IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8541-d605317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increase in the Value Added of Land Due to the Establishment of Industrial Parks

Author

Listed:
  • Vaida Vabuolytė

    (Department of Roads, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Marija Burinskienė

    (Department of Roads, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Sílvia Sousa

    (CITTA Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Olga Petrakovska

    (Department of Land Management and Cadastre, Faculty of GIS and Territories Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 03037 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Mykola Trehub

    (Department of Geodesy, Faculty of Construction, Dnipro University of Technology, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine)

  • Michela Tiboni

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics DICATAM, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

Abstract

Industrial parks (IPs) are a frequently used regional policy tool to increase economic viability and social equality. Successful functioning of such areas can increase land use efficiency and, by attracting investment, create high added value nationwide. However, the creation of IPs requires significant initial investments in the installation of their infrastructure and the preparation of plots of land, which is often realized through public financial instruments. The overall objective of the research is to present the different strategies for IP development in three different countries’ economies, to discuss the outputs and added value created by such areas, and to provide insights and suggestions for the planning and development of efficient industrial land as well as to increase its value in the developing and middle-income countries. To achieve these aims, the authors of the research present and analyze IP development practices and policy tools in the developed countries of Lithuania and Portugal, and provide suggestions for the developing country of Ukraine. In this study, the authors use statistical and spatial GIS and economic data, and analyze and compare them. The results show that IPs are being developed all over Europe and the world, but each country is creating its own legal framework and appropriate incentives for companies operating in these areas, so the performance of such areas varies a great deal.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaida Vabuolytė & Marija Burinskienė & Sílvia Sousa & Olga Petrakovska & Mykola Trehub & Michela Tiboni, 2021. "Increase in the Value Added of Land Due to the Establishment of Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8541-:d:605317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erwin Van Der Krabben & Jacques Van Dinteren, 2010. "Public Development Of Industrial Estates In The Netherlands: Undesired Market Outcomes And Policy Interventions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(1), pages 91-99, February.
    2. Chaisse, Julien & Ji, Xueliang, 2020. "The Pervasive Problem of Special Economic Zones for International Economic Law: Tax, Investment, and Trade Issues," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 567-588, October.
    3. E.R. Alexander, 2012. "Institutional Design for Value Capture and a Case: The Tel-Aviv Metropolitan Park," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 163-177.
    4. Umberto Mecca & Paolo Piantanida & Francesco Prizzon & Manuela Rebaudengo, 2019. "Impact of Brownfield Sites on Local Energy Production as Resilient Response to Land Contamination: A Case Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Erik Louw & Yvonne Bontekoning, 2007. "Planning Of Industrial Land In The Netherlands: Its Rationales And Consequences," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(1), pages 121-129, February.
    6. Rui António Rodigues Ramos & Fernando Pereira Fonseca, 2016. "A methodology to identify a network of industrial parks in the Ave valley, Portugal," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1844-1862, October.
    7. Michael T. Peddle, 1993. "Planned Industrial and Commercial Developments in the United States: A Review of the History, Literature, and Empirical Evidence Regarding Industrial Parks and Research Parks," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 7(1), pages 107-124, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chui-Yu Chiu & William Tang, 2022. "Measuring the Operational Efficiency and the Water Resources Management Efficiency for Industrial Parks: Empirical Study of Industrial Parks in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yafen He & Zhenhong Zhu & Hualin Xie & Xinmin Zhang & Meiqi Sheng, 2023. "A case study in China of the influence mechanism of industrial park efficiency using DEA," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7261-7280, July.
    2. Chryssy Potsiou & Charalabos Ioannidis & Sofia Soile & Styliani Verykokou & Maria Gkeli & Maria Filippakopoulou, 2022. "A Technical Tool for Urban Upgrading: An Application for Cultural Heritage Preservation and Planning for Affordable Housing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yan, Kun & Gao, Hanbo & Liu, Rui & Lyu, Yizheng & Wan, Mei & Tian, Jinping & Chen, Lyujun, 2024. "Review on low-carbon development in Chinese industrial parks driven by bioeconomy strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Xiaoyu He & Bo Li, 2023. "A Study on the Influence of Green Industrial Policy on Urban Green Development: Based on the Empirical Data of Ecological Industrial Park Pilot Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2018. "Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, January.
    6. Ema Alihodžić Jašarović & Svetlana Perović & Sanja Paunović Žarić, 2021. "Impacts of Arsenal Brownfield Regeneration on Urban Development of Tivat in Montenegro: From Industrial Settlement to Center of Nautical Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-34, July.
    7. Slaev, Aleksandar D. & Alexander, Ernest R. & Zdravkov, Zdravko & Ivanov, Valeri & Georgieva, Snezhina, 2022. "Market tools for the provision of urban green spaces in post-socialist Sofia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Qingshan Ma & Yuanmeng Zhang & Kexin Yang & Lingyun He, 2021. "Have China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones Improved Green Total Factor Productivity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Friso Vor & Henri Groot, 2010. "Agglomeration externalities and localized employment growth: the performance of industrial sites in Amsterdam," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(3), pages 409-431, June.
    10. Jing, Yifan & Zhu, Li & Yin, Baoquan & Li, Fangfang, 2023. "Evaluating the PV system expansion potential of existing integrated energy parks: A case study in North China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    11. Or Levkovich & Jan Rouwendal, 2016. "Spatial Planning and Segmentation of the Land Market," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-018/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Sungmin Yun & Wooyong Jung, 2017. "Benchmarking Sustainability Practices Use throughout Industrial Construction Project Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Fei Xie & Shuaibing Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Fengmei Quan, 2022. "Evolution Mode, Influencing Factors, and Socioeconomic Value of Urban Industrial Land Management in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-33, September.
    14. Yuan, Quan & Zhu, Jiren, 2019. "Logistics sprawl in Chinese metropolises: Evidence from Wuhan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 242-252.
    15. Friso de Vor & Henri L.F. de Groot, 0000. "The Impact of Industrial Sites on Residential Property Values," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-035/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Urban and Suburban Green," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. O.A. Sinenko, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Factors of Functioning of Special Administrative Areas in the Asian-Pacific Region," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(3), pages 524-559.
    18. Tian, Yingying & Zhou, Dingyang & Jiang, Guanghui, 2021. "A new quality management system of admittance indicators to improve industrial land use efficiency in the Beijing−Tianjin−Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Birgit Jakob, 2003. "Skilled labor spillovers from University to High Tech Corporations: The Case of the Research Triangle Park and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill," NEURUS papers neurusp4, NEURUS - Network of European and US Regional and Urban Studies.
    20. Yuan, Quan, 2018. "Mega freight generators in my backyard: A longitudinal study of environmental justice in warehousing location," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 130-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8541-:d:605317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.