IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1072-d315852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability: Nutrition and Dietetic Students’ Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Burkhart

    (School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4557, Australia)

  • Michele Verdonck

    (School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4557, Australia)

  • Theresa Ashford

    (School of Social Science, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4557, Australia)

  • Judith Maher

    (School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4557, Australia)

Abstract

Opportunities exist for nutrition and dietetic (N&D) professionals to contribute to sustainable development and support actions towards the attainment of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SGD’s). Students undertaking higher education are well-placed to develop skills and capabilities in creative and critical problem solving for sustainability. However, there is limited literature exploring nutrition and dietetic students’ perceptions of sustainability that would help to inform an effective and constructively aligned embedding of sustainability content and active learning opportunities into curriculum. This descriptive cohort study design utilised a 17-question online survey to explore 95 Australian N&D undergraduate students’ self-reported familiarity with and perceived importance of sustainability and related concepts, and view of sustainability for future practice. Participants reported being more familiar with the term environmental sustainability and related concepts than economic or social sustainability. Varying levels of familiarity of 42 sustainability related concepts within economic resilience, environmental integrity, social development and cross-cutting issues were reported. Most participants (82%, n = 78) reported sustainability was very important in general (82%, n = 78), and for professional practice (63%, n = 60). Over half of the participants identified government led initiatives to address the future of society (65%, n = 71). Our study highlights the complexity of sustainability in a discipline specific context and the need for understanding students’ perceptions of sustainability to inform N&D curriculum design.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Burkhart & Michele Verdonck & Theresa Ashford & Judith Maher, 2020. "Sustainability: Nutrition and Dietetic Students’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-9, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1072-:d:315852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Bollani & Alessandro Bonadonna & Giovanni Peira, 2019. "The Millennials’ Concept of Sustainability in the Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Beatriz Damico & José María Aulicino & Jorgelina Di Pasquale, 2022. "What Does Sustainability Mean? Perceptions of Future Professionals across Disciplines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Andrea Beatriz Damico & Margherita Masi & José María Aulicino & Yari Vecchio & Jorgelina Di Pasquale, 2022. "The Knowledge and Perception of Sustainability in Livestock Systems: Evidence from Future Professionals in Italy and Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Katherine Kent & Denis Visentin & Corey Peterson & Carmen Primo & Catherine Elliott & Margaret Otlowski & Sandra Murray, 2021. "The Perceived Importance and Intended Purchasing Patterns of Sustainable Foods in Australian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Lena D. Stephens & Judi Porter & Mark Lawrence, 2021. "Healthy and Environmentally Sustainable Food Procurement and Foodservice in Australian Aged Care and Healthcare Services: A Scoping Review of Current Research and Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Bianca Pocol & Valentina Marinescu & Antonio Amuza & Roxana-Larisa Cadar & Anda Anca Rodideal, 2020. "Sustainable vs. Unsustainable Food Consumption Behaviour: A Study among Students from Romania, Bulgaria and Moldova," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Irene (Eirini) Kamenidou & Aikaterini Stavrianea & Evangelia-Zoi Bara, 2020. "Generational Differences toward Organic Food Behavior: Insights from Five Generational Cohorts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Canova, Luciano & Paladino, Giovanna, 2022. "How personality traits affect the way Gen Z faces economic and environmental sustainability: an econometric investigation," MPRA Paper 111889, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Garyfallos Fragidis & Kyriakos Riskos & Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou, 2022. "Designing the Tourist Journey for the Advancement of Sustainable Tourist Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Yefan Nian & Zhifeng Gao & Ruojin Zhao, 2023. "Are people's daily life habits consistent with their preference for food sustainability labels?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 589-622, July.
    6. Giovanni Peira & Damiano Cortese & Giampiero Lombardi & Luigi Bollani, 2020. "Grass-Fed Milk Perception: Profiling Italian Consumer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Ioanna Apostolidou & Foivos Anastasiadis & Anastasios Michailidis, 2018. "Consumer Perceived Value to Traceability System in Food Supply Chains: iGeneration vs Millennials," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(2), January.
    8. José-Luis Godos-Díez & Roberto Fernández-Gago & Laura Cabeza-García, 2019. "How Does Reciprocity Affect Undergraduate Student Orientation towards Stakeholders?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Casamassima, Alessia & Perdiguero Garcia, Jordi & Morone, Andrea, 2021. "Investigate the energy misperception for "Next Generation" in Italy: An online experiment," MPRA Paper 110637, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Canova, Luciano & Paladino, Giovanna, 2023. "Gen Z, Personality Traits and Sustainability Awareness: An Econometric Investigation," MPRA Paper 115960, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. William Quezado de F. Cavalcante & Arnaldo Coelho & Cristela Maia Bairrada, 2021. "Sustainability and Tourism Marketing: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications between 1997 and 2020 Using VOSviewer Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Andrea Beatriz Damico & José María Aulicino & Jorgelina Di Pasquale, 2022. "What Does Sustainability Mean? Perceptions of Future Professionals across Disciplines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Andrea Beatriz Damico & Margherita Masi & José María Aulicino & Yari Vecchio & Jorgelina Di Pasquale, 2022. "The Knowledge and Perception of Sustainability in Livestock Systems: Evidence from Future Professionals in Italy and Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Eloi Jorge & Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras & Maria Beatriz Gonzalez-Sanchez, 2020. "The Importance Given to Food Naturalness Attributes by Millennial University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1072-:d:315852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.