IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10928-d648033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Restaurants ASSessment (GRASS): A Tool for Evaluation and Classification of Restaurants Considering Sustainability Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Dayanne da Costa Maynard

    (Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Renata Puppin Zandonadi

    (Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Eduardo Yoshio Nakano

    (Department of Statistics, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • António Raposo

    (CBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho

    (Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

Abstract

Green restaurants are based on the implementation of environmental management and are closely related to quality management through a set of instruments and programs. This study aimed to build an instrument classification adopting cutoff points and classify restaurants using traffic light scores from the sustainability assessment checklist validated in Brazilian Portuguese for restaurants. The questionnaire classification validation was performed using a cross-sectional study conducted in a convenience sample of 97 restaurants. The instrument has 76 items, and all items were based on yes/no/not applicable answers, comparing sustainability activities. The instrument score was obtained by assigning one point to each “yes” item. Each section received a score, and a total score was provided to the restaurant from the three sections’ sum. International instruments used in the checklist development stage were checked to assist in the cutoff points determination. Therefore, the score for restaurants with low adherence to sustainable practices or red seal ranges from 0 to 40%, restaurants with medium adherence to sustainable practices or yellow seal from 40% > to <75%, and restaurants with good adherence to sustainable practices or green seal ≥75%. The instrument is divided into three sections (1. water, energy, and gas supply; 2. menu and food waste; 3. waste reduction, construction materials, chemicals, employees, and social sustainability). Percentages must be reached in all sections. Researchers did not find any green or sustainable restaurants through the checklist application in the tested sample, and 47.4% of the restaurants had the yellow seal (presenting sustainable activities) with higher scores for Section 2 regarding menu and food waste. The items less scored were the company has goals for the rational use of water, the company achieves zero greenhouse gas emissions with proven partnerships, the company has a documented program to reduce carbon emissions, and towels or uniforms are made of organic or sustainable material. Thus, it demonstrates the attention points and improvements in the analyzed restaurants. We hope that the construction and validation of the checklist and its score’s determination have contributed to broadening the discussions on sustainability in food services and serve as a starting point for future research. Strategies like these are fundamental to improve the understanding of the subject and to expand the knowledge of nutritionists who deal directly with this economic sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & António Raposo & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2021. "Green Restaurants ASSessment (GRASS): A Tool for Evaluation and Classification of Restaurants Considering Sustainability Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10928-:d:648033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marzena Tomaszewska & Beata Bilska & Agnieszka Tul-Krzyszczuk & Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska, 2021. "Estimation of the Scale of Food Waste in Hotel Food Services—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Berill Takacs & Aiduan Borrion, 2020. "The Use of Life Cycle-Based Approaches in the Food Service Sector to Improve Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Maria Hatjiathanassiadou & Sthephany Rayanne Gomes de Souza & Josimara Pereira Nogueira & Luciana de Medeiros Oliveira & Virgílio José Strasburg & Priscilla Moura Rolim & Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Sea, 2019. "Environmental Impacts of University Restaurant Menus: A Case Study in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Sustainability Indicators in Restaurants: The Development of a Checklist," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Dimitris Karagiannis & Meletios Andrinos, 2021. "The Role of Sustainable Restaurant Practices in City Branding: The Case of Athens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Mayara Daré Vidigal & Priscila Farage & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability Indicators Applied to Food Services: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Yi-Man Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Di-Man Huang, 2014. "The Influence of Green Restaurant Decision Formation Using the VAB Model: The Effect of Environmental Concerns upon Intent to Visit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    9. Yi Shan Yu & Min Luo & Dong Hong Zhu, 2018. "The Effect of Quality Attributes on Visiting Consumers’ Patronage Intentions of Green Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Yi-Man Teng & Kun-Shan Wu, 2019. "Sustainability Development in Hospitality: The Effect of Perceived Value on Customers’ Green Restaurant Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuying Huang & C. Michael Hall, 2023. "Locality in the Promoted Sustainability Practices of Michelin-Starred Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arun T. M. & Puneet Kaur & Alberto Ferraris & Amandeep Dhir, 2021. "What motivates the adoption of green restaurant products and services? A systematic review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2224-2240, May.
    2. Codruța Adina Băltescu & Nicoleta Andreea Neacșu & Anca Madar & Dana Boșcor & Alexandra Zamfirache, 2022. "Sustainable Development Practices of Restaurants in Romania and Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Sustainability Indicators in Restaurants: The Development of a Checklist," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Marek Zborowski & Anna Mikulec, 2022. "Dietary Catering: The Perfect Solution for Rational Food Management in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Kumju Hwang & Bora Lee & Juhee Hahn, 2020. "Green Restaurant Consumers’ Pride and Social Healthy Narcissism Influencing Self-Actualization and Self-Transcendence That Drive Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Farzana Riva & Solon Magrizos & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel & Ioannis Rizomyliotis, 2022. "Green consumerism, green perceived value, and restaurant revisit intention: Millennials' sustainable consumption with moderating effect of green perceived quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2807-2819, November.
    7. Ingrid C. Fideles & Rita de Cassia Coelho de Almeida Akutsu & Priscila R. F. Costa & Jamacy Costa-Souza & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho & Renata Puppin Zandonadi, 2020. "Brazilian Community Restaurants’ Low-Income Food Handlers: Association between the Nutritional Status and the Presence of Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Yen-Cheng Chen & Hsiang-Chun Lin, 2020. "Exploring Effective Sensory Experience in the Environmental Design of Sustainable Cafés," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Yi-Man Teng & Kun-Shan Wu, 2019. "Sustainability Development in Hospitality: The Effect of Perceived Value on Customers’ Green Restaurant Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Giovana Vitória Nunes Leite Duarte & Susana Pereira Antunes Procópio & Angélica Cotta Lobo Leite Carneiro & Leandro de Morais Cardoso, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Sustainable Social Practices in Food Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Yuying Huang & C. Michael Hall, 2023. "Locality in the Promoted Sustainability Practices of Michelin-Starred Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Zakaria Elkhwesky & Islam Elbayoumi Salem & Michal Varmus & Haywantee Ramkissoon, 2022. "Sustainable practices in hospitality pre and amid COVID‐19 pandemic: Looking back for moving forward post‐COVID‐19," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1426-1448, October.
    13. Akkhaporn Kokkhangplu & Wanida Onlamai & Tananat Chokpreedapanich & Kraisak Phikul, 2023. "What Predicts Behavioral Intention in Eco-Friendly Hotels? The Roles of Tourist’s Perceived Value and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem, 2023. "Promoting Sustainable Food Practices in Food Service Industry: An Empirical Investigation on Saudi Arabian Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Patcharaporn Mahasuweerachai & Chompoonut Suttikun, 2022. "The Effect of Green Self-Identity on Perceived Image, Warm Glow and Willingness to Purchase: A New Generation’s Perspective towards Eco-Friendly Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Magdy El-Sayed Hashish & Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Shaimaa Abo Khangar Mohamed & Ahmed Saleh Abo Elenain & Wagih Salama, 2022. "The Nexus between Green Perceived Quality, Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, and Customers’ Green Behavioral Intentions in Eco-Friendly Hotels: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Castro, P. & Pedroso, R. & Lautenbach, S. & Vicens, R., 2020. "Farmland abandonment in Rio de Janeiro: Underlying and contributory causes of an announced development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2020. "Changes in Dairy Products Value Chain in Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    20. Birgit Kopainsky & Anita Frehner & Adrian Müller, 2020. "Sustainable and healthy diets: Synergies and trade‐offs in Switzerland," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 908-927, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10928-:d:648033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.