IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6370-d568417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cluster Analysis Approach to Profile Men and Women’s Volley Positions in Professional Tennis Matches (Doubles)

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Martínez-Gallego

    (Department of Sport and Physical Education, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Jesús Ramón-Llin

    (Department of Teaching of Music, Visual and Corporal Expression, University of Valencia, 46021 Valencia, Spain)

  • Miguel Crespo

    (Integrity and Development Department, International Tennis Federation, London SW15 5XZ, UK)

Abstract

(1) Background: Tennis ball tracking technology allows the aquirement of novel and reliable data about several performance indicators, such as volley positions. This information is key to understand match dynamics in doubles tennis and to better help preparing players for the demands they will face in match play. As such, the purpose of this study was to describe and compare the different types of volley positions in men’s and women’s doubles professional tennis. (2) Methods: Ball tracking data were collected for 46 women (Billie Jean King Cup) and 96 men’s doubles matches (Davis Cup). The variables used were the distance to the net, the distance to the centre of the court and the height of the impact. A K-Means cluster analysis was used to identify in each subsample different profiles of volley locations. (3) Results: The inferential analysis revealed differences in men’s (distance to the net η 2 = 0.72, distance to the centre of the court η 2 = 0.77 and impact height η 2 = 0.63) and women’s subsamples (distance to the net η 2 = 0.48, distance to the centre of the court η 2 = 0.52 and impact height η 2 = 0.51). (4) Conclusions: The results allowed the suggestion of a higher variability in men’s matches, as there were seven different clusters identified, and only four in women’s.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Martínez-Gallego & Jesús Ramón-Llin & Miguel Crespo, 2021. "A Cluster Analysis Approach to Profile Men and Women’s Volley Positions in Professional Tennis Matches (Doubles)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-9, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6370-:d:568417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaime Sampaio & Tim McGarry & Julio Calleja-González & Sergio Jiménez Sáiz & Xavi Schelling i del Alcázar & Mindaugas Balciunas, 2015. "Exploring Game Performance in the National Basketball Association Using Player Tracking Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Robert Tibshirani & Guenther Walther & Trevor Hastie, 2001. "Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 411-423.
    3. Rafael Martínez-Gallego & Fernando Vives & José Francisco Guzmán & Jesús Ramón-Llin & Miguel Crespo, 2021. "Time structure in men’s professional doubles tennis: does team experience allow finishing the points faster?," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 215-225, March.
    4. Kristijan Breznik, 2015. "Revealing the best doubles teams and players in tennis history," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 1213-1226, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiemo Fetzer & Samuel Marden, 2017. "Take What You Can: Property Rights, Contestability and Conflict," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 757-783, May.
    2. Daniel Agness & Travis Baseler & Sylvain Chassang & Pascaline Dupas & Erik Snowberg, 2022. "Valuing the Time of the Self-Employed," CESifo Working Paper Series 9567, CESifo.
    3. Batool, Fatima & Hennig, Christian, 2021. "Clustering with the Average Silhouette Width," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Nicoleta Serban & Huijing Jiang, 2012. "Multilevel Functional Clustering Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 805-814, September.
    5. Orietta Nicolis & Jean Paul Maidana & Fabian Contreras & Danilo Leal, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Economic Sustainability: A Clustering Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
    6. Juan M. García-Ceberino & Antonio Antúnez & Sebastián Feu & Sergio J. Ibáñez, 2020. "Quantification of Internal and External Load in School Football According to Gender and Teaching Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Li, Pai-Ling & Chiou, Jeng-Min, 2011. "Identifying cluster number for subspace projected functional data clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 2090-2103, June.
    8. Yaeji Lim & Hee-Seok Oh & Ying Kuen Cheung, 2019. "Multiscale Clustering for Functional Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 368-391, July.
    9. Forzani, Liliana & Gieco, Antonella & Tolmasky, Carlos, 2017. "Likelihood ratio test for partial sphericity in high and ultra-high dimensions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 18-38.
    10. Yujia Li & Xiangrui Zeng & Chien‐Wei Lin & George C. Tseng, 2022. "Simultaneous estimation of cluster number and feature sparsity in high‐dimensional cluster analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 574-585, June.
    11. Vojtech Blazek & Michal Petruzela & Tomas Vantuch & Zdenek Slanina & Stanislav Mišák & Wojciech Walendziuk, 2020. "The Estimation of the Influence of Household Appliances on the Power Quality in a Microgrid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Andrew Clark & Alexander Mihailov & Michael Zargham, 2024. "Complex Systems Modeling of Community Inclusion Currencies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 1259-1294, August.
    13. Nicoleta Serban, 2008. "Estimating and clustering curves in the presence of heteroscedastic errors," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 553-571.
    14. Caruso, Germán & Scartascini, Carlos & Tommasi, Mariano, 2015. "Are we all playing the same game? The economic effects of constitutions depend on the degree of institutionalization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 212-228.
    15. Alessandro Crimi & Olivier Commowick & Adil Maarouf & Jean-Christophe Ferré & Elise Bannier & Ayman Tourbah & Isabelle Berry & Jean-Philippe Ranjeva & Gilles Edan & Christian Barillot, 2014. "Predictive Value of Imaging Markers at Multiple Sclerosis Disease Onset Based on Gadolinium- and USPIO-Enhanced MRI and Machine Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Mehmet Çağlar & Cem Gürler, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals: A cluster analysis of worldwide countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8593-8624, June.
    17. Elizabeth Tipton & Robert B. Olsen, "undated". "Enhancing the Generalizability of Impact Studies in Education," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 35d5625333dc480aba9765b3b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    18. Cyril Atkinson-Clement & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "What can we learn from Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on human behaviour? The case of France’s lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Jelle R Dalenberg & Luca Nanetti & Remco J Renken & René A de Wijk & Gert J ter Horst, 2014. "Dealing with Consumer Differences in Liking during Repeated Exposure to Food; Typical Dynamics in Rating Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Daniel Lewis & Davide Melcangi & Laura Pilossoph, 2019. "Latent Heterogeneity in the Marginal Propensity to Consume," 2019 Meeting Papers 519, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6370-:d:568417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.