IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10467-d462109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limits of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Malaysia: Dam Politics, Rent-Seeking, and Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Ho

    (Zijingang Campus, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Bin Md Saman Nor-Hisham

    (Department of Town and Regional Planning, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Cawangan Perak 32610, Malaysia)

  • Heng Zhao

    (Zijingang Campus, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is often portrayed as a policy measure that can mitigate the environmental influence of corporate and government projects through objective, systematic, and value-free assessment. Simultaneously, however, research has also shown that the larger political context in which the EIA is embedded is crucial in determining its influence on decision-making. Moreover, particularly in the case of mega-projects, vested economic interests, rent-seeking, and politics may provide them with a momentum in which the EIA risks becoming a mere formality. To substantiate this point, the article examines the EIA of what is reportedly Asia’s largest dam outside China: the Bakun Hydro-electric Project (BHP) in Malaysia. The study is based on mixed methods, particularly, qualitative research (semi-structured interviews, participatory observation, and archival study) coupled to a survey conducted in 10 resource-poor, indigenous communities in the resettlement area. It is found that close to 90% of the respondents are dissatisfied with their participation in the EIA, while another 80% stated that the authorities had conducted the EIA without complying to the procedures. The findings do not only shed light on the manner in which the EIA was used to legitimize a project that should ultimately have been halted, but are also testimony to the way that the BHP has disenfranchised the rights of indigenous people to meaningfully participate in the EIA.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Ho & Bin Md Saman Nor-Hisham & Heng Zhao, 2020. "Limits of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Malaysia: Dam Politics, Rent-Seeking, and Conflict," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10467-:d:462109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada, 2020. "Distributional Bargaining and the Speed of Structural Change in the Petroleum Exporting Labor Surplus Economies," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(1), pages 51-98, January.
    2. Ben Dipper, 1998. "Monitoring and Post-auditing in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 731-747.
    3. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bulan, L.C., 2011. "Behind an ambitious megaproject in Asia: The history and implications of the Bakun hydroelectric dam in Borneo," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 4842-4859, September.
    4. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2018. "A Note on Revenue Distribution Patterns and Rent-Seeking Incentive," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 196-204.
    5. Wen Chiat Lee & K. Kuperan Viswanathan & Jamal Ali, 2015. "Compensation policy in a large development project: the case of the Bakun hydroelectric dam," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 64-72, March.
    6. Joe Weston, 2004. "EIA in a risk society," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 313-325.
    7. Abosede Ijabadeniyi & Frank Vanclay, 2020. "Socially-Tolerated Practices in Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Reporting: Discourses, Displacement, and Impoverishment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2020. "Drivers of CO 2 -Emissions in Fossil Fuel Abundant Settings: (Pooled) Mean Group and Nonparametric Panel Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada, 2021. "Addressing the growth and employment effects of the extractive industries: white and black box illustrations from Kazakhstan," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 402-434, May.
    3. Sadik-Zada, Elkhan Richard & Gatto, Andrea, 2021. "The puzzle of greenhouse gas footprints of oil abundance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Radoslaw Wisniewski & Piotr Daniluk & Tomasz Kownacki & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman, 2022. "Energy System Development Scenarios: Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Niftiyev, Ibrahim, 2022. "Exclusive Linear Modeling Approach to the Natural Resource Curse in the Azerbaijani Economy: Examples of Stepwise Regression," EconStor Preprints 266036, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Andrea Caravaggio & Luigi De Cesare & Andrea Di Liddo, 2023. "A Differential Game for Optimal Water Price Management," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Shirley, Rebekah G. & Word, Jettie, 2018. "Rights, rivers and renewables: Lessons from hydropower conflict in Borneo on the role of cultural politics in energy planning for Small Island Developing States," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 189-199.
    8. Anika Trebbin, 2021. "Land Grabbing and Jatropha in India: An Analysis of ‘Hyped’ Discourse on the Subject," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Marko Lovec & Luka Juvančič, 2021. "The Role of Industrial Revival in Untapping the Bioeconomy’s Potential in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Curran, Franziska & Smart, Simon & Lacey, Justine & Greig, Chris & Lant, Paul, 2018. "Learning from experience in the water sector to improve access to energy services," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 41-50.
    11. Maksim Y. Zadorin & Konstantin S. Zaikov & Nikita M. Kuprikov & Mikhail Y. Kuprikov, 2022. "Legal and Economic Prospects for the Arctic Seaport Developments of the Northern Dimension Partner Countries (Russia and the European Union)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Ho, Lip-Wah, 2016. "Wind energy in Malaysia: Past, present and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 279-295.
    13. Pål Østebø Andersen & Jan Inge Nygård & Aizhan Kengessova, 2022. "Prediction of Oil Recovery Factor in Stratified Reservoirs after Immiscible Water-Alternating Gas Injection Based on PSO-, GSA-, GWO-, and GA-LSSVM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-35, January.
    14. Preetha K. V. & Ajit Menon, 2019. "Neo-Liberalising Energy Production: The Making and Unmaking of an Ultra Mega Power Project in South India," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 24(2), pages 242-258, December.
    15. Awojobi, Omotola & Jenkins, Glenn P., 2015. "Were the hydro dams financed by the World Bank from 1976 to 2005 worthwhile?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 222-232.
    16. Peter Ho & Bin Md Saman Nor-Hisham & Heng Zhao, 2024. "Credibility and the Social Function of Property: A Saga of Mega-Dams, Eviction, and Privatization, as Told by Displaced Communities in Malaysia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Tamm, Ottar & Tamm, Toomas, 2020. "Verification of a robust method for sizing and siting the small hydropower run-of-river plant potential by using GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 153-159.
    18. A. Suresh & P. Krishnan & Girish K. Jha & A. Amarender Reddy, 2022. "Agricultural Sustainability and Its Trends in India: A Macro-Level Index-Based Empirical Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Andrea Schapper & Frauke Urban, 2021. "Large dams, norms and Indigenous Peoples," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(S1), pages 61-80, August.
    20. Rui Sun & Dayi He & Jingjing Yan & Li Tao, 2021. "Mechanism Analysis of Applying Blockchain Technology to Forestry Carbon Sink Projects Based on the Differential Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10467-:d:462109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.