IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3207-d345930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0—Awareness in South India

Author

Listed:
  • Leos Safar

    (Department of Banking and Investment, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Košice, Nemcovej 32, 04001 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Jakub Sopko

    (Department of Banking and Investment, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Košice, Nemcovej 32, 04001 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Darya Dancakova

    (Department of Banking and Investment, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Košice, Nemcovej 32, 04001 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Manuel Woschank

    (Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Erzherzog-Johann-Strasse 3/1, 8700 Leoben, Austria)

Abstract

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) approaches, frameworks, and technologies have gained an increasing relevance in order to gain sustainable and competitive advantages for industrial enterprises and for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), as well. Contrary to previous studies, which are mainly focused on companies, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey on inhabitants, in an attempt to examine general awareness about I4.0 concepts, in the region of South India. Our findings revealed a rather poor informational level of I4.0 concept and its components, which consequently leads to inadequate future actions and expectations. Moreover, respondents with prior information about I4.0 framework tend to have rather positive opinions and expectations of possible future trends. We emphasize that insufficient knowledge of the potential workforce regarding I4.0 concepts, especially in a region with ascending demographic development, can be considered as one of the main barriers for a successful and sustainable future development towards the 4th industrial revolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Leos Safar & Jakub Sopko & Darya Dancakova & Manuel Woschank, 2020. "Industry 4.0—Awareness in South India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3207-:d:345930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birgit Eberhard & Mickael Podio & Azucena Pérez Alonso & Evita Radovica & Lidija Avotina & Liga Peiseniece & Maria Caamaño Sendon & Alison Gonzales Lozano & Joan Solé-Pla, 2017. "Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth industrial revolution (I4.0)," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 10(3), pages 47-66, September.
    2. Schröder, Christian & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Kay, Rosemarie, 2015. "Bedeutung der Digitalisierung im Mittelstand," IfM-Materialien 244, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    3. Wolter, Marc Ingo & Mönnig, Anke & Hummel, Markus & Schneemann, Christian & Weber, Enzo & Zika, Gerd & Helmrich, Robert & Maier, Tobias & Neuber-Pohl, Caroline, 2015. "Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft : Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen," IAB-Forschungsbericht 201508, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghannouchi, Imen, 2023. "Examining the dynamic nexus between industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable economy: New insights from empirical evidence using GMM estimator across 20 OECD nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Icks, Annette & Schröder, Christian & Brink, Sigrun & Dienes, Christian & Schneck, Stefan, 2017. "Digitalisierungsprozesse von KMU im Produzierenden Gewerbe," IfM-Materialien 255, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    3. Su, Chi-Wei & Yuan, Xi & Umar, Muhammad & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona, 2022. "Does technological innovation bring destruction or creation to the labor market?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Brockhaus, Carsten Philipp & Bischoff, Thore Sören & Haverkamp, Katarzyna & Proeger, Till & Thonipara, Anita, 2020. "Digitalisierung von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen in Deutschland - ein Forschungsüberblick," Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung 46, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    5. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Eichhorst, Werner & Buhlmann, Florian, 2018. "Wie gesellschaftlicher Fortschritt die Arbeitsorganisation prägt," IZA Standpunkte 91, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Señoret, Andrés & Ramirez, Maria Inés & Rehner, Johannes, 2022. "Employment and sustainability: The relation between precarious work and spatial inequality in the neoliberal city," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Nielen, Sebastian & Kay, Rosemarie & Schröder, Christian, 2017. "Disruptive Innovationen: Chancen und Risiken für den Mittelstand," IfM-Materialien 259, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    9. Ratneswary Rasiah & Jason J Turner & Yew Foo HO, 2019. "The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Work Performance: Perceptions and Reflections from Academics in Malaysian Higher EducationObitat endiaest que," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 13(3), September.
    10. Lucio Cappelli & Antonella Pisano & Enrica Iannucci & Patrizia Papetti & Fabrizio D'Ascenzo & Roberto Ruggieri, 2024. "Digitalization and prevention of corruption: Opportunities and risks—Some evidence from the Italian university system," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 81-94, January.
    11. Kai-Michael Griese & Gerrit Hirschfeld & Simon Baringhorst, 2019. "Unternehmen zwischen Digitalisierung und Nachhaltigkeit – eine empirische Untersuchung," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 11-21, March.
    12. Atobishi Thabit & Nosratabadi Saeed, 2023. "Drivers and Constraints of Employee Satisfaction with Remote Work: An Empirical Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 56(2), pages 93-105, May.
    13. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo, 2021. "Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Bulelwa Makena & Bunmi Isaiah Omodan, 2022. "Digital influences on academic attainment: A case of one secondary school in a rural Education District," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 342-347, June.
    15. Serpil ÇİĞDEM, 2019. "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(77), pages 157-199, December.
    16. Welter Friederike & Schröder Christian, 2016. "Digitalisierung ja – Industrie 4.0 bislang unter Vorbehalt," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 059-065, May.
    17. Onoriode Collins POTOKRI, 2022. "Positioning African Women for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) Era: Insights for Women Students," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 6(1), pages 84-94, April.
    18. Jacqueline Brassey & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Csaba Huszka & Tobias Silberzahn & Nick van Dam, 2020. "Emotional flexibility and general self-efficacy: A pilot training intervention study with knowledge workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Rama Iyer, Subramanian & Sankaran, Harikumar & Walsh, Steve T., 2020. "Influence of Director Expertise on Capital Structure and Cash Holdings in High-Tech Firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Marc Stern & Michael Hinz & Wladislav Gawenko, 2023. "Digitale Transformation in Konzernlageberichten - Empirische Analyse der MDAX-Unternehmen fuer das Geschaeftsjahr 2021," Chemnitz Economic Papers 060, Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3207-:d:345930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.