IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11890-d666191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Perspective on Remote On-Line Teaching and Learning at the University of Latvia in the First and Second COVID-19 Period

Author

Listed:
  • Sanita Baranova

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology, and Art, University of Latvia, LV1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Dita Nīmante

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology, and Art, University of Latvia, LV1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Daiga Kalniņa

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology, and Art, University of Latvia, LV1083 Riga, Latvia)

  • Alise Oļesika

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology, and Art, University of Latvia, LV1083 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

In Spring 2020, due to the rapid spread of COVID-19, all educational institutions in Latvia, including the University of Latvia (UL), transitioned from face-to-face on-site learning to remote learning. After a short period of face-to-face on-site learning in autumn, UL returned to remote learning in November for the second time. This paper investigates the UL students’ perspectives on remote teaching and learning at the UL during the first and second COVID-19 periods. The research assesses several remote study organization aspects, including the lecturer’s and student’s digital skills, their access to information and support during the study process, planning and implementation of the study process, and students’ acquisition of the content. The study used an original questionnaire designed in the Spring 2020 semester. Seven questions from the first questionnaire were included in another follow-up questionnaire distributed in the Spring 2021 semester. A total of 2248 UL students from the Spring 2020 semester and 742 students from the Spring 2021 semester participated in the study, representing 13 faculties across all study levels. The survey responses were collected via a QuestionPro survey platform and then downloaded into an IBM SPSS 28 file for a reliability check. Next, descriptive statistical analyses were conducted for each reported survey item using Microsoft Excel 2016. The research presented here implies that, in general, students perceive positive improvements in almost all the investigated aspects of the organization of the remote study process when comparing the first and second COVID-19 periods, which could indicate a certain level of resilience in students and university lecturers when subject to COVID circumstances. However, the results reveal that students have, in one year, developed a more realistic approach in assessing their digital skills. The results lead us to believe that remote on-line learning is not just a short-term solution but could become a valuable element for providing qualitative education in the long term. It could indicate that the students and lecturers at university are ready for new and sustainable higher education study organization solutions in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanita Baranova & Dita Nīmante & Daiga Kalniņa & Alise Oļesika, 2021. "Students’ Perspective on Remote On-Line Teaching and Learning at the University of Latvia in the First and Second COVID-19 Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11890-:d:666191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnese Slišāne & Gatis Lāma & Zanda Rubene, 2021. "Self-Assessment of the Entrepreneurial Competence of Teacher Education Students in the Remote Study Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eri Ota & Rie Murakami-Suzuki, 2022. "Effects of Online Problem-Based Learning to Increase Global Competencies for First-Year Undergraduate Students Majoring in Science and Engineering in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiyuan Xiang & Jing Wang & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang, 2022. "Improving the Entrepreneurial Competence of College Social Entrepreneurs: Digital Government Building, Entrepreneurship Education, and Entrepreneurial Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11890-:d:666191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.