IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10745-d644572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Ecological Benefits of Recycling Multiple Metals from Lithium Battery Saggars Based on Emergy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbiao Zhang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Zehong Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Shaopeng Li

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Suocheng Dong

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Bing Xia

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Chunying Wang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of China’s new energy industry, the use of lithium-ion batteries has increased sharply, and the demand for battery cathode metals such as nickel, cobalt, and manganese has also increased rapidly. Scrapped ceramic saggars that are used to produce the cathode materials of lithium-ion batteries contain large amounts of nickel, cobalt, and manganese compounds; thus, recycling these saggars has high economic value and ecological significance. In this paper, the emergy method is used to analyze the ecological benefits of the typical Ni–Co-containing saggar recycling process in China. This paper constructs an ecoefficiency evaluation index for industrial systems based on emergy analysis to analyze the recycling of nickel and cobalt saggars. The ecological benefits are analyzed, and the following conclusions are drawn. (1) The Ni–Co-containing saggar recycling production line has good economic and ecological benefits. (2) The process has room for improvement in the energy use efficiency and clean energy use of the crystallization process and the efficiency of chemical use in the cascade separation and purification process. This study also establishes a set of emergy analysis methods and indicator system for the evaluation of the ecological benefit of the recycling industry, which can provide a reference for the evaluation of the eco-economic benefit of similar recycling industry processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbiao Zhang & Zehong Li & Shaopeng Li & Suocheng Dong & Bing Xia & Chunying Wang, 2021. "Evaluation of the Ecological Benefits of Recycling Multiple Metals from Lithium Battery Saggars Based on Emergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10745-:d:644572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tao Li & Yimiao Song & Jing Shen, 2019. "Clean Power Dispatching of Coal-Fired Power Generation in China Based on the Production Cleanliness Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Kirti Richa & Callie W. Babbitt & Gabrielle Gaustad, 2017. "Eco-Efficiency Analysis of a Lithium-Ion Battery Waste Hierarchy Inspired by Circular Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 715-730, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Niculina Alexandra Grigore, 2023. "Circular Economy Approaches for Electrical and Conventional Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    4. Harper, Gavin D.J. & Kendrick, Emma & Anderson, Paul A. & Mrozik, Wojciech & Christensen, Paul & Lambert, Simon & Greenwood, David & Das, Prodip K. & Ahmeid, Mohamed & Milojevic, Zoran & Du, Wenjia & , 2023. "Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118420, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Maria Symeonidou & Agis M. Papadopoulos, 2022. "Selection and Dimensioning of Energy Storage Systems for Standalone Communities: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Zehong Li & Zhenhua Sun & Wenbiao Zhang & Shaopeng Li, 2023. "Environmental Impact of the Recycling of Ni-Co-Containing Saggars—A LCA Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    7. E. Sardianou & V. Nikou & K. Evangelinos & I. Nikolaou, 2024. "What are the key dimensions that CE emphasizes on? A systematic analysis of circular economy definitions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 547-562, September.
    8. K. E. K. Vimal & Ming-Lang Tseng & Samanyu Raju & Mahesh Cherukuri & Amith Ashwithi & Jayakrishna Kandasamy, 2022. "Circular function deployment: a novel mathematical model to identify design factors for circular economy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9068-9101, July.
    9. Aleksandra Wewer & Pinar Bilge & Franz Dietrich, 2021. "Advances of 2nd Life Applications for Lithium Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles Based on Energy Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Xia Wang & Lijun Zhang & Yaochen Qin & Jingfei Zhang, 2020. "Analysis of China’s Manufacturing Industry Carbon Lock-In and Its Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Jani Das, 2022. "Comparative life cycle GHG emission analysis of conventional and electric vehicles in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13294-13333, November.
    12. Maarten Koese & Carlos F. Blanco & Vicente B. Vert & Martina G. Vijver, 2023. "A social life cycle assessment of vanadium redox flow and lithium‐ion batteries for energy storage," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 223-237, February.
    13. Lei Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Beibei Pang & Bingxiang Sun & Ari Kokko, 2020. "Second Use Value of China’s New Energy Vehicle Battery: A View Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Bing Xia & Suocheng Dong & Yu Li & Zehong Li & Dongqi Sun & Wenbiao Zhang & Wenlong Li, 2021. "Evolution Characters and Influencing Factors of Regional Eco-Efficiency in a Developing Country: Evidence from Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Armaghan Chizaryfard & Cali Nuur & Paolo Trucco, 2022. "Managing Structural Tensions in the Transition to the Circular Economy: the Case of Electric Vehicle Batteries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1157-1185, September.
    16. Cris Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano & Yvonne Meer, 2022. "A Theoretical Framework for Circular Processes and Circular Impacts Through a Comprehensive Review of Indicators," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 291-314, June.
    17. Widjonarko & Rudy Soenoko & Slamet Wahyudi & Eko Siswanto, 2019. "Comparison of Intelligence Control Systems for Voltage Controlling on Small Scale Compressed Air Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Marco Raugei & Bernhard Steubing & Anthony Hartwell & Paul A. Anderson & Oliver Heidrich, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling using pyrometallurgical technologies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1560-1571, December.
    19. Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2019. "A Structured Literature Review on Obsolete Electric Vehicles Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Rahil Parag Sheth & Narendra Singh Ranawat & Ayon Chakraborty & Rajesh Prasad Mishra & Manoj Khandelwal, 2023. "The Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Process from a Circular Economy Perspective—A Review and Future Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10745-:d:644572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.