IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2436-d334806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Bridge Infrastructure Using 6D BIM

Author

Listed:
  • Sakdirat Kaewunruen

    (School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Jessada Sresakoolchai

    (School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Zhihao Zhou

    (School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

Abstract

A number of bridge infrastructures are rising significantly due to economic expansion and growing numbers of railway and road infrastructures. Owing to the complexity of bridge design, traditional design methods always create tedious and time-consuming construction processes. In recent years, Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been developed rapidly to provide a faster solution to generate and process the integration of information in a shared environment. This paper aims to highlight an innovative 6D BIM approach for the lifecycle asset management of a bridge infrastructure by using Donggou Bridge as a case study. This paper adopts 6D modelling, incorporating 3D model information with time schedule, cost estimation, and carbon footprint analysis across the lifecycle of the bridge project. The results of this paper reveal that raw materials contribute the most embodied carbon emissions, and as the 6D BIM model was developed in the early stage of the lifecycle, stakeholders can collaborate within the BIM environment to enhance a more sustainable and cost-effective outcome in advance. This study also demonstrates the possibility of BIM applications to bridge infrastructure projects throughout the whole lifecycle. The 6D BIM can save time by transforming 2D information to 3D information and reducing errors during the pre-construction and construction stages through better visualisation for staff training. Moreover, 6D BIM can promote efficient asset and project management since it can be applied for various purposes simultaneously, such as sustainability, lifecycle asset management and maintenance, condition monitoring and real-time structural simulations. In addition, BIM can promote cooperation among working parties and improve visualisation of the project for various stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Zhihao Zhou, 2020. "Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Bridge Infrastructure Using 6D BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2436-:d:334806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Lalida Kerinnonta, 2019. "Potential Reconstruction Design of an Existing Townhouse in Washington DC for Approaching Net Zero Energy Building Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angelo Ciccone & Pompilio Suglia & Domenico Asprone & Antonio Salzano & Maurizio Nicolella, 2022. "Defining a Digital Strategy in a BIM Environment to Manage Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges in the Context of Italian Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Agnieszka Leśniak & Monika Górka & Izabela Skrzypczak, 2021. "Barriers to BIM Implementation in Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Projects—The Polish Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Shijie Peng & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2020. "Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Fang, Zigeng & Yan, Jiayi & Lu, Qiuchen & Chen, Long & Yang, Pu & Tang, Junqing & Jiang, Feng & Broyd, Tim & Hong, Jingke, 2023. "A systematic literature review of carbon footprint decision-making approaches for infrastructure and building projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    5. Ahmad Jrade & Farnaz Jalaei & Jieying Jane Zhang & Saeed Jalilzadeh Eirdmousa & Farzad Jalaei, 2023. "Potential Integration of Bridge Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment/Life Cycle Costing Tools for Infrastructure Projects within Construction 4.0: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Mingjun Ma & Ziqiao Li & Kai Xue & Meng Liu, 2021. "Exergy-Based Life Cycle Assessment Model for Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Bridge: Principle and Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Wentao Ma & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2021. "Digital Twin Aided Vulnerability Assessment and Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Bridge Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Juan Francisco Fernández Rodríguez, 2023. "Sustainable Design Protocol in BIM Environments: Case Study of 3D Virtual Models of a Building in Seville (Spain) Based on BREEAM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafaela Bortolini & Raul Rodrigues & Hamidreza Alavi & Luisa Felix Dalla Vecchia & Núria Forcada, 2022. "Digital Twins’ Applications for Building Energy Efficiency: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska & Maria Kubacka & Joanna Woźniak & Jan Polaszczyk, 2022. "Analysis of Residential Buildings in Poland for Potential Energy Renovation toward Zero-Emission Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Jaromir Vrbka & Tomas Krulicky & Tomas Brabenec & Jan Hejda, 2020. "Determining the Increase in a Building’s Appreciation Rate Due to a Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Kyung-Hwan Ji & Hyun-Kook Shin & Seungwoo Han & Jae-Hun Jo, 2020. "A Statistical Approach for Predicting Airtightness in Residential Units of Reinforced Concrete Apartment Buildings in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Lauren Etxepare & Iñigo Leon & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Lizundia & Eneko Jokin Uranga, 2020. "Advanced Intervention Protocol in the Energy Rehabilitation of Heritage Buildings: A Miñones Barracks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, August.
    6. Xinman Guo & Sunliang Cao & Yang Xu & Xiaolin Zhu, 2021. "The Feasibility of Using Zero-Emission Electric Boats to Enhance the Techno-Economic Performance of an Ocean-Energy-Supported Coastal Hotel Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-42, December.
    7. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Shijie Peng & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2020. "Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Hernández, José L. & de Miguel, Ignacio & Vélez, Fredy & Vasallo, Ali, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities in European smart buildings energy management: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. do Amaral, J.V.S. & dos Santos, C.H. & Montevechi, J.A.B. & de Queiroz, A.R., 2023. "Energy Digital Twin applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Wentao Ma & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2021. "Digital Twin Aided Vulnerability Assessment and Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Bridge Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2436-:d:334806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.