IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12102-d670664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Management of Transboundary Groundwater Resources: Past and Future

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Golovina

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 21st Line 2, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Svetlana Pasternak

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 21st Line 2, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Pavel Tsiglianu

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 21st Line 2, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Nikolay Tselischev

    (Department of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 21st Line 2, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Groundwater resources at all times have provided and continue to provide a significant impact on the economic, social, and often political activities of any state, especially if the reserves of this strategic resource are limited. Coordinated groundwater resources management is one of the main conditions for the sustainable development of countries’ transboundary basins, affecting all aspects of human activity, including water supply, agriculture, industry, hydropower, water transport, environment, and the very quality of human life. Modern international trends in the field of transboundary groundwater resources management is undergoing significant changes. This article dwells upon the features of groundwater as a mineral, the structure of state groundwater management in the Russian Federation, the regulation of transboundary groundwater use, and protection at the international and domestic levels are analyzed. The system of management of the transboundary aquifers of Kazakhstan and Belarus is considered in more detail. The unitization approach used for coordinated development of oil and gas fields can, to some extent, serve as a model for managing common groundwater aquifers located on the border of neighboring states. Dogmatic and comparative legal methods consisting of analyzing the applicable legal regulations on the use and protection of groundwater were used. Several recommendations for improving the system of state sustainable management of groundwater resources at the global level are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Golovina & Svetlana Pasternak & Pavel Tsiglianu & Nikolay Tselischev, 2021. "Sustainable Management of Transboundary Groundwater Resources: Past and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12102-:d:670664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatyana Ponomarenko & Marina Nevskaya & Oksana Marinina, 2020. "An Assessment of the Applicability of Sustainability Measurement Tools to Resource-Based Economies of the Commonwealth of Independent States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Tatiana Ponomarenko & Marina Nevskaya & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2021. "Mineral Resource Depletion Assessment: Alternatives, Problems, Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Marian J. Neal, 2020. "COVID-19 and water resources management: reframing our priorities as a water sector," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 435-440, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emiliia Iakovleva & Margarita Belova & Amilcar Soares & Anton Rassõlkin, 2022. "On the Issues of Spatial Modeling of Non-Standard Profiles by the Example of Electromagnetic Emission Measurement Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Tatiana Ponomarenko & Eugene Marin & Sergey Galevskiy, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Oil and Gas Projects: Justification of Engineering Solutions in the Implementation of Field Development Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Yury Valeryevich Ilyushin & Ekaterina Ivanovna Kapostey, 2023. "Developing a Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Aluminium Production in a Soderberg Electrolyser," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Ivan Lange & Pavel Kotiukov & Yana Lebedeva, 2023. "Analyzing Physical-Mechanical and Hydrophysical Properties of Sandy Soils Exposed to Long-Term Hydrocarbon Contamination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kostas Bithas & Panos Kalimeris, 2022. "Coupling versus Decoupling? Challenging Evidence over the Link between Economic Growth and Resource Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Syeda Tayyaba Ijaz & Sumayya Chughtai, 2022. "The Impact of Financial, Economic and Environmental Factors on Energy Efficiency, Intensity, and Dependence: The Moderating Role of Governance and Institutional Quality," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 15-31, July.
    3. Tatyana Ponomarenko & Oksana Marinina & Marina Nevskaya & Kristina Kuryakova, 2021. "Developing Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Oil and Gas Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Myroslava Bublyk & Agnieszka Kowalska-Styczeń & Vasyl Lytvyn & Victoria Vysotska, 2021. "The Ukrainian Economy Transformation into the Circular Based on Fuzzy-Logic Cluster Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Elena N. Shaforostova & Olga V. Kosareva-Volod’ko & Olga V. Belyankina & Danila Y. Solovykh & Ekaterina S. Sazankova & Elena I. Sizova & Danila A. Adigamov, 2023. "A Tailing Dump as Industrial Deposit; Study of the Mineralogical Composition of Tailing Dump of the Southern Urals and the Possibility of Tailings Re-Development," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Emiliia Iakovleva & Margarita Belova & Amilcar Soares, 2020. "Specific Features of Mapping Large Discontinuous Faults by the Method of Electromagnetic Emission," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Yang, Xiao & Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Yusop, Zulkornain & Abbas, Shujaat & Khan, Muhammad Azhar & Zaman, Khalid, 2022. "Volatility in mineral resource pricing causes ecological footprints: A cloud on the horizon," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Dogan, Eyup & Majeed, Muhammad Tariq & Luni, Tania, 2022. "Revisiting the nexus of ecological footprint, unemployment, and renewable and non-renewable energy for South Asian economies: Evidence from novel research methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1060-1070.
    9. Cheynesh B. Kongar-Syuryun & Alexander V. Aleksakhin & Evgeniya N. Eliseeva & Anna V. Zhaglovskaya & Roman V. Klyuev & Denis A. Petrusevich, 2023. "Modern Technologies Providing a Full Cycle of Geo-Resources Development," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Jianguo, Du, 2023. "Examining challenges and solutions for environmental and natural resource management with a focus on mineral resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    11. Di Vaio, Assunta & Trujillo, Lourdes & D'Amore, Gabriella & Palladino, Rosa, 2021. "Water governance models for meeting sustainable development Goals:A structured literature review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Oksana Marinina & Anna Tsvetkova & Yurii Vasilev & Nadejda Komendantova & Anna Parfenova, 2022. "Evaluating the Downstream Development Strategy of Oil Companies: The Case of Rosneft," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Ilinova, Alina & Dmitrieva, Diana & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2021. "Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on fertilizer companies: The role of competitive advantages," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Louis Lebel & Hap Navy & Phoummixay Siharath & Chau Thi Minh Long & Nilar Aung & Phimphakan Lebel & Chu Thai Hoanh & Boripat Lebel, 2023. "COVID-19 and household water insecurities in vulnerable communities in the Mekong Region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3503-3522, April.
    15. Lidija Đurđevac Ignjatović & Vesna Krstić & Vlastimir Radonjanin & Violeta Jovanović & Mirjana Malešev & Dragan Ignjatović & Vanja Đurđevac, 2022. "Application of Cement Paste in Mining Works, Environmental Protection, and the Sustainable Development Goals in the Mining Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Elena Katysheva, 2023. "Analysis of the Interconnected Development Potential of the Oil, Gas and Transport Industries in the Russian Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Sarah Bunney & Elizabeth Lawson & Sarah Cotterill & David Butler, 2021. "Water Resource Management: Moving from Single Risk-Based Management to Resilience to Multiple Stressors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak, 2020. "Socio-Environmental Vulnerability Assessment for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-5, September.
    19. Olexandr Yemelyanov & Anastasiya Symak & Tetyana Petrushka & Olena Vovk & Oksana Ivanytska & Dmytro Symak & Anatolii Havryliak & Taras Danylovych & Lilia Lesyk, 2021. "Criteria, Indicators, and Factors of the Sustainable Energy-Saving Economic Development: The Case of Natural Gas Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12102-:d:670664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.