IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5744-d558708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Science and Practice-Importance of Stakeholders in the Development of Decision Support: Lessons Learned

Author

Listed:
  • Innocent K. Tumwebaze

    (Water, Health and Applied Microbiology Lab, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
    Department of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Joan B. Rose

    (Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Nynke Hofstra

    (Water Systems and Global Change Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Matthew E. Verbyla

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Daniel A. Okaali

    (Water Systems and Global Change Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Panagis Katsivelis

    (Venthic Technologies, 121 37 Athens, Greece)

  • Heather M. Murphy

    (Water, Health and Applied Microbiology Lab, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
    Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College (OVC), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

Abstract

User-friendly, evidence-based scientific tools to support sanitation decisions are still limited in the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector. This commentary provides lessons learned from the development of two sanitation decision support tools developed in collaboration with stakeholders in Uganda. We engaged with stakeholders in a variety of ways to effectively obtain their input in the development of the decision support tools. Key lessons learned included: tailoring tools to stakeholder decision-making needs; simplifying the tools as much as possible for ease of application and use; creating an enabling environment that allows active stakeholder participation; having a dedicated and responsive team to plan and execute stakeholder engagement activities; involving stakeholders early in the process; having funding sources that are flexible and long-term; and including resources for the acquisition of local data. This reflection provides benchmarks for future research and the development of tools that utilize scientific data and emphasizes the importance of engaging with stakeholders in the development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Innocent K. Tumwebaze & Joan B. Rose & Nynke Hofstra & Matthew E. Verbyla & Daniel A. Okaali & Panagis Katsivelis & Heather M. Murphy, 2021. "Bridging Science and Practice-Importance of Stakeholders in the Development of Decision Support: Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5744-:d:558708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murphy, Heather M. & McBean, Edward A. & Farahbakhsh, Khosrow, 2009. "Appropriate technology – A comprehensive approach for water and sanitation in the developing world," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 158-167.
    2. Nadia Sitas & Heidi E. Prozesky & Karen J. Esler & Belinda Reyers, 2014. "Exploring the Gap between Ecosystem Service Research and Management in Development Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Hewett, Caspar J.M. & Quinn, Paul F. & Wilkinson, Mark E., 2016. "The decision support matrix (DSM) approach to reducing environmental risk in farmed landscapes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 74-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jocelyne K. Mwabi & Bhekie B. Mamba & Maggy N. B. Momba, 2012. "Removal of Escherichia coli and Faecal Coliforms from Surface Water and Groundwater by Household Water Treatment Devices/Systems: A Sustainable Solution for Improving Water Quality in Rural Communitie," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Brunet, Lucas & Tuomisaari, Johanna & Lavorel, Sandra & Crouzat, Emilie & Bierry, Adeline & Peltola, Taru & Arpin, Isabelle, 2018. "Actionable knowledge for land use planning: Making ecosystem services operational," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-34.
    3. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    4. Débora Cynamon Kligerman & Telma Abdalla de Oliveira Cardoso & Simone Cynamon Cohen & Déborah Chein Bueno de Azevedo & Graziella de Araújo Toledo & Ana Paula Chein Bueno de Azevedo & Susanne M. Charle, 2022. "Methodology for a Comprehensive Health Impact Assessment in Water Supply and Sanitation Programmes for Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Chen, Chundi & Wang, Yuncai & Jia, Junsong & Mao, Longfei & Meurk, Colin D., 2019. "Ecosystem services mapping in practice: A Pasteur’s quadrant perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    6. Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S. & Sachet, Erwan & Blundo-Canto, Genowefa & Vanegas, Martha & Quintero, Marcela, 2017. "To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 201-212.
    7. Patnaik, Jayshree & Bhowmick, Bhaskar, 2019. "Revisiting appropriate technology with changing socio-technical landscape in emerging countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 8-19.
    8. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Sorensen, Ingrid M. & McBean, Edward A., 2015. "Beyond appropriate technology: Social considerations for the sustainable use of Arsenic–Iron Removal Plants in rural Bangladesh," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-9.
    10. I. Zelenika & J. Pearce, 2014. "Innovation through collaboration: scaling up solutions for sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1299-1316, December.
    11. Willcock, Simon & Hooftman, Danny & Sitas, Nadia & O’Farrell, Patrick & Hudson, Malcolm D. & Reyers, Belinda & Eigenbrod, Felix & Bullock, James M., 2016. "Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 110-117.
    12. Margaret Ndapewa Angula & Immaculate Mogotsi & Selma Lendelvo & Karl Mutani Aribeb & Aina-Maria Iteta & Jessica P. R. Thorn, 2021. "Strengthening Gender Responsiveness of the Green Climate Fund Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Programme in Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Leyre Echevarría Icaza & Franklin Van der Hoeven, 2017. "Regionalist Principles to Reduce the Urban Heat Island Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Abhipsa Pal & Rahul De’ & Tejaswini Herath, 2020. "The Role of Mobile Payment Technology in Sustainable and Human-Centric Development: Evidence from the Post-Demonetization Period in India," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 607-631, June.
    15. Linrun Qiu & Yuxiang Dong & Hai Liu, 2022. "Integrating Ecosystem Services into Planning Practice: Situation, Challenges and Inspirations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Nick Hanley & Stephen Hynes & Niels Jobstvogt & David M. Paterson, 2014. "Economic valuation of marine and coastal ecosystems:Is it currently fit for purpose?," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2014-11, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    17. Kalbar, Pradip P. & Karmakar, Subhankar & Asolekar, Shyam R., 2012. "Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 295-302.
    18. Daniel Rozas-Vásquez & Marcin Spyra & Felipe Jorquera & Sebastián Molina & Nica Claudia Caló, 2022. "Ecosystem Services Supply from Peri-Urban Landscapes and Their Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: A Global Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Vrebos, Dirk & Staes, Jan & Vandenbroucke, Tom & D׳Haeyer, Tom & Johnston, Robyn & Muhumuza, Moses & Kasabeke, Clovis & Meire, Patrick, 2015. "Mapping ecosystem service flows with land cover scoring maps for data-scarce regions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 28-40.
    20. Julian Andres Castrillon-Gomez & Gerard Olivar-Tost & Johnny Valencia-Calvo, 2022. "Systems Dynamics and the Analytical Network Process for the Evaluation and Prioritization of Green Projects: Proposal That Involves Participative Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5744-:d:558708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.