IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3712-d353751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol for Post Occupancy Evaluation in Schools to Improve Indoor Environmental Quality and Energy Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Erica Cochran Hameen

    (Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

  • Bobuchi Ken-Opurum

    (School of Architecture/Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

  • Young Joo Son

    (Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

Abstract

Research has shown a strong correlation between the performance and health of young students and teachers, and the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of their schools. A post occupancy evaluation (POE) of a school’s IEQ can help stakeholders understand the current conditions of the building and their impact on occupant wellbeing and productivity. It can also provide pathways for building performance upgrades and resource allocation for school administrations. However, current research on POE in schools frequently omits the contexts of young students during evaluations. Furthermore, there is limited research on guidelines for performing POE and measurements in school facilities. This study adopted the National Environmental Assessment Toolkit (NEAT) and tailored qualitative methods to evaluate eight schools over an eight-year period. The methodology was refined throughout the study to develop a protocol for robust investigation of IEQ conditions in schools. The NEAT was developed by Carnegie Mellon University’s Centre for Building Performance and Diagnostics for measuring the IEQ of office buildings. The paper addresses the challenges that may occur during POE and measurements (POE+M) and the differences between POE+M for offices and schools. It also determines how the POE+M process can be efficiently implemented to include all primary stakeholders in order to improve data collection for IEQ and energy efficiency analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica Cochran Hameen & Bobuchi Ken-Opurum & Young Joo Son, 2020. "Protocol for Post Occupancy Evaluation in Schools to Improve Indoor Environmental Quality and Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3712-:d:353751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mendell, M.J. & Fisk, W.J. & Kreiss, K. & Levin, H. & Alexander, D. & Cain, W.S. & Girman, J.R. & Hines, C.J. & Jensen, P.A. & Milton, D.K. & Rexroat, L.P. & Wallingford, K.M., 2002. "Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: Priority research needs for a National Occupational Research Agenda," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(9), pages 1430-1440.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michele Zinzi & Francesca Pagliaro & Stefano Agnoli & Fabio Bisegna & Domenico Iatauro, 2021. "On the Built-Environment Quality in Nearly Zero-Energy Renovated Schools: Assessment and Impact of Passive Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Pierfrancesco Fiore & Giuseppe Donnarumma & Carmelo Falce & Emanuela D’Andria & Claudia Sicignano, 2020. "An AHP-Based Methodology for Decision Support in Integrated Interventions in School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Lin Yang & Sha Liu & Jiaqi Liu, 2021. "The Interaction Effect of Occupant Behavior-Related Factors in Office Buildings Based on the DNAS Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Arturo Realyvásquez-Vargas & Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macías & Karina Cecilia Arredondo-Soto & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Teresa Carrillo-Gutiérrez & Guadalupe Hernández-Escobedo, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental Factors on Academic Performance of University Students Taking Online Classes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    2. He Zhang & Ravi Srinivasan, 2020. "A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-38, October.
    3. Gyu-Bae Lee & Seung-Min Lee & Seung-Eon Lee & Jae-Weon Jeong & Jong-Won Lee, 2022. "A Comparative Field Study of Indoor Environment Quality and Work Productivity between Job Types in a Research Institute in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Jutta Hollands & Azra Korjenic, 2021. "Indirect Economic Effects of Vertical Indoor Green in the Context of Reduced Sick Leave in Offices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Felipe Quesada-Molina & Sebastián Astudillo-Cordero, 2023. "Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment Model (IEQ) for Houses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Chua, K.J. & Chou, S.K. & Yang, W.M. & Yan, J., 2013. "Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning – A review of technologies and strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 87-104.
    7. Ma, Nan & Aviv, Dorit & Guo, Hongshan & Braham, William W., 2021. "Measuring the right factors: A review of variables and models for thermal comfort and indoor air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3712-:d:353751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.