IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3552-d350884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Variability of Soil Moisture in Relation to Land Use Types and Topographic Features on Hillslopes in the Black Soil (Mollisols) Area of Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxin Guo

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Qiang Fu

    (School of Water Conservancy & Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yanhong Hang

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • He Lu

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Fengjie Gao

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Jingbo Si

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Soil moisture, as a crucial factor in the eco-hydrological process, is of great importance for food production, land management in response to water and soil loss, geomorphic processes, and environmental protection. Understanding the spatial variability of soil moisture induced by different land use types and topographic features is conducive to advancing the adjustment of the land use structure and preventing soil erosion on the hillslopes in the black soil (Mollisols) area of Northeast China. Classical statistical methods and Canonical Correspondence Analysis were used to analyze the spatial heterogeneity of soil moisture at 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm on slopes, to identify the main controlling factors and their relative contributions. The results suggested that: the average soil moisture content followed a decreasing order of grassland > shrubland > soybean land > maize land > adzuki bean ( Vigna angularis ) land > forestland; the profile soil moisture content (SMC) patterns could be divided into four types, related to the comprehensive influence of vegetation types, root system characteristics, and topographic attributes; the spatial variability of soil moisture was strongly influenced by slope gradient, followed by land use types and elevation and slope position, while slope aspect had the least impact; and finally, land use type had a greater impact on the deep layer than the surface layer, while on the contrary, the influence of the topographic attributes on the deep layer was smaller than on the surface layer. Land use types and topographical elements work together on the soil moisture variability and vertical patterns at differing depths. This study provides an insight into policy making of land resource management and can be used in the modeling of hydrological processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxin Guo & Qiang Fu & Yanhong Hang & He Lu & Fengjie Gao & Jingbo Si, 2020. "Spatial Variability of Soil Moisture in Relation to Land Use Types and Topographic Features on Hillslopes in the Black Soil (Mollisols) Area of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3552-:d:350884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prabhavathy Settu & Mangayarkarasi Ramaiah, 2024. "Estimation of Sentinel-1 derived soil moisture using modified Dubois model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29677-29693, November.
    2. Theophilus Atio Abalori & Wenxia Cao & Conrad Atogi-Akwoa Weobong & Wen Li & Shilin Wang & Xiuxia Deng, 2022. "Spatial Vegetation Patch Patterns and Their Relation to Environmental Factors in the Alpine Grasslands of the Qilian Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Ohana-Levi, Noa & Mintz, Danielle Ferman & Hagag, Nave & Stern, Yossi & Munitz, Sarel & Friedman-Levi, Yael & Shacham, Nir & Grünzweig, José M. & Netzer, Yishai, 2022. "Grapevine responses to site-specific spatiotemporal factors in a Mediterranean climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Nguyen Duc Luong & Nguyen Hoang Hiep & Thi Hieu Bui, 2021. "Investigating the Spatio-Temporal Variation of Soil Moisture and Agricultural Drought towards Supporting Water Resources Management in the Red River Basin of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Muhammad Waseem Rasheed & Jialiang Tang & Abid Sarwar & Suraj Shah & Naeem Saddique & Muhammad Usman Khan & Muhammad Imran Khan & Shah Nawaz & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Marjan Aziz & Muhammad Sultan, 2022. "Soil Moisture Measuring Techniques and Factors Affecting the Moisture Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Siyue Sun & Guolin Zhang & Tieguang He & Shufang Song & Xingbiao Chu, 2021. "Effects of Landscape Positions and Landscape Types on Soil Properties and Chlorophyll Content of Citrus in a Sloping Orchard in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Benedetta Brunelli & Michaela Giglio & Elisa Magnani & Marco Dubbini, 2024. "Surface soil moisture estimate from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data in agricultural fields in areas of high vulnerability to climate variations: the Marche region (Italy) case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24083-24105, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3552-:d:350884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.