IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10522-d462875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant Processes Efficiency Using Statistical Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Młyński

    (Department of Sanitary Engineering and Water Management, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Cracow, 30-059 Cracow, Poland)

  • Anna Młyńska

    (Department of Water Supply, Sewerage and Environmental Monitoring, Faculty of Environmental and Power Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Chmielowski

    (Department of Sanitary Engineering and Water Management, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Cracow, 30-059 Cracow, Poland)

  • Jan Pawełek

    (Department of Sanitary Engineering and Water Management, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Cracow, 30-059 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

The paper presents modelling of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) operation work efficiency using a two-stage method based on selected probability distributions and the Monte Carlo method. Calculations were carried out in terms of sewage susceptibility to biodegradability. Pollutant indicators in raw sewage and in sewage after mechanical treatment and biological treatment were analysed: BOD 5 , COD, total suspended solids (TSS), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP). The compatibility of theoretical and empirical distributions was assessed using the Anderson–Darling test. The best-fitted statistical distributions were selected using Akaike criterion. Performed calculations made it possible to state that out of all proposed methods, the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for distribution proved to be the best-fitted. Obtained simulation results proved that the statistical tools used in this paper describe the changes of pollutant indicators correctly. The calculations allowed us to state that the proposed calculation method can be an effective tool for predicting the course of subsequent sewage treatment stages. Modelling results can be used to make a reliable assessment of sewage susceptibility to biodegradability expressed by the BOD 5 /COD, BOD 5 /TN and BOD 5 /TP ratios. New data generated this way can be helpful for the assessment of WWTP operation work and for preparing different possible scenarios for their operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Młyński & Anna Młyńska & Krzysztof Chmielowski & Jan Pawełek, 2020. "Investigation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant Processes Efficiency Using Statistical Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10522-:d:462875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pereira, Edinaldo José da Silva & Pinho, João Tavares & Galhardo, Marcos André Barros & Macêdo, Wilson Negrão, 2014. "Methodology of risk analysis by Monte Carlo Method applied to power generation with renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 347-355.
    2. Glickman, Theodore S. & Xu, Feng, 2008. "The distribution of the product of two triangular random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2821-2826, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhowmik, Chiranjib & Bhowmik, Sumit & Ray, Amitava & Pandey, Krishna Murari, 2017. "Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 796-813.
    2. Balibrea-Iniesta, José & Rodríguez-Monroy, Carlos & Núñez-Guerrero, Yilsy María, 2021. "Economic analysis of the German regulation for electrical generation projects from biogas applying the theory of real options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Valer, L. Roberto & Manito, Alex. R.A. & Ribeiro, Tina B. Selles & Zilles, Roberto & Pinho, João T., 2017. "Issues in PV systems applied to rural electrification in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1033-1043.
    4. Xu Lei & Tang Shiyun & Deng Yanfei & Yuan Yuan, 2020. "Sustainable operation-oriented investment risk evaluation and optimization for renewable energy project: a case study of wind power in China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 223-241, July.
    5. Selim Gündüz & Ali Genç, 2015. "The distribution of the quotient of two triangularly distributed random variables," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 291-310, May.
    6. Anuja Shaktawat & Shelly Vadhera, 2021. "Risk management of hydropower projects for sustainable development: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 45-76, January.
    7. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2017. "Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 602-615.
    8. Denys Pommeret & Laurence Reboul, 2019. "Approximating the Probability Density Function of a Transformation of Random Variables," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 633-645, June.
    9. Kayser, Dirk, 2016. "Solar photovoltaic projects in China: High investment risks and the need for institutional response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 144-152.
    10. Morgan Bazilian & Debabrata Chattopadhyay, 2015. "Considering Power System Planning in Fragile and Conflict States," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1530, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Zografidou, Eleni & Petridis, Konstantinos & Petridis, Nikolaos E. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos, 2017. "A financial approach to renewable energy production in Greece using goal programming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 37-51.
    12. Martina Toulová & Marcela Tuzová & Jakub Straka, 2016. "The Aspects of Managing Risks in Connection with the Internationalization of Smes from Selected Central European Countries," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(5), pages 1775-1784.
    13. Schiochet Pinto, Luane & Pinheiro Neto, Daywes & de Leles Ferreira Filho, Anésio & Domingues, Elder Geraldo, 2020. "An alternative methodology for analyzing the risk and sensitivity of the economic viability for generating electrical energy with biogas from the anaerobic bio-digestion of vinasse," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1401-1410.
    14. Sommerfeldt, Nelson & Madani, Hatef, 2017. "Revisiting the techno-economic analysis process for building-mounted, grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems: Part one – Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1379-1393.
    15. Elena Fregonara & Diego Giuseppe Ferrando & Sara Pattono, 2018. "Economic–Environmental Sustainability in Building Projects: Introducing Risk and Uncertainty in LCCE and LCCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Michał Gołębiewski & Marta Galant-Gołębiewska, 2021. "Economic Model and Risk Analysis of Energy Investments Based on Cogeneration Systems and Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Cristóbal-Monreal, Iván R. & Yusta, José M., 2016. "Stochastic-heuristic methodology for the optimisation of components and control variables of PV-wind-diesel-battery stand-alone systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 919-935.
    18. Liu, Huanan & Yu, Dongmin & Wang, Rijun & Alizadeh, As’ad & Nojavan, Sayyad & Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak, 2020. "Risk management of a renewable-based compressed air energy storage system using downside risk constraints approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 470-481.
    19. Lukuyu, June M. & Blanchard, Richard E. & Rowley, Paul N., 2019. "A risk-adjusted techno-economic analysis for renewable-based milk cooling in remote dairy farming communities in East Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 700-713.
    20. Sommerfeldt, Nelson & Madani, Hatef, 2017. "Revisiting the techno-economic analysis process for building-mounted, grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems: Part two - Application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1394-1404.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10522-:d:462875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.