IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6737-d574778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Wood Product Utilization on Climate Change Mitigation in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Eun-Kyung Jang

    (National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea)

  • Yeo-Chang Youn

    (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
    Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

Many countries, including South Korea, decided to suspend the inclusion of harvested wood products in their Nationally Determined Contributions, as part of the carbon inventory, in 2016. The inclusion of harvested wood products in the national greenhouse gases inventory must ensure the accuracy of carbon accounting and its conformity with the policy direction. The method used for harvested wood product carbon accounting can influence the accuracy of carbon account value, as well as policy direction based on greenhouse gas accounting. This research evaluated the utilization of domestic wood resources in South Korea in terms of carbon storage impacts from the perspective of the cascading use of wood products. The study also compared the two accounting methods (Tier 2 and Tier 3) of carbon storage for the period from 1970 to 2080, assuming the current pattern of wood resource utilization for the next sixty years. The results show that the current utilization of domestic wood resources is inefficient in terms of climate change mitigation. The analysis shows that there is a significant difference between the Tier 2 and Tier 3 methods in carbon storage effects, and the amount of harvested wood products carbon stock calculated by the Tier 2 method was found to be approximately double that of Tier 3. This result implies that there is a possibility of overestimating the carbon storage of harvested wood products when using the Tier 2 method in the case of net timber-importing countries, such as South Korea. The study can provide guidance for designing timber resource management from the perspective of the cascading use of wood products in order to contribute to sustainable development goals, including climate change mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun-Kyung Jang & Yeo-Chang Youn, 2021. "Effects of Wood Product Utilization on Climate Change Mitigation in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6737-:d:574778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gayoung Choi & Yoonjeong Jeong & Seong-il Kim, 2019. "Success Factors of National-Scale Forest Restorations in South Korea, Vietnam, and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Charles Breton & Pierre Blanchet & Ben Amor & Robert Beauregard & Wen-Shao Chang, 2018. "Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Gediminas JasineviÄ ius & Marcus Lindner & Emil Cienciala & Markku Tykkyläinen, 2018. "Carbon Accounting in Harvested Wood Products: Assessment Using Material Flow Analysis Resulting in Larger Pools Compared to the IPCC Default Method," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(1), pages 121-131, February.
    4. K. Pingoud & A. Lehtilä, 2002. "Fossil carbon emissions associated with carbon flowsof wood products," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 63-83, March.
    5. Park, Mi Sun & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2017. "Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 45-55.
    6. K. Pingoud & A.-L. Perälä & A. Pussinen, 2001. "Carbon dynamics in wood products," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 91-111, June.
    7. Youn, Yeo-Chang & Choi, Junyeong & de Jong, Wil & Liu, Jinlong & Park, Mi Sun & Camacho, Leni D. & Tachibana, Satoshi & Huudung, Nguyen Din & Bhojvaid, Padam Parkash & Damayanti, Ellyn K. & Wanneng, P, 2017. "Conditions of forest transition in Asian countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 14-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erwin M. Schau & Igor Gavrić & Iztok Šušteršič & Eva Prelovšek Niemelä & Balázs Dávid & Jaka Gašper Pečnik & David B. DeVallance & Črtomir Tavzes, 2023. "Modelling the Slovenian Wood Industry’s Response to the Greenhouse Gas Paris Agreement and the EU “Fit for 55” Green Transition Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jong, Wil & Liu, Jinlong & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2017. "Land and forests in the Anthropocene: Trends and outlooks in Asia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 17-25.
    2. Brainard, Julii & Lovett, Andrew & Bateman, Ian, 2006. "Sensitivity analysis in calculating the social value of carbon sequestered in British grown Sitka spruce," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 201-228, December.
    3. Braun, Martin & Winner, Georg & Schwarzbauer, Peter & Stern, Tobias, 2016. "Apparent Half-Life-Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) in Austria: Development and analysis of weighted time-series for 2002 to 2011," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 28-34.
    4. Andoh, Jewel & Lee, Yohan, 2018. "Forest transition through reforestation policy integration: A comparative study between Ghana and the Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 12-21.
    5. Reid Miner, 2023. "The 100-Year Method for Forecasting Carbon Sequestration in Forest Products in Use," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Nadine May & Edeltraud Guenther & Peer Haller, 2017. "Environmental Indicators for the Evaluation of Wood Products in Consideration of Site-Dependent Aspects: A Review and Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Park, Mi Sun & Lee, Hyowon, 2019. "Accountability and reciprocal interests of bilateral forest cooperation under the global forest regime," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 32-44.
    8. Numazawa, Camila T.D. & Numazawa, Sueo & Pacca, Sergio & John, Vanderley M., 2017. "Logging residues and CO2 of Brazilian Amazon timber: Two case studies of forest harvesting," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 280-285.
    9. Emily Hope & Bruno Gagnon & Vanja Avdić, 2020. "Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change Policies on the Market for Forest Industrial Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Federico E. Alice‐Guier & Frits Mohren & Pieter A. Zuidema, 2020. "The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 534-547, June.
    11. Soe, Khaing Thandar & Yeo-Chang, YOUN, 2019. "Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: A case study in Bago Yoma, South-Central Myanmar," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 129-141.
    12. Kevin Allan & Adam R. Phillips, 2021. "Comparative Cradle-to-Grave Life Cycle Assessment of Low and Mid-Rise Mass Timber Buildings with Equivalent Structural Steel Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Elias Hurmekoski & Tanja Myllyviita & Jyri Seppälä & Tero Heinonen & Antti Kilpeläinen & Timo Pukkala & Tuomas Mattila & Lauri Hetemäki & Antti Asikainen & Heli Peltola, 2020. "Impact of structural changes in wood‐using industries on net carbon emissions in Finland," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 899-912, August.
    14. Park, Mi Sun & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2017. "Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 45-55.
    15. Luyang Zhang & Yankun Sun & Tianyuan Song & Jiaqi Xu, 2019. "Harvested Wood Products as a Carbon Sink in China, 1900–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Jim Hart & Francesco Pomponi, 2020. "More Timber in Construction: Unanswered Questions and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Hubert Paluš & Ján Parobek & Martin Moravčík & Miroslav Kovalčík & Michal Dzian & Vlastimil Murgaš, 2020. "Projecting Climate Change Potential of Harvested Wood Products under Different Scenarios of Wood Production and Utilization: Study of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Roger Sedjo, 2002. "Wood materials used as a means to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs): An examination of wooden utility poles," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 191-200, June.
    19. Jang-Hwan Jo & Taewoo Roh & Seunguk Shin & Yeo-Chang Youn, 2019. "Sustainable Assets and Strategies Affecting the Forestry Household Income: Empirical Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Brainard, Julii & Bateman, Ian J. & Lovett, Andrew A., 2009. "The social value of carbon sequestered in Great Britain's woodlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1257-1267, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6737-:d:574778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.