IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7294-d584919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Villages’ Development Types Using a Comprehensive Natural–Socioeconomic Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yaqiu Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Jian Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Can Guo

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Tingting Zhang

    (Shandong Tiancheng Land Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Ailing Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Xinyang Yu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

Abstract

The establishment of a comprehensive framework to identify village development types is crucial to formulate plans for rural development and promote rural revitalization. This study proposed a natural–socioeconomic framework to identify the types of villages based on field survey, statistical data, and multi-source remote sensing images. The framework was constructed by combining the two-dimensional natural suitability/restriction evaluation and the four-dimensional socioeconomic development level evaluation. Then, the modified multiplication-weighted summation method and the coupling coordination degree algorithm were employed to identify the villages’ development types. A total of 774 villages of the Laiyang County, eastern China were used as the study areas to examine the framework. The results demonstrated the following. (1) There were 243,318 and 151 villages with high, moderate, low natural suitability, and 62 villages with natural restrictions; and 158,366 and 250 villages with high, moderate, and low economic development level, respectively. The distribution characteristic of natural evaluation was “high in the southwest and low in the northeast”, and the socioeconomic development level was generally centered on the urban area, which presented a “high–medium–low” circle-layer distribution structure. (2) There were 247 villages with high-level coupling coordination, 464 villages with intermediate coupling coordination, 1 village with low-level coupling coordination, and 62 villages with disordered coupling. (3) Based on the coupling coordination evaluation results, villages in the study area were grouped into five types: urbanization development (31%), construction development (16%), agglomeration linkage development (27%), decrease and improvement development (18%), and relocation and integration development (8%). The framework of villages’ development types identification established in this study can enrich the theory of rural geography, and the applied research results can provide a basis for rural revitalization and development planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaqiu Liu & Jian Liu & Can Guo & Tingting Zhang & Ailing Wang & Xinyang Yu, 2021. "Identification of Villages’ Development Types Using a Comprehensive Natural–Socioeconomic Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7294-:d:584919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7294/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7294/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hashemi, Niloofar & Ghaffary, Gholamreza, 2017. "A Proposed Sustainable Rural Development Index (SRDI): Lessons from Hajij village, Iran," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 130-138.
    2. Ronja Herzberg & Tung Gia Pham & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss & Chau Thi Minh Tran, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Xie, Zhen & Zhang, Fengrong & Lun, Fei & Gao, Yang & Ao, Jia & Zhou, Jian, 2020. "Research on a diagnostic system of rural vitalization based on development elements in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Bielska, Anna & Stańczuk-Gałwiaczek, Małgorzata & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Mroczkowski, Robert, 2021. "Implementation of the smart village concept based on selected spatial patterns – A case study of Mazowieckie Voivodeship in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Daizhong Tang & Baorui Li & Yuan Qiu & Linlin Zhao, 2020. "Research on Urban and Rural Coordination Development and Its Driving Force Based on the Space-time Evolvement Taking Guangdong Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Xinguo Bu & Lijie Pu & Chunzhu Shen & Xuefeng Xie & Caiyao Xu, 2020. "Study on the Spatial Restructuring of the Village System at the County Level Oriented toward the Rural Revitalization Strategy: A Case of Jintan District, Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Ristić, Dušan & Vukoičić, Danijela & Milinčić, Miroljub, 2019. "Tourism and sustainable development of rural settlements in protected areas - Example NP Кopaonik (Serbia)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Leo Fatra Nugraha & Lies Sulistyowati & Iwan Setiawan & Trisna Insan Noor, 2022. "Alternative Community-Based Village Development Strategies in Indonesia: Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuexu Zhao & Ruyue Li, 2022. "Coupling and Coordination Analysis of Digital Rural Construction from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization: A Case Study from Zhejiang Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Jianing Wei & Jixiao Cui & Yinan Xu & Jinna Li & Xinyu Lei & Wangsheng Gao & Yuanquan Chen, 2022. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of Major Staple Grain Crops in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Xue Jiang & Xiaoya Song & Hongyu Zhao & Haoran Zhang, 2021. "Rural Tourism Network Evaluation Based on Resource Control Ability Analysis: A Case Study of Ning’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Xiao Lyu & Yanan Wang & Yuntai Zhao & Shandong Niu, 2022. "Spatio‐temporal pattern and mechanism of coordinated development of “population–land–industry–money” in rural areas of three provinces in Northeast China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1333-1361, September.
    6. Ferretti, Paola & Zolin, Maria Bruna & Ferraro, Giacomo, 2020. "Relationships among sustainability dimensions: evidence from an Alpine area case study using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. You Zhou & Yuxin Yao & Zhen Chu & Zheng Lei & Yun Zheng, 2024. "A New Approach to Rural Classification Based on the Filter-Method System: An Empirical Study in Nanning, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Guang Han & Zehao Wei & Huawei Zheng & Liqun Zhu, 2024. "Evaluation Index System of Rural Ecological Revitalization in China: A National Empirical Study Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Tan, Kun & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Pu, Junwei & Li, Sinan & Li, Yuhao & Miao, Peipei & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Zoning regulation and development model for water and land resources in the Karst Mountainous Region of Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Shuchang Li & Wei Song, 2023. "Research Progress in Land Consolidation and Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Characteristics, Regional Differences, and Evolution Laws," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Qiuli Meng & Chaoju Wang & Tao Xu & Hongwen Pi & Yazhou Wei, 2022. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Ethnic Village Tourist Destinations: A Case Study of Jiaju Tibetan Village in Danba County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Ruyida Mushtaq & Rajesh Kumar Yadav & Abida Fayaz Fayaz & Pervez Ahmed & Harmeet Singh, 2024. "Multi-criteria land suitability assessment for mulberry-based agroforestry using AHP and GIS approach in Anantnag district of the Kashmir valley, India, to achieve sustainable agriculture," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28293-28315, November.
    14. Gantian Zheng & Weiwei Wang & Chang Jiang & Fan Jiang, 2023. "Can Rural Industrial Convergence Improve the Total Factor Productivity of Agricultural Environments: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Shiwei Lu & Yaping Huang & Xiaoqing Wu & Yichen Ding, 2022. "Evaluation, Recognition and Implications of Urban–Rural Integration Development: A Township-Level Analysis of Hanchuan City in Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Komeil Mahjori Karmozdi & Mohammad Reza Kohansal & Mohammad Ghorbani, 2020. "Sustainable economic rural development system pattern in Ghaemshahr: an application of the developed TOP-MARD core model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5793-5817, August.
    18. Yiwei Yang & Yanhui Wang, 2023. "Exploring Rural Resilient Factors Based on Spatial Resilience Theory: A Case Study of Southern Jiangsu," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Jie Yin & Xu Zhao & Wenjia Zhang & Pei Wang, 2020. "Rural Land Use Change Driven by Informal Industrialization: Evidence from Fengzhuang Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Heng Wang & Yuting Tang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination between Digital Village and Green and High-Quality Agricultural Development—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7294-:d:584919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.