IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6929-d578219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilizing User-Generated Content and GIS for Flood Susceptibility Modeling in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Jian City in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongping Zeng

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Non-Traditional Security Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yujia Li

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jinyu Lan

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Abdur Rahim Hamidi

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Floods are threats seriously affecting people’s lives and property globally. Risk analysis such as flood susceptibility assessment is one of the critical approaches to mitigate flood impacts. However, the inadequate field survey and lack of data might hinder the mapping of flood susceptibility. The emergence of user-generated content (UGC) in the era of big data provides new opportunities for flood risk management. This research proposed a flood susceptibility assessment model using UGC as a potential data source and conducted empirical research in Ji’an County in China to make up for the lack of ground survey data in mountainous-hilly areas. This article used python crawlers to obtain the geographic location of the floods in Ji’an City from 2016 to 2019 from social media, and the state-of-the-art MaxEnt algorithm was adopted to obtain the flood occurrence map. The map was verified by the flood data crawled from reliable official media, which achieved an average AUC of 0.857% and an overall accuracy of 93.1%. Several novel indicators were used to evaluate the importance of conditioning factors from different perspectives. Land use, slope, and distance from the river were found to contribute most to the occurrence of floods. Our findings have shown that the proposed historical UG C-based model is practical and has good flood-risk-mapping performance. The importance of the conditioning factors to the occurrence of floods can also be ranked. The reports from stakeholders are a great supplement to the insufficient field survey data and tend to be valuable resources for flood disaster preparation and mitigation in the future. Finally, the limitations and future development directions of UGC as a data source for flood risk assessment are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongping Zeng & Yujia Li & Jinyu Lan & Abdur Rahim Hamidi, 2021. "Utilizing User-Generated Content and GIS for Flood Susceptibility Modeling in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Jian City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6929-:d:578219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahya Norallahi & Hesam Seyed Kaboli, 2021. "Urban flood hazard mapping using machine learning models: GARP, RF, MaxEnt and NB," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 119-137, March.
    2. Desirée Tullos & Elizabeth Byron & Gerald Galloway & Jayantha Obeysekera & Om Prakash & Yung-Hsin Sun, 2016. "Review of challenges of and practices for sustainable management of mountain flood hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(3), pages 1763-1797, September.
    3. J. F. Rosser & D. G. Leibovici & M. J. Jackson, 2017. "Rapid flood inundation mapping using social media, remote sensing and topographic data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 103-120, May.
    4. Kaizhong Li & Shaohong Wu & Erfu Dai & Zhongchun Xu, 2012. "Flood loss analysis and quantitative risk assessment in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 737-760, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huan Xu & Ying Wang & Xiaoran Fu & Dong Wang & Qinghua Luan, 2023. "Urban Flood Modeling and Risk Assessment with Limited Observation Data: The Beijing Future Science City of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shanshan Hu & Xiangjun Cheng & Demin Zhou & Hong Zhang, 2017. "GIS-based flood risk assessment in suburban areas: a case study of the Fangshan District, Beijing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1525-1543, July.
    2. Pujun Liang & Wei Xu & Yunjia Ma & Xiujuan Zhao & Lianjie Qin, 2017. "Increase of Elderly Population in the Rainstorm Hazard Areas of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Zijun Qie & Lili Rong, 2017. "An integrated relative risk assessment model for urban disaster loss in view of disaster system theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 165-190, August.
    4. Xi Hu & Jim W. Hall & Peijun Shi & Wee Ho Lim, 2016. "The spatial exposure of the Chinese infrastructure system to flooding and drought hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1083-1118, January.
    5. Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, 2023. "Social media in disaster management: review of the literature and future trends through bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 953-975, September.
    6. Dilshad Ahmad & Malika Kanwal & Muhammad Afzal, 2023. "Climate change effects on riverbank erosion Bait community flood-prone area of Punjab, Pakistan: an application of livelihood vulnerability index," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9387-9415, September.
    7. Yuri B. Kirsta & Ol’ga V. Lovtskaya, 2021. "Good-quality Long-term Forecast of Spring-summer Flood Runoff for Mountain Rivers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 811-825, February.
    8. Deliang Pang & Xinxin Zhang & Jian Zhang, 2024. "A Study to Assess the Performance of Disaster Management During the 2017 Yongji County Flood in China," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 775-790, September.
    9. Yang Zhou & Ning Li & Wenxiang Wu & Haolong Liu & Li Wang & Guangxu Liu & Jidong Wu, 2014. "Socioeconomic development and the impact of natural disasters: some empirical evidences from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 541-554, November.
    10. Bahram Choubin & Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini & Omid Rahmati & Mansor Mehdizadeh Youshanloei, 2023. "A step toward considering the return period in flood spatial modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 431-460, January.
    11. Umesh Chaudhary & Mohammad Aminur Rahman Shah & Bijay Man Shakya & Anil Aryal, 2024. "Flood Susceptibility and Risk Mapping of Kathmandu Valley Watershed, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Showmitra Kumar Sarkar & Saifullah Bin Ansar & Khondaker Mohammed Mohiuddin Ekram & Mehedi Hasan Khan & Swapan Talukdar & Mohd Waseem Naikoo & Abu Reza Towfiqul Islam & Atiqur Rahman & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "Developing Robust Flood Susceptibility Model with Small Numbers of Parameters in Highly Fertile Regions of Northwest Bangladesh for Sustainable Flood and Agriculture Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Clemens Havas & Bernd Resch, 2021. "Portability of semantic and spatial–temporal machine learning methods to analyse social media for near-real-time disaster monitoring," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 2939-2969, September.
    14. Xi Hu & Jim W. Hall & Peijun Shi & Wee Lim, 2016. "The spatial exposure of the Chinese infrastructure system to flooding and drought hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1083-1118, January.
    15. Chau, Vu Ngoc & Cassells, Sue M. & Holland, John, 2014. "Measuring direct losses to rice production from extreme flood events in Quang Nam province, Vietnam," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165813, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Enes Yildirim & Ibrahim Demir, 2019. "An integrated web framework for HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 275-286, October.
    17. Wenjuan Sun & Paolo Bocchini & Brian D. Davison, 2020. "Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 2631-2689, September.
    18. Xiao-ling Yang & Jie-hua Ding & Hui Hou, 2013. "Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 657-674, September.
    19. Jiexiong Duan & Weixin Zhai & Chengqi Cheng, 2020. "Crowd Detection in Mass Gatherings Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of the 2014 Shanghai New Year’s Eve Stampede," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Md Shahinoor Rahman & Liping Di, 2020. "A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-30, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6929-:d:578219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.