IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7772-d592783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Community Conservancy Model Work for Pastoralists? Insights from Naibunga Conservancy in Northern Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Ogao Oburah

    (Department of Natural Resources, Egerton University, 536-20115 Egerton, Kenya)

  • Clement Lenachuru

    (Department of Natural Resources, Egerton University, 536-20115 Egerton, Kenya)

  • Wilfred O. Odadi

    (Department of Natural Resources, Egerton University, 536-20115 Egerton, Kenya
    Mpala Research Centre, 555-10400 Nanyuki, Kenya)

Abstract

Community conservancies are increasingly being established across African pastoral rangelands to help bolster wildlife conservation and livelihoods. Enhancing the effectiveness and sustainability of such conservancies requires better understanding of local community participation and perceptions of their socioeconomic outcomes. Working in Naibunga Community Conservancy in northern Kenya, we evaluated: (1) local community members’ perceptions of conservancy-related socioeconomic outcomes; (2) their involvement in conservancy management and conservation activities; and (3) association between these factors (perceptions and involvement) and various demographic factors. We conducted surveys in 358 households, selected using multi-stage sampling, and additionally interviewed key informants. Large proportions (65–90%) respondents perceived conservancy-related improvements in their overall socioeconomic status, security, household income, livestock numbers, and accessibility to grazing resources, schools, and health facilities. Over 75% of respondents indicated that they were involved in conservancy management and conservation activities. Involvement in these activities was positively associated with perception of socioeconomic improvements. In addition, various demographic factors shaped both perceptions of socioeconomic changes and involvement in conservancy activities. Our findings suggest that community conservancies can improve local pastoralists’ socioeconomic wellbeing. Such conservancies can achieve far greater outcomes with greater focus on maximizing socioeconomic benefits for local pastoralists and enhancing their participation in conservancy activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Ogao Oburah & Clement Lenachuru & Wilfred O. Odadi, 2021. "Does the Community Conservancy Model Work for Pastoralists? Insights from Naibunga Conservancy in Northern Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7772-:d:592783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen M. Mureithi & Ann Verdoodt & Jesse T. Njoka & Joseph Ole Sarioyo & Eric Van Ranst, 2019. "Community-Based Conservation: An Emerging Land Use at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface in Northern Kenya," Chapters, in: Jafari Ramadhani Kideghesho & Alfan Rija (ed.), Wildlife Management - Failures, Successes and Prospects, IntechOpen.
    2. Oecd, 2013. "What Are the Social Benefits of Education?," Education Indicators in Focus 10, OECD Publishing.
    3. Ray, Biswajit & Mukherjee, Promita & Bhattacharya, Rabindra N., 2017. "Attitudes and cooperation: does gender matter in community-based forest management?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(5), pages 594-623, October.
    4. Veronica Mwangi & Samuel Owuor & Boniface Kiteme & Markus Giger, 2020. "Beef Production in the Rangelands: A Comparative Assessment between Pastoralism and Large-Scale Ranching in Laikipia County, Kenya," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Aidan Keane & Heather Gurd & Dickson Kaelo & Mohammed Y Said & Jan de Leeuw & J Marcus Rowcliffe & Katherine Homewood, 2016. "Gender Differentiated Preferences for a Community-Based Conservation Initiative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Brianne Riehl & Hisham Zerriffi & Robin Naidoo, 2015. "Effects of Community-Based Natural Resource Management on Household Welfare in Namibia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Oulton, 2013. "Medium and long run prospects for UK growth in the aftermath of the financial crisis," Discussion Papers 1307, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    2. E. Sardianou & I. Kostakis & R. Mitoula & V. Gkaragkani & E. Lalioti & E. Theodoropoulou, 2016. "Understanding the entrepreneurs’ behavioural intentions towards sustainable tourism: a case study from Greece," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 857-879, June.
    3. Nunan, Fiona & Menton, Mary & McDermott, Constance L. & Huxham, Mark & Schreckenberg, Kate, 2021. "How does governance mediate links between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation? Results from a systematic mapping and thematic synthesis of literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Ukaj MIC & Mustafa Topxhiu RAHMIJE, 2019. "The returns to investment in education: Some theoretical and empirical insights," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 193-203.
    5. Mook, Anne & Dwivedi, Puneet, 2022. "Exploring links between education, forest management intentions, and economic outcomes in light of gender differences in the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Dadon-Golan, Zehorit & BenDavid-Hadar, Iris & Klein, Joseph, 2019. "Revisiting educational (in)equity: Measuring educational Gini coefficients for Israeli high schools during the years 2001–2011," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Batara Surya & Syafri Syafri & Hernita Sahban & Harry Hardian Sakti, 2020. "Natural Resource Conservation Based on Community Economic Empowerment: Perspectives on Watershed Management and Slum Settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-31, March.
    8. Turpie, Jane & Letley, Gwyneth, 2021. "Would community conservation initiatives benefit from external financial oversight? A framed field experiment in Namibia’s communal conservancies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Sukumar Sarkar & Biswajit Ray, 2020. "Collective Action and Tragedy of Tank Water," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(2), pages 224-249, December.
    10. Meyer, Maximilian & Klingelhoeffer, Ekkehard & Naidoo, Robin & Wingate, Vladimir & Börner, Jan, 2021. "Tourism opportunities drive woodland and wildlife conservation outcomes of community-based conservation in Namibia's Zambezi region," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Antonia Sohns & Gordon M. Hickey & Jasper R. de Vries & Owen Temby, 2021. "Methodological Challenges in Studying Trust in Natural Resources Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Irina-Elena Gentimir, 2015. "Social Development – Requirement and Consequence of the Evolution of Society," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(2), pages 144-150, April.
    13. Ota, Liz & Lidestav, Gun & Andersson, Elias & Page, Tony & Curnow, Jayne & Nunes, Lilian & Goltiano, Henry & Gregorio, Nestor & dos Santos, Natalia Ferreira & Herbohn, John, 2024. "Reviewing gender roles, relations, and perspectives in small-scale and community forestry – implications for policy and practice," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Jan Börner & Kathy Baylis & Esteve Corbera & Driss Ezzine-de-Blas & Paul J Ferraro & Jordi Honey-Rosés & Renaud Lapeyre & U Martin Persson & Sven Wunder, 2016. "Emerging Evidence on the Effectiveness of Tropical Forest Conservation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2014. "Familienpolitik in ausgewählten europäischen Ländern im Vergleich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 50840.
    16. Gebregziabher, Dawit & Soltani, Arezoo, 2019. "Exclosures in people’s minds: perceptions and attitudes in the Tigray region, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Biswajit Ray & Promita Mukherjee, 2023. "Forest Income and Rural Livelihoods in West Bengal, India," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 11(1), pages 10-35, April.
    18. Agúndez, Dolores & Lawali, Sitou & Mahamane, Ali & Alía, Ricardo & Soliño, Mario, 2022. "Development of agroforestry food resources in Niger: Are farmers’ preferences context specific?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Olga GAGAUZ & Cristina AVRAM & Irina PAHOMII, 2017. "Self-Perceived Health Of The Elderly: Economic And Sociodemographic Inequalities," ECONOMY AND SOCIOLOGY: Theoretical and Scientifical Journal, Socionet;Complexul Editorial "INCE", issue 1-2, pages 45-53.
    20. Addison, Jane & Stoeckl, Natalie & Larson, Silva & Jarvis, Diane & Bidan Aboriginal Corporation, & Bunuba Dawangarri Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC, & Ewamian Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC, & Gooniyandi , 2019. "The ability of community based natural resource management to contribute to development as freedom and the role of access," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 91-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7772-:d:592783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.