IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1790-d325929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing an Adaptive Pathway to Mitigate Air Pollution Risk for Vulnerable Groups in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Sugyeong Park

    (Department of Climatic Environment, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Sea Jin Kim

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Hangnan Yu

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea
    Wetland Research Center of Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China)

  • Chul-Hee Lim

    (Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Eunbeen Park

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Jiwon Kim

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Woo-Kyun Lee

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anamro, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the most significant environmental hazards. The elderly, young, and poor are more vulnerable to air pollution. The risk of air pollution was assessed based on the risk framework published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in terms of three aspects: hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. This study determined the concentrations of hazardous pollutants using satellite images from 2015 at 1 km 2 spatial resolution. In addition, the study identified vulnerable groups who are exposed to hazardous air pollutants. The study highlighted the degree of vulnerability based on environmental sensitivity and institutional abilities, such as mitigation and social adaption policies, using statistical data. Based on the results, Seoul City and Gyeonggi Province have low air pollution risk owing to good institutional abilities, while the western coastal area has the highest air pollution risk. Three adaption pathway scenarios were assessed in terms of the effect of increases in the budget for social adaptation policies on the level of risk. The study found that the risk can be reduced when the social adaptation budget of 2015 base level is increased by 20% in Gyeonggi Province and by 30% in the western coastal area. In conclusion, this risk assessment can support policy-making to target more vulnerable groups based on scientific evidence and to ensure environmental justice at the national level.

Suggested Citation

  • Sugyeong Park & Sea Jin Kim & Hangnan Yu & Chul-Hee Lim & Eunbeen Park & Jiwon Kim & Woo-Kyun Lee, 2020. "Developing an Adaptive Pathway to Mitigate Air Pollution Risk for Vulnerable Groups in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1790-:d:325929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bae‐Gyoon Park, 2008. "Uneven Development, Inter‐scalar Tensions, and the Politics of Decentralization in South Korea," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 40-59, March.
    2. Taalbi, Josef, 2017. "What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1437-1453.
    3. Masset, Edoardo, 2011. "A review of hunger indices and methods to monitor country commitment to fighting hunger," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 102-108, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sea Jin Kim & Woo-Kyun Lee & Jun Young Ahn & Wona Lee & Soo Jeong Lee, 2021. "Analysis of Developmental Chronology of South Korean Compressed Growth as a Reference from Sustainable Development Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Dohyeong Kim & Hee-Eun Choi & Won-Mo Gal & SungChul Seo, 2020. "Five Year Trends of Particulate Matter Concentrations in Korean Regions (2015–2019): When to Ventilate?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bokyong Shin & Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2021. "Media and the Meanings of Land: A South Korean Case Study," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 381-425, March.
    2. Monica Violeta Achim & Alexandra Ioana Daniela Rus & Nawazish Mirza, 2024. "How does intellectual capital spur innovation in economy? A cross-country survey," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3125-3154, December.
    3. Aurel Burciu & Rozalia Kicsi & Simona Buta & Mihaela State & Iulia Burlac & Denisa Alexandra Chifan & Beatrice Ipsalat, 2023. "The Study of the Relationship among GCI, GII, Disruptive Technology, and Social Innovations in MNCs: How Do We Evaluate Financial Innovations Made by Firms? A Preliminary Inquiry," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-42, August.
    4. Yunpeng Sun & Ruoya Jia & Asif Razzaq & Qun Bao, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Drivers of China’s geographical renewable energy development: evidence from spatial association network structure approaches," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4115-4163, December.
    5. Baxter, David & Trott, Paul & Ellwood, Paul, 2023. "Reconceptualising innovation failure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    6. Ferdy F. F. Nuus & Petra C. M. Neessen & Cosmina L. Voinea & Marjolein C. J. Caniëls, 2022. "Sustainable Innovation in the Financial Sector during the Corona Crisis: How Discontinuity Affects Sustainable Innovation, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Matjaž Uršič & Blaž Križnik, 2012. "Comparing urban renewal in Barcelona and Seoul—urban management in conditions of competition among global cities," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 21-39, May.
    8. Tetiana Serediuk & Yurii Vdovychenko, 2018. "Common Features And Distinctions Between High Technology And Innovation," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
    9. Hyun Bang Shin & Soo-Hyun Kim, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 540-559, February.
    10. Catherine Laroche-Dupraz & Marilyne Huchet-Bourdon & Anned-Linz Senadin, 2012. "Impact du taux de change sur la sécurité alimentaire des pays en développement," Post-Print hal-02746844, HAL.
    11. M. Huchet Bourdon & C. Laroche Dupraz, 2014. "National food security: a framework for public policy and international trade," FOODSECURE Working papers 17, LEI Wageningen UR.
    12. Yan, Hong-Bin & Li, Ming, 2022. "Consumer demand based recombinant search for idea generation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Wineman, Ayala, 2016. "Multidimensional Household Food Security Measurement in Rural Zambia," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 55(3), September.
    14. Khraisha, Tamer, 2020. "Complex economic problems and fitness landscapes: Assessment and methodological perspectives," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 390-407.
    15. Germán Forero-Cantor & Javier Ribal & Neus Sanjuán, 2020. "Measuring regional differences in food security from access and stability dimensions: A methodological proposal based on elasticities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(3), pages 112-119.
    16. Joachim De Weerdt & Kathleen Beegle & Jed Friedman & John Gibson, 2016. "The Challenge of Measuring Hunger through Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(4), pages 727-758.
    17. Karen Núñez Valdés & Susana Quirós y Alpera & Luis Manuel Cerdá Suárez, 2021. "An Institutional Perspective for Evaluating Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Insights from the Chilean Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2014. "On the composite indicators for food security: Decisions matter!," MPRA Paper 58955, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Vasilii Erokhin, 2017. "Self-Sufficiency versus Security: How Trade Protectionism Challenges the Sustainability of the Food Supply in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    20. te Lintelo, Dolf J.H. & Haddad, Lawrence J. & Leavy, Jennifer & Lakshman, Rajith, 2014. "Measuring the commitment to reduce hunger: A hunger reduction commitment index," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 115-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1790-:d:325929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.