IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p797-d311643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of Policy Concerning the Readjustment of Inefficient Urban Land Use in China Based on a Content Analysis Method

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Bai

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wei Zhou

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China
    Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration in Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanjun Guan

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xue Li

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Baohua Huang

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Fengchun Lei

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Hong Yang

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Wenmin Huo

    (Chinese Academy of Natural Resource Economics, Beijing 101149, China)

Abstract

In a 21st century context characterized by the inefficient use of urban construction land, to optimize land use structure and transform resource utilization methods, it is necessary for the Chinese government to improve land use efficiency. Promoting the readjustment of inefficient urban land use has become essential. The purpose of this paper is to sort through the policies addressing the readjustment of inefficient urban land use in China, identify the promulgation date, longitudinal hierarchy, and horizontal composition of the relevant policies, and summarize the evolutionary trend of such policies. This study aims to provide a reference for the adjustment and improvement of relevant policy systems in China. The content analysis method was used in this study, and NVivo 12 software was used to compare and verify the analysis process. The results show the following: (1) A large number of relevant policies have been promulgated, with a total of 12 items from 1988 to 2012, increasing to six items annually on average from 2013 to 2019. The Communist Party of China Central Committee, the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic, the State Council and relevant ministries promulgated 13.46%, 11.54%, 28.85%, and 46.15%, respectively, of the relevant policies. (2) The existing policies are mostly issued in the form of notices, opinions, management regulations, etc.; therefore, their level of effectiveness is low, and the role of norms is weak. (3) Finally, the policy content experienced stages of initial exploration, basic establishment, and continuous improvement. It also covered aspects such as Standard Control, Market Configuration, Overall Planning, Incentive Mechanisms, Income Distribution, and Supervision Evaluation. The system for policies addressing readjustment of inefficient urban land use has basically been perfected, although post approval supervision still needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the process of readjusting inefficient urban land use should be optimized, new modes of readjustment should be constantly explored, and inefficient land use should be addressed across the entire territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Bai & Wei Zhou & Yanjun Guan & Xue Li & Baohua Huang & Fengchun Lei & Hong Yang & Wenmin Huo, 2020. "Evolution of Policy Concerning the Readjustment of Inefficient Urban Land Use in China Based on a Content Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:797-:d:311643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel M. Ahlfeldt & Wolfgang Maennig & Felix J. Richter, 2017. "Urban renewal after the Berlin Wall: a place-based policy evaluation," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 129-156.
    2. William J. Collins & Katharine L. Shester, 2013. "Slum Clearance and Urban Renewal in the United States," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 239-273, January.
    3. Richter, Felix & Ahlfeldt, Gabriel & Maennig, Wolfgang, 2013. "Urban renewal after the Berlin Wall," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79789, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Ozan Karaman, 2013. "Urban Renewal in I stanbul: Reconfigured Spaces, Robotic Lives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 715-733, March.
    5. Zoltán Kovács & Reinhard Wiessner & Romy Zischner, 2013. "Urban Renewal in the Inner City of Budapest: Gentrification from a Post-socialist Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(1), pages 22-38, January.
    6. Holtslag-Broekhof, Sanne, 2018. "Urban land readjustment: Necessary for effective urban renewal? Analysing the Dutch quest for new legislation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 821-828.
    7. Lin Chen & Chunying Ren & Bai Zhang & Zongming Wang & Mingyue Liu, 2018. "Quantifying Urban Land Sprawl and its Driving Forces in Northeast China from 1990 to 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Marija Burinskienė & Vytautas Bielinskas & Askoldas Podviezko & Virginija Gurskienė & Vida Maliene, 2017. "Evaluating the Significance of Criteria Contributing to Decision-Making on Brownfield Land Redevelopment Strategies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Li, Wenbo & Wang, Dongyan & Li, Hong & Wang, Jianguo & Zhu, Yuanli & Yang, Yuewen, 2019. "Quantifying the spatial arrangement of underutilized land in a rapidly urbanized rust belt city: The case of Changchun City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 113-123.
    10. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Frank T. Lorne, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Renewal and Built Heritage Conservation in a Global Real Estate Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Shasha Lu & Xingliang Guan & Chao He & Jiali Zhang, 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Ziming Liu & Lan Zhang & Jens Rommel & Shuyi Feng, 2020. "Do land markets improve land-use efficiency? evidence from Jiangsu, China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 317-330, January.
    13. Zhiyong Yi & Guiwen Liu & Wei Lang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2017. "Strategic Approaches to Sustainable Urban Renewal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Marie-Hélène Bacqué & Carole Biewener, 2013. "Different Manifestations of the Concept of Empowerment: The Politics of Urban Renewal in the United States and the United Kingdom," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2198-2213, November.
