IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3237-d346442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Pattern of Wind Erosion on Unprotected Topsoil Replacement Sites in Mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Chuxin Zhu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 29 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiang Fan

    (School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 29 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhongke Bai

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 29 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Land Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

Abstract

Topsoil is required to be stripped and reused to maintain land productivity in mining and construction activities. However, as a great threat to unprotected soil, wind erosion on topsoil replacement sites has not received enough research attention, which hinders the efficient implementation of wind erosion control measures in the right time and place on a national scale. This study aims to evaluate wind erosion on unprotected topsoil replacement sites (WEUTRS) in mainland China, examining its spatiotemporal pattern and demonstrating its significance for the relevant research and industry. The WEUTRS was calculated by the Revised Wind Erosion Equation with meteorological data (1988–2017) and raster data of soil properties. The results showed a strong spatiotemporal heterogeneity of WEUTRS. The highest (>300 kg m −2 ) and the lowest (<0.5 kg m −2 ) WEUTRS appeared in Northwest and Central Southern China, respectively. The most drastic temporal change through the year was in Northwest China (as high as 335.4 kg m −2 on the example site), followed by Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and Shandong Province. By contrast, almost no temporal changes happened in Central Southern China. The ratio of monthly WEUTRS to respread the topsoil mass ( R w ) in Northwest China and Mongolia Plateau reached 10% or more in specific months, and less than 0.1% in most of Southern China. The WEUTRS quantification could be applied to the wind erosion control on topsoil replacement sites on both a national scale and a regional scale. The spatiotemporal pattern of WEUTRS may be a scientific basis for a nationwide or regionwide differentiated policy on the wind erosion control on topsoil replacement sites for policy makers, as well as the reference to the proper working schedule and the control measures for local mining and construction projects for management authorities and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuxin Zhu & Xiang Fan & Zhongke Bai, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Pattern of Wind Erosion on Unprotected Topsoil Replacement Sites in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3237-:d:346442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongling Guo & Ning Huang & Zhibao Dong & Robert Scott Van Pelt & Ted M. Zobeck, 2014. "Wind Erosion Induced Soil Degradation in Northern China: Status, Measures and Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Ronchi, Silvia & Salata, Stefano & Arcidiacono, Andrea & Piroli, Erika & Montanarella, Luca, 2019. "Policy instruments for soil protection among the EU member states: A comparative analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 763-780.
    3. Eran Feitelson & Erik Verhoef (ed.), 2001. "Transport and Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1780.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Scheper & Thomas Weninger & Barbara Kitzler & Lenka Lackóová & Wim Cornelis & Peter Strauss & Kerstin Michel, 2021. "Comparison of the Spatial Wind Erosion Patterns of Erosion Risk Mapping and Quantitative Modeling in Eastern Austria," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Shengbo Xie & Jianjun Qu & Qingjie Han & Yingjun Pang, 2020. "Wind Dynamic Environment and Wind Tunnel Simulation Experiment of Bridge Sand Damage in Xierong Section of Lhasa–Linzhi Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heleen C. Vos & Wolfgang Fister & Frank D. Eckardt & Anthony R. Palmer & Nikolaus J. Kuhn, 2020. "Physical Crust Formation on Sandy Soils and Their Potential to Reduce Dust Emissions from Croplands," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Francesca Peroni & Guglielmo Pristeri & Daniele Codato & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Massimo De Marchi, 2019. "Biotope Area Factor: An Ecological Urban Index to Geovisualize Soil Sealing in Padua, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Radu Lucian Pânzaru & Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Andi Ciobanu & Dragoș Mihai Medelete & Ramona Pîrvu, 2023. "Organic Agriculture in the Context of 2030 Agenda Implementation in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Alys Solly & Erblin Berisha & Giancarlo Cotella & Umberto Janin Rivolin, 2020. "How Sustainable Are Land Use Tools? A Europe-Wide Typological Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Jixian Mo & Jie Li & Ziying Wang & Ziwei Song & Jingyi Feng & Yanjing Che & Jiandong Rong & Siyu Gu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Wind Erosion and Ecological Service Assessments in Northern Songnen Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Lili Xu & Zhenfa Tu & Yuke Zhou & Guangming Yu, 2018. "Profiling Human-Induced Vegetation Change in the Horqin Sandy Land of China Using Time Series Datasets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Lucas, Karen, 2006. "Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 801-809, December.
    9. Dong Xia & Huiwen Nie & Lei Sun & Jing Wang & Kim-Chiu Chow & Kwing-Lam Chan & Donghai Wang, 2022. "Urbanization Effects on Surface Wind in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Using a Fan-Sector Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Pogliani, Laura & Ronchi, Silvia & Arcidiacono, Andrea & di Martino, Viviana & Mazza, Francesca, 2023. "Regeneration in an ecological perspective. Urban and territorial equalisation for the provision of ecosystem services in the Metropolitan City of Milan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Bartkowski, Bartosz & Droste, Nils & Ließ, Mareike & Sidemo-Holm, William & Weller, Ulrich & Brady, Mark V., 2021. "Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri-environmental schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Stefano Salata & Elisabetta Peccol & Oscar Borsato, 2019. "A Framework to Evaluate Land Take Control Policy Efficiency in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Nína M. Saviolidis & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Mariana Nicolau & Antonella Samoggia & Elise Huber & Laura Brimont & Matthew Gorton & David von Berlepsch & Hildigunnur Sigurdardottir & Margherita Del Prete , 2020. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Policy Tools in Support of Sustainable Food Consumption in Europe: Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Shuhan Gao & Jiaru Wu & Le Ma & Xiaoqian Gong & Qing Zhang, 2022. "Introduction to Sand-Restoration Technology and Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Stefano Salata & Bertan Arslan, 2022. "Designing with Ecosystem Modelling: The Sponge District Application in İzmir, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Stefano Salata, 2021. "The Utilization of Supervised Classification Sampling for Environmental Monitoring in Turin (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Ieromonachou, Petros & Warren, James, 2008. "Policy Packages as potential routes to urban road pricing in the UK," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 40, pages 106-123.
    18. Becker, Nir & Kimhi, Ayal & Argaman, Eli, 2020. "Costs and benefits of waste soils removal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Kees Maat & Paul de Vries, 2006. "The Influence of the Residential Environment on Green-Space Travel: Testing the Compensation Hypothesis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2111-2127, November.
    20. Kees Maat & Bert van Wee & Dominic Stead, 2005. "Land Use and Travel Behaviour: Expected Effects from the Perspective of Utility Theory and Activity-Based Theories," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(1), pages 33-46, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3237-:d:346442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.