IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7649-d590814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Management of Sustainable Tourism in Antarctica: A Rhetoric or Working Progress?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Cajiao

    (Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
    Instituto de Ecología Aplicada ECOLAP-USFQ, Universidad de San Francisco de Quito, Diego de Robles y Pampite, Cumbayá P.O. Box 1712841, Ecuador)

  • Javier Benayas

    (Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, E-28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pablo Tejedo

    (Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, E-28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Yu-Fai Leung

    (Department of Parks Recreation & Tourism Management and Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, 5107 Jordan Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

Abstract

Growth and diversification of tourism activities in Antarctica have not been matched by proactive strategies for planning or management. Recognizing that the adaptive management approach has been effectively implemented in managing tourism in protected areas, we examine to what extent this approach has been incorporated into the Antarctic tourism research and management, and what constraints exist for its implementation. To better understand the extent of literature contributions, we conducted an appraisal of 72 peer-reviewed journal articles published from 1992 to 2020 and Antarctic management documents. From a scientific perspective, researchers have been advocating for adaptive management approaches to Antarctic tourism and have applied different elements, particularly ecological assessments, design of management measures, monitoring, and regulatory mechanisms. However, these contributions have not been necessarily translated into management policy and regulations. We acknowledge that full implementation of an adaptive management approach is not easily achievable due to the unique Antarctic regime. However, we argue that comprehensive site-specific and regional adaptive management models could be applied as the first step for a more systematic implementation. This incremental approach could contribute to enhanced stakeholder participation and improved decision-making processes, ultimately leading to a more proactive and effective management of Antarctic tourism, essential for the conservation of the continent.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Cajiao & Javier Benayas & Pablo Tejedo & Yu-Fai Leung, 2021. "Adaptive Management of Sustainable Tourism in Antarctica: A Rhetoric or Working Progress?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7649-:d:590814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo M. Roura & Alan D. Hemmings, 2011. "Realising Strategic Environmental Assessment In Antarctica," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 483-514.
    2. Verbitsky, Jane, 2018. "Ecosystem services and Antarctica: The time has come?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 381-394.
    3. Zygmunt Kruczek & Zygmunt Kruczek & Michał Kruczek & Adam R. Szromek, 2018. "Possibilities of Using the Tourism Area Life Cycle Model to Understand and Provide Sustainable Solution for Tourism Development in the Antarctic Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Liggett, Daniela & McIntosh, Alison & Thompson, Anna & Gilbert, Neil & Storey, Bryan, 2011. "From frozen continent to tourism hotspot? Five decades of Antarctic tourism development and management, and a glimpse into the future," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 357-366.
    5. Pertierra, L.R. & Santos-Martin, F. & Hughes, K.A. & Avila, C. & Caceres, J.O. & De Filippo, D. & Gonzalez, S. & Grant, S.M. & Lynch, H. & Marina-Montes, C. & Quesada, A. & Tejedo, P. & Tin, T. & Bena, 2021. "Ecosystem services in Antarctica: Global assessment of the current state, future challenges and managing opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zakaria Elkhwesky, 2022. "A systematic and major review of proactive environmental strategies in hospitality and tourism: Looking back for moving forward," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3274-3301, November.
    2. Guomin Li & Wei Li & Yinke Dou & Yigang Wei, 2022. "Antarctic Shipborne Tourism: Carbon Emission and Mitigation Path," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Geng, Yuqing & Zhang, Xiaorui & Gao, Juan & Yan, Yan & Chen, Lingyan, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis of sustainable tourism using CiteSpace," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pertierra, L.R. & Santos-Martin, F. & Hughes, K.A. & Avila, C. & Caceres, J.O. & De Filippo, D. & Gonzalez, S. & Grant, S.M. & Lynch, H. & Marina-Montes, C. & Quesada, A. & Tejedo, P. & Tin, T. & Bena, 2021. "Ecosystem services in Antarctica: Global assessment of the current state, future challenges and managing opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Adam R. Szromek & Mateusz Naramski, 2019. "A Business Model in Spa Tourism Enterprises: Case Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Xiaoping Gu & Carter A. Hunt & Michael L. Lengieza & Lijun Niu & Huiwen Wu & Yue Wang & Xiang Jia, 2020. "Evaluating Residents’ Perceptions of Nature-Based Tourism with a Factor-Cluster Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Adam R. Szromek & Zygmunt Kruczek & Bartłomiej Walas, 2019. "The Attitude of Tourist Destination Residents towards the Effects of Overtourism—Kraków Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Luciano Torres Tricárico & Paulo dos Santos Pires & Marinês da Conceição Walkowski, 2019. "Spaces for Collaborative Arrangements as Social Sustainability in Rural Accommodation in Brazil: Pouso dos Paula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2019. "Consolidation as a risk management method in the lifecycle of a mining company: A novel methodological approach and evidence from the coal industry in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 169-177.
    7. Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "An Analytical Model of Tourist Destination Development and Characteristics of the Development Stages: Example of the Island of Bornholm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Guomin Li & Wei Li & Yinke Dou & Yigang Wei, 2022. "Antarctic Shipborne Tourism: Carbon Emission and Mitigation Path," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Salvador Garcia-Ayllon, 2018. "Urban Transformations as an Indicator of Unsustainability in the P2P Mass Tourism Phenomenon: The Airbnb Case in Spain through Three Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Jun Zhang & Li Cheng, 2019. "Threshold Effect of Tourism Development on Economic Growth Following a Disaster Shock: Evidence from the Wenchuan Earthquake, P.R. China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Jinfang Pu & Jinming Yan, 2024. "Economic Valuation of Nature’s Contributions in the Antarctic: Extension of the Nature’s Contributions to People Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7649-:d:590814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.