    15. Power, Anne, 2008. "Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4487-4501, December.
    16. Taozhi Zhuang & Queena K. Qian & Henk J. Visscher & Marja G. Elsinga, 2017. "Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Yaolin Liu & Enxiang Cai & Ying Jing & Jie Gong & Zhengyu Wang, 2018. "Analyzing the Decoupling between Rural-to-Urban Migrants and Urban Land Expansion in Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Yunfei Peng & Jing Qian & Fu Ren & Wenhui Zhang & Qingyun Du, 2016. "Sustainability of Land Use Promoted by Construction-to-Ecological Land Conversion: A Case Study of Shenzhen City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Guiwen Liu & Zhiyong Yi & Xiaoling Zhang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek & Lizhen Wei, 2017. "An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Kexi Xu & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Guiwen Liu & Igor Martek, 2019. "Demolition of Existing Buildings in Urban Renewal Projects: A Decision Support System in the China Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    21. Joana Almeida & José Antunes Ferreira & Beatriz Condessa & Ricardo Tomé, 2018. "Improving land readjustment practice. Application of management models to Portugal," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1431-1449, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robetmi Jumpakita Pinem & Ancilla Katherina Kustedjo & Yelita Anggiane Iskandar & Bernardo Nugroho Yahya, 2023. "Investigation of Smart Sustainable City Indicators of Sustainable Development—A Case Study of the City of Suwon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Manuel E. Morales & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Theoretical Research on Circular Economy and Sustainability Trade-Offs and Synergies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Ning Geng & Mengyao Wang & Zengjin Liu, 2022. "Farmland Transfer, Scale Management and Economies of Scale Assessment: Evidence from the Main Grain-Producing Shandong Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Mingzhi Zhang & Hongyu Liu & Yangyue Su & Xiangyu Zhou & Zhaocheng Li & Chao Chen, 2022. "Assessment and Decomposition of Regional Land Use Efficiency of the Service Sector in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Guoqing Cui & Wenlong Zheng & Siliang Chen & Yue Dong & Tingyu Huang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Pattern Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Inefficient Urban Land Use in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Milad Pira, 2021. "A novel taxonomy of smart sustainable city indicators," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvain Chareyron & Florence Goffette-Nagot & Lucie Letrouit, 2019. "Impacts of a French urban renewal program on local housing markets," Post-Print halshs-02353718, HAL.
    2. Bing Xia & Jindong Wu & Jiaqi Wang & Yitao Fang & Haodi Shen & Jingli Shen, 2021. "Sustainable Renewal Methods of Urban Public Parking Spaces under the Scenario of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAV): A Review and a Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Junpai Chen & Yue Chen & Yitong Zhu & Mingyan Xiao & Hongfei Yang & Huaming Huang & Linli Li, 2023. "Assessing the Sustainability of Urban Community Renewal Projects in Southern China Based on a Hybrid MADM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-33, February.
    4. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Koster, Hans R.A. & van Ommeren, Jos & Volkhausen, Nicolas, 2021. "Short-term rentals and the housing market: Quasi-experimental evidence from Airbnb in Los Angeles," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Albanese, Giuseppe & Ciani, Emanuele & de Blasio, Guido, 2021. "Anything new in town? The local effects of urban regeneration policies in Italy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Chareyron, Sylvain & Goffette-Nagot, Florence & Letrouit, Lucie, 2022. "Externalities from urban renewal: Evidence from a French program," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Biao Zhang & Dian Shao & Zhonghu Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Dynamic, Effect and Governance Policy of Construction Land Use in Urban Agglomeration: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, May.
    10. Xu, Hangtian, 2017. "Spatial Reorganization in Urban Redevelopment: Evidence from an Earthquake in a Metropolitan Area," MPRA Paper 78986, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    13. Blanco, Hector & Neri, Lorenzo, 2023. "Knocking It Down and Mixing It Up: The Impact of Public Housing Regenerations," IZA Discussion Papers 15855, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Xizan Jin & Tachia Chin & Junli Yu & Yanjiang Zhang & Yingshuang Shi, 2020. "How Government’s Policy Implementation Methods Influence Urban Villagers’ Acceptance of Urban Revitalization Programs: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Gabriel M. Ahlfeldt & Wolfgang Maennig & Felix J. Richter, 2017. "Zoning in reunified Berlin," Working Papers 059, Chair for Economic Policy, University of Hamburg.
    16. Monika Streule & Ozan Karaman & Lindsay Sawyer & Christian Schmid, 2020. "Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing Urbanization Processes Beyond Informality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 652-672, July.
    17. Uzun, Bayram & Atasoy, Bura Adem & Celik Simsek, Nida, 2022. "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) support for subdivision phase of land readjustment: A case study from Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Kristoffer Moeller, 2018. "Culturally clustered or in the cloud? How amenities drive firm location decision in Berlin," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 728-758, September.
    19. Song, Yang & Lyu, Yang & Qian, Sitong & Zhang, Xinjia & Lin, Huiying & Wang, Shijun, 2022. "Identifying urban candidate brownfield sites using multi-source data: The case of Changchun City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Yuan Ma & Heng Liang & Han Li & Yaping Liao, 2020. "Towards the Healthy Community: Residents’ Perceptions of Integrating Urban Agriculture into the Old Community Micro-Transformation in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:797-:d:311643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.