IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2997-d343066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Creating for Locality and Sustainability: Design-Driven Community Regeneration Strategy in Shanghai’s Old Residential Context

Author

Listed:
  • Chenhan Jiang

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yiqi Xiao

    (College of Communication and Art Design, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Hongyi Cao

    (College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Community regeneration has drawn much attention in both the urban development and sustainable design fields in the last decade. As a response to the regeneration challenges of Shanghai’s old and high-density communities, this article proposes two design-driven strategies: enabling residents to become innovation protagonists and facilitating collaborative entrepreneurial clusters based on the reorganization of community resources. Two ongoing collaborative projects between the Siping community and Tongji University—Open Your Space microregeneration (OYS) and the Neighborhood of Innovation, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship Towards 2035 (NICE 2035) living labs project—are adopted as main case studies. Research findings are put forward through a structured analysis of qualitative data. Firstly, we reviewed the situation and sustainable goals for Shanghai’s old residential communities, and how design-centric social innovation and collaboration can be effective interventions. Secondly, we analyzed resident empowerment approaches to decision-making, co-design, and co-management processes in OYS with participatory observation. Finally, through participants’ interviews and key events analysis in NICE 2035, we investigated how living labs reuse community distributed resources to develop lifestyle-based business prototypes. The inquiry of this article proposes a co-creation mechanism and action guides towards localized and sustainable community regeneration, which can provide a contextual paradigm for similar challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenhan Jiang & Yiqi Xiao & Hongyi Cao, 2020. "Co-Creating for Locality and Sustainability: Design-Driven Community Regeneration Strategy in Shanghai’s Old Residential Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2997-:d:343066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lieselot Vandenbussche, 2018. "Mapping Stakeholders’ Relating Pathways in Collaborative Planning Processes; A Longitudinal Case Study of an Urban Regeneration Partnership," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 534-557, August.
    2. Shangyi Zhou & Shaobo Zhang, 2015. "Contextualism and Sustainability: A Community Renewal in Old City of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Mónica Degen & Marisol García, 2012. "The Transformation of the ‘Barcelona Model’: An Analysis of Culture, Urban Regeneration and Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1022-1038, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Zhidiankui Xu & Yu Wu & Yixi Bao & Jiawei Li & Zhengzhong Zhou, 2023. "Using Co-Design to Explore New Trends in Future Kitchen Designs: An Exploratory Workshop Study of College Students in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Pourzakarya, Maryam & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2021. "Community-led regeneration practice in Ghalam Gudeh District, Bandar Anzali, Iran: A participatory action research (PAR) Project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Yan Zhang & Chengliang Li & Jiajie Li & Zhiyuan Gao & Tianyu Su & Can Wang & Hexin Zhang & Teng Ma & Yang Liu & Weiting Xiong & Ronan Doorley & Luis Alonso & Yongqi Lou & Kent Larson, 2024. "Understanding street-level urban vibrancy via spatial-temporal Wi-Fi data analytics: Case LivingLine Shanghai," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(4), pages 803-822, May.
    5. Maria Rita Pinto & Serena Viola & Anna Onesti & Francesca Ciampa, 2020. "Artists Residencies, Challenges and Opportunities for Communities’ Empowerment and Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Meetiyagoda, Lakshika & Mahanama, P.K.S. & Ley, Astrid & Amarawickrama, Susantha, 2024. "Relationship between sense of place and co-creation process: A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Bowen Zhang & Weimin Guo & Zhaolian Xing & Ren Zhou, 2022. "Current Situation and Sustainable Renewal Strategies of Public Space in Chinese Old Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delclòs-Alió, Xavier & Miralles-Guasch, Carme, 2018. "Looking at Barcelona through Jane Jacobs’s eyes: Mapping the basic conditions for urban vitality in a Mediterranean conurbation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 505-517.
    2. Philip Lawton & Michael Punch, 2014. "Urban Governance and the ‘European City’: Ideals and Realities in Dublin, Ireland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 864-885, May.
    3. Xin Li & Shangyi Zhou, 2018. "The Trialectics of Spatiality: The Labeling of a Historical Area in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Mehdipanah, Roshanak & Manzano, Ana & Borrell, Carme & Malmusi, Davide & Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica & Greenhalgh, Joanne & Muntaner, Carles & Pawson, Ray, 2015. "Exploring complex causal pathways between urban renewal, health and health inequality using a theory-driven realist approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 266-274.
    6. Jiayin Zhang & Mingliang Lin & Min Wang & Yinbin Lin, 2023. "Scale transformation of place brands: a visual study of Xinhepu, Guangzhou," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2019. "What Is the Critical Factor and Relationship of Urban Regeneration in a Historic District?: A Case of the Nanluoguxiang Area in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Joaquim Rius Ulldemolins, 2014. "Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes: Place branding in central Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 3026-3045, November.
    9. Jun Jiang & Tongguang Zang & Jianglong Xing & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Urban Heritage and Landscape Approach to Urban Contextual Continuity: The Case of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Kexi Xu & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Guiwen Liu & Igor Martek, 2019. "Demolition of Existing Buildings in Urban Renewal Projects: A Decision Support System in the China Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.
    12. Greig Charnock & Thomas F. Purcell & Ramon Ribera-Fumaz, 2014. "City of Rents: The limits to the Barcelona model of urban competitiveness," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 198-217, January.
    13. Li, Dezhi & Du, Bingzhen & Zhu, Jin, 2021. "Evaluating old community renewal based on emergy analysis: A case study of Nanjing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    14. Stadler Benz, Philippe & Stauffacher, Michael, 2023. "A systemic approach to the transformation of swiss railway stations: Mind the gap between the local, short-term and national, long-term worldviews," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 99-111.
    15. Jue Wang & Yi Yang & Huan Huang & Fan Wang, 2022. "Stakeholder Management in Government-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Eastern Suburbs in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Alba Griffin & Alexandra Young, 2023. "Violence against a backdrop of colours? Ethnographic insights into tensions between urban transformation and ongoing violence in marginalised neighbourhoods," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(7), pages 1351-1373, November.
    17. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2021. "Perception Difference and Conflicts of Stakeholders in the Urban Regeneration Project: A Case Study of Nanluoguxiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Thorsten Schuetze & Lorenzo Chelleri, 2015. "Urban Sustainability Versus Green-Washing—Fallacy and Reality of Urban Regeneration in Downtown Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2997-:d:343066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.