robert, 2001. "La "nouvelle économie" au futur antérieur : histoire, théories, géographie," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 0113, CEPREMAP.
    18. Horii, Ryo, 2012. "Wants and past knowledge: Growth cycles with emerging industries," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 220-238.
    19. Claude Diebolt & Catherine Kyrtsou, 2006. "Non-Linear Perspectives for Population and Output Dynamics: New Evidence for Cliometrics," Working Papers 06-02, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    20. Nyström, Kristina, 2015. "Pre- and post-entrepreneurship labor mobility of entrepreneurs and employees in entrepreneurial firms," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 420, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12705-:d:680932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.