IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2766-d339771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Negotiation Approach to Support the Strategies Alignment Process in Collaborative Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Andres

    (Research Centre on Production Management and Engineering (CIGIP), Universitat Politècnica de València, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Alcoy, Calle Alarcón, 03801 Alcoy, Spain)

  • Vicente Javier Blanes

    (Industrial Engineer, by the Universitat Politecnica de València Alcoy, Calle Benimarfull, 03802 Alcoy, Spain)

Abstract

This paper proposes a negotiation approach to support the strategies alignment (SA) collaborative process. The negotiation approach is presented as a complementary mechanism to deal with the SA process. The strategies alignment negotiation approach (SA-NA) considers three different levels of collaboration, which differ by the accurateness of information and amount of data exchanged among the collaborative enterprises. Accordingly, three negotiation processes are proposed, equivalent to the three collaboration levels identified. This paper describes from a conceptual and mathematical point of views the phases of the SA-NA to carry out at each collaboration level. The SA-NA enables users to identify aligned strategies to be activated by the collaborative network (CN) partners. The main aim of the SA-NA is to identify those aligned strategies that satisfy all the CN enterprises, allowing users to achieve the objectives and performance levels required at the enterprises’ level while the network performance is maximized. The SA-NA enables CN partners to negotiate and achieve a suitable solution for all the CN enterprises, promoting sustainable collaboration among the partners participating in the CN through the activation of aligned strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Andres & Vicente Javier Blanes, 2020. "A Negotiation Approach to Support the Strategies Alignment Process in Collaborative Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2766-:d:339771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2766/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2766/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yani Rahmawati & Christiono Utomo & Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi, 2019. "BIM and E-Negotiation Practices in AEC Consulting Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Dudek, Gregor & Stadtler, Hartmut, 2005. "Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 668-687, June.
    3. Schneeweiss, Christoph, 2003. "Distributed decision making in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 71-83, April.
    4. Anca-Maria Clipa & Cătălin-Ioan Clipa & Magdalena Danileț & Andreia Gabriela Andrei, 2019. "Enhancing Sustainable Employment Relationships: An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Trust in Employer and Subjective Value in Employment Contract Negotiations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Pibernik, Richard & Sucky, Eric, 2007. "An approach to inter-domain master planning in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 200-212, July.
    6. Mark Goetschalckx & Bernhard Fleischmann, 2005. "Strategic Network Planning," Springer Books, in: Hartmut Stadtler & Christoph Kilger (ed.), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, edition 0, chapter 6, pages 117-137, Springer.
    7. Jinsoo Park & Hamirahanim Abdul Rahman & Jihae Suh & Hazami Hussin, 2019. "A Study of Integrative Bargaining Model with Argumentation-Based Negotiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2003. "Supply chain scheduling: Batching and delivery," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 566-584, August.
    9. Li, Xiuhui & Wang, Qinan, 2007. "Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Xiaoyi Liu & Zhenzhong Ma & Dapeng Liang, 2019. "Personality Effects on the Endorsement of Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies: Business Ethics in Canada and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Maria Teresa Pereira & Florinda Figueiredo Martins & Dominik Zimon, 2018. "Assessment of Circular Economy within Portuguese Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatriz Andres & Raul Poler, 2020. "An Information Management Conceptual Approach for the Strategies Alignment Collaborative Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kovács, András & Egri, Péter & Kis, Tamás & Váncza, József, 2013. "Inventory control in supply chains: Alternative approaches to a two-stage lot-sizing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 385-394.
    2. G. Rius-Sorolla & J. Maheut & S. Estellés-Miguel & J. P. Garcia-Sabater, 2020. "Coordination mechanisms with mathematical programming models for decentralized decision-making: a literature review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 61-104, March.
    3. Siao-Leu Phouratsamay & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Fanny Pascual, 2021. "Coordination of a two-level supply chain with contracts," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 235-264, June.
    4. Weraikat, Dua & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi & Lehoux, Nadia, 2016. "Two-echelon pharmaceutical reverse supply chain coordination with customers incentives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 41-52.
    5. Egri, Péter & Kis, Tamás & Kovács, András & Váncza, József, 2014. "An inverse economic lot-sizing approach to eliciting supplier cost parameters," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 80-88.
    6. Boulaksil, Youssef & Fransoo, Jan C., 2009. "Order release strategies to control outsourced operations in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 149-160, May.
    7. Walther, Grit & Schmid, Eberhard & Spengler, Thomas S., 2008. "Negotiation-based coordination in product recovery networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 334-350, February.
    8. Wafa Ben Yahia & Omar Ayadi & Faouzi Masmoudi, 2017. "A fuzzy-based negotiation approach for collaborative planning in manufacturing supply chains," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(8), pages 1987-2006, December.
    9. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    10. Lee, Sangjoon & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Yoo, Seung Ho, 2024. "Multi-period quality and pricing decision in production-focused and market-focused supply chains: How to manage a long-term contractual relationship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Yan, Xiaoming & Zhang, Minghui & Liu, Ke, 2010. "A note on coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 469-478, September.
    12. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2020. "Supplier–carrier–buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier–buyer partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Preil, Deniz & Krapp, Michael, 2022. "Bandit-based inventory optimisation: Reinforcement learning in multi-echelon supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    15. Cao, Zong-Hong & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Zhao, Ju & Li, Chang-Wen, 2015. "Entry mode selection and its impact on an incumbent supply chain coordination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    17. Sun Lee, Ik & Yoon, S.H., 2010. "Coordinated scheduling of production and delivery stages with stage-dependent inventory holding costs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 509-521, December.
    18. Yunqiang Yin & Doudou Li & Dujuan Wang & T. C. E. Cheng, 2021. "Single-machine serial-batch delivery scheduling with two competing agents and due date assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 497-523, March.
    19. Ullrich, Christian A., 2013. "Integrated machine scheduling and vehicle routing with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 152-165.
    20. Ramanathan, Usha & Muyldermans, Luc, 2010. "Identifying demand factors for promotional planning and forecasting: A case of a soft drink company in the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 538-545, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2766-:d:339771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.