IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11225-d654049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Usability Study of Classical Mechanics Education Based on Hybrid Modeling: Implications for Sustainability in Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Rosanna E. Guadagno

    (Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Virgilio Gonzenbach

    (School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Haley Puddy

    (School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Paul Fishwick

    (School of Arts, Technology, and Emerging Communication, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Midori Kitagawa

    (School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Mary Urquhart

    (School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Michael Kesden

    (School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Ken Suura

    (School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Baily Hale

    (School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Cenk Koknar

    (School of Arts, Technology, and Emerging Communication, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Ngoc Tran

    (Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Rong Jin

    (Computer Science Department, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA)

  • Aniket Raj

    (Computer Information Technology Department, Lonestar College, Houston, TX 77088, USA)

Abstract

A usability study evaluated the ease with which users interacted with an author-designed modeling and simulation program called STEPP (Scaffolded Training Environment for Physics Programming). STEPP is a series of educational modules for introductory algebra-based physics classes that allow students to model the motion of an object using Finite State Machines (FSMs). STEPP was designed to teach students to decompose physical systems into a few key variables such as time, position, and velocity and then encourages them to use these variables to define states (such as running a marathon) and transitions between these states (such as crossing the finish line). We report the results of a usability study on high school physics teachers that was part of a summer training institute. To examine this, 8 high school physics teachers (6 women, 2 men) were taught how to use our simulation software. Data from qualitative and quantitative measures revealed that our tool generally exceeded teacher’s expectations across questions assessing: (1) User Experience, (2) STEM-C Relevance, and (3) Classroom Applicability. Implications of this research for STEM education and the use of modeling and simulation to enhance sustainability in learning will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosanna E. Guadagno & Virgilio Gonzenbach & Haley Puddy & Paul Fishwick & Midori Kitagawa & Mary Urquhart & Michael Kesden & Ken Suura & Baily Hale & Cenk Koknar & Ngoc Tran & Rong Jin & Aniket Raj, 2021. "A Usability Study of Classical Mechanics Education Based on Hybrid Modeling: Implications for Sustainability in Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11225-:d:654049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11225/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11225/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Das, Saikat & Bose, Indranil & Sarkar, Uttam Kumar, 2023. "Predicting the outbreak of epidemics using a network-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 819-831.
    2. Thomas Vempiliyath & Maitri Thakur & Vincent Hargaden, 2021. "Development of a Hybrid Simulation Framework for the Production Planning Process in the Atlantic Salmon Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. André Ferreira & Ana L. Ramos & José V. Ferreira & Luís P. Ferreira, 2024. "Simulation of Hospital Waste Supply Chain in the Context of Industry 4.0—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    5. Carayannis, Elias G. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Wurth, Bernd, 2022. "OR for entrepreneurial ecosystems: A problem-oriented review and agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 791-808.
    6. Ruiz-Meza, José & Montoya-Torres, Jairo R., 2022. "A systematic literature review for the tourist trip design problem: Extensions, solution techniques and future research lines," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    7. Irene M. W. Niks & Guido A. Veldhuis & Marianne H. J. van Zwieten & Teun Sluijs & Noortje M. Wiezer & Heleen M. Wortelboer, 2022. "Individual Workplace Well-Being Captured into a Literature- and Stakeholders-Based Causal Loop Diagram," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Mielczarek, Bożena & Zabawa, Jacek, 2021. "Modelling demographic changes using simulation: Supportive analyses for socioeconomic studies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Martin Kunc, 2021. "A commentary on Lustick and Tetlock 2021," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), June.
    10. McGarraghy, Seán & Olafsdottir, Gudrun & Kazakov, Rossen & Huber, Élise & Loveluck, William & Gudbrandsdottir, Ingunn Y. & Čechura, Lukáš & Esposito, Gianandrea & Samoggia, Antonella & Aubert, Pierre-, 2022. "Conceptual system dynamics and agent-based modelling simulation of interorganisational fairness in food value chains: Research agenda and case studies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2).
    11. Monks, Thomas & Harper, Alison, 2023. "Computer model and code sharing practices in healthcare discrete-event simulation: a systematic scoping review," OSF Preprints c4ytf, Center for Open Science.
    12. Jeff Scales, 2020. "A design science research approach to closing the gap between the research and practice of project scheduling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 804-812, September.
    13. Yvonne Kummer & Christian Fikar & Johanna Burtscher & Martina Strobl & Reinhard Fuchs & Konrad J. Domig & Patrick Hirsch, 2022. "Facilitating Resilience during an African Swine Fever Outbreak in the Austrian Pork Supply Chain through Hybrid Simulation Modelling," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Tippong, Danuphon & Petrovic, Sanja & Akbari, Vahid, 2022. "A review of applications of operational research in healthcare coordination in disaster management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 1-17.
    15. Gao, Jiayang & Xu, Xianglong & Zhang, Tao, 2024. "Forecasting the development of Clean energy vehicles in large Cities: A system dynamics perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. Seán McGarraghy & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Rossen Kazakov & Élise Huber & William Loveluck & Ingunn Y. Gudbrandsdottir & Lukáš Čechura & Gianandrea Esposito & Antonella Samoggia & Pierre-Marie Aubert & Da, 2022. "Conceptual System Dynamics and Agent-Based Modelling Simulation of Interorganisational Fairness in Food Value Chains: Research Agenda and Case Studies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, February.
    17. Roberto Aringhieri & Patrick Hirsch & Marion S. Rauner & Melanie Reuter-Oppermanns & Margit Sommersguter-Reichmann, 2022. "Central European journal of operations research (CJOR) “operations research applied to health services (ORAHS) in Europe: general trends and ORAHS 2020 conference in Vienna, Austria”," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, March.
    18. De Bock, Koen W. & Coussement, Kristof & Caigny, Arno De & Słowiński, Roman & Baesens, Bart & Boute, Robert N. & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Delen, Dursun & Kraus, Mathias & Lessmann, Stefan & Maldonado, Sebast, 2024. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A defining framework, methods, applications, and a research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 249-272.
    19. Penny R. Breeze & Hazel Squires & Kate Ennis & Petra Meier & Kate Hayes & Nik Lomax & Alan Shiell & Frank Kee & Frank de Vocht & Martin O’Flaherty & Nigel Gilbert & Robin Purshouse & Stewart Robinson , 2023. "Guidance on the use of complex systems models for economic evaluations of public health interventions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1603-1625, July.
    20. Shoaib, Mohd & Mustafee, Navonil & Madan, Karan & Ramamohan, Varun, 2023. "Leveraging multi-tier healthcare facility network simulations for capacity planning in a pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11225-:d:654049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.