IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12447-d676651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reconfiguration of Urban Public–Private Spaces in the Mall: False Security, Antidemocratization, and Apoliticalization

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Alfonso Escudero Gómez

    (Department of Geography, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

Abstract

In cities across the world, public spaces are being reconfigured, and their functions are being appropriated by private areas, such as shopping malls. The aim of the present article was to analyze this problem and, more specifically, to study shopping centers as secure spaces in cities, as well as the antidemocratic and apolitical nature of such malls. The study takes a positivist approach, beginning with the existing theoretical framework and using data from case studies to generate findings. The theoretical framework is established through a review of the literature, while the case study data are drawn from an analysis of news content from digital media and from autoethnography. The findings suggest malls are perceived as safe spaces, also in addition to being home to minor offenses, as well as a number of tragic events and crimes. Additionally, a growing number of demonstrations and political acts are being staged inside malls, which are seen as symbols of consumption and the neoliberal capitalist system. The owners and managers of shopping centers condone and permit the least conflictive acts and ban and repress the remainder, on occasions with the support of state security forces. The relocation of civic life to malls reduces the use of public spaces and erodes the value of the public sphere. The article ends by proposing public actions to reverse this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Alfonso Escudero Gómez, 2021. "The Reconfiguration of Urban Public–Private Spaces in the Mall: False Security, Antidemocratization, and Apoliticalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12447-:d:676651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12447/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12447/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fujie Rao & Kim Dovey, 2021. "Shopping and Urbanity: Emerging Assemblages of Main Street, Mall, and Power Centre," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 747-764, October.
    2. Ash Amin, 2008. "Collective culture and urban public space," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Escudero-Gómez, Luis Alfonso, 2024. "Shopping centers challenging decline: Competitive strategies in three case studies from Madrid's urban area," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regan Koch & Alan Latham, 2013. "On the Hard Work of Domesticating a Public Space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(1), pages 6-21, January.
    2. Cameron McAuliffe, 2013. "Legal Walls and Professional Paths: The Mobilities of Graffiti Writers in Sydney," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 518-537, February.
    3. Lise Mahieus & Eugene McCann, 2023. "“Hot+Noisy” Public Space: Conviviality, “Unapologetic Asianness,” and the Future of Vancouver’s Chinatown," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 77-88.
    4. Francesca Froy, 2023. "Learning from architectural theory about how cities work as complex and evolving spatial systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 495-510.
    5. Alison L. Bain & Julie A. Podmore, 2020. "Scavenging for LGBTQ2S Public Library Visibility on Vancouver’s Periphery," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(4), pages 601-615, September.
    6. Carmela Cucuzzella & Morteza Hazbei & Sherif Goubran, 2021. "Activating Data through Eco-Didactic Design in the Public Realm: Enabling Sustainable Development in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    7. Talja Blokland & Robert Vief & Daniela Krüger & Henrik Schultze, 2023. "Roots and routes in neighbourhoods. Length of residence, belonging and public familiarity in Berlin, Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1949-1967, August.
    8. Deborah Leslie & Norma Rantisi & Shannon Black, 2024. "Mobilizing space to realize the transformative potential of work integration social enterprises through a politics of scale and scope," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(4), pages 1024-1044, June.
    9. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2018. "Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the ‘divided city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3454-3473, November.
    10. Eva Youkhana, 2015. "A Conceptual Shift in Studies of Belonging and the Politics of Belonging," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 10-24.
    11. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    12. Massimo Bricocoli & Benedetta Marani & Stefania Sabatinelli, 2022. "The Spaces of Social Services as Social Infrastructure: Insights From a Policy-Innovation Project in Milan," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 381-397.
    13. Qin Li & Shaomin Peng & Zonghao Chen & Han Du & Yijun Liu & Wenlong Li, 2024. "Resilience Evaluation and Renovation Strategies of Public Spaces in Old Communities from a Disaster-Adaptive Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Alena Coblence & Luděk Sýkora, 2022. "THE PERFORMATIVITY OF METROPOLIZATION: How Material‐Discursive Practices Institutionalize the Prague Metropolitan Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 502-521, July.
    15. Zengwei Xu & Shanshan Miao, 2022. "Effect of Public Space on Collective Action for Rural Waste Management and the Mediating Effects of Social Capital," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Slade, Jason & Inch, Andy & Crookes, Lee, 2021. "Building infrastructures for inclusive regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Misagh Mottaghi & Mattias Kärrholm & Catharina Sternudd, 2020. "Blue-Green Solutions and Everyday Ethicalities: Affordances and Matters of Concern in Augustenborg, Malmö," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 132-142.
    18. Louise Sträuli & Wojciech Kębłowski, 2023. "‘The gates of paradise are open’: Contesting and producing publicness in the Brussels metro through fare evasion," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3126-3142, November.
    19. Naomi Smith & Peter Walters, 2018. "Desire lines and defensive architecture in modern urban environments," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2980-2995, October.
    20. Casper Laing Ebbensgaard, 2020. "Standardised difference: Challenging uniform lighting through standards and regulation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(9), pages 1957-1976, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12447-:d:676651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.