IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5899-d560995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evaluation of Experimental Variables for Sustainable Virtual Road Safety Audits

Author

Listed:
  • Yeonsoo Jun

    (International School of Urban Sciences, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea)

  • Juneyoung Park

    (Department of Transportation & Logistics Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan-si 15588, Korea
    Department of Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan-si 15588, Korea)

  • Chunho Yeom

    (International School of Urban Sciences, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea)

Abstract

This paper evaluates experimental variables for virtual road safety audits (VRSAs) through practical experiments to promote sustainable road safety. VRSAs perform road safety audits using driving simulators (DSs), and all objects in the road environment cannot be experimental variables because of realistic constraints. Therefore, the study evaluates the likelihood of recommendation of VRSA experimental variables by comparing DSs experiments and field reviews to secure sustainable road safety conditions. The net promoter score results evaluated “Tunnel”, “Bridge”, “Underpass”, “Footbridge”, “Traffic island”, “Sign”, “Lane”, “Road marking”, “Traffic light”, “Median barrier”, “Road furniture”, and “Traffic condition” as recommended variables. On the contrary, the “Road pavement”, “Drainage”, “Lighting”, “Vehicle”, “Pedestrian”, “Bicycle”, “Accident”, and “Hazard event” variables were not recommended. The study can be used for decision making in VRSA scenario development as an initial effort to evaluate its experimental variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeonsoo Jun & Juneyoung Park & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "The Evaluation of Experimental Variables for Sustainable Virtual Road Safety Audits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5899-:d:560995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas I. Fisher & Raymond E. Kordupleski, 2019. "Good and bad market research: A critical review of Net Promoter Score," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 138-151, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Larson, John & Jaworski, Bernard J. & Larson, Jack, 2021. "Managing your most loyal customer relationships," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 141-147.
    2. Carlos Lamela-Orcasitas & Jesús García-Madariaga, 2023. "How to really quantify the economic value of customer information in corporate databases," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Asier Baquero, 2022. "Net Promoter Score (NPS) and Customer Satisfaction: Relationship and Efficient Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Laura Grassi & Nicolas Figini & Lorenzo Fedeli, 2022. "How does a data strategy enable customer value? The case of FinTechs and traditional banks under the open finance framework," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-34, December.
    5. Gheorghe Zaman & Nicoleta Valentina Florea & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Marius Coman & Doina Constanta Mihai & Nicoleta Luminita Gudanescu Nicolau, 2022. "Mathematical Model for Determining Costs of Unsatisfied Customers of HoReCa Industry," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 268-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5899-:d:560995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.