IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10442-d461672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mycological Indicators in Evaluating Conservation Status: The Case of Quercus spp. Dehesas in the Middle-West of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain)

Author

Listed:
  • Prudencio García Jiménez

    (Spanish-Portuguese Agricultural Research Centre (CIALE), Universidad de Salamanca, Río Duero 12, 37185 Villamayor, Spain)

  • Abel Fernández Ruiz

    (Spanish-Portuguese Agricultural Research Centre (CIALE), Universidad de Salamanca, Río Duero 12, 37185 Villamayor, Spain)

  • José Sánchez Sánchez

    (Spanish-Portuguese Agricultural Research Centre (CIALE), Universidad de Salamanca, Río Duero 12, 37185 Villamayor, Spain
    Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Universidad de Salamanca, Licenciado Méndez Nieto s/n, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • David Rodríguez de la Cruz

    (Spanish-Portuguese Agricultural Research Centre (CIALE), Universidad de Salamanca, Río Duero 12, 37185 Villamayor, Spain
    Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Universidad de Salamanca, Licenciado Méndez Nieto s/n, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

The use of bioindicators to assess the conservation status of various ecosystems is becoming increasingly common, although fungi have not been widely used for this purpose. The aim was to use the analysis of the macromycetes fruiting bodies in the area of a natural reserve and the degree of preservation of its different zones combined with the use of geographical information systems (GIS). For this purpose, quantitative and qualitative fungal samples were carried out in plots of the middle-west of the Iberian Peninsula previously delimited and characterised thanks to GIS during the springs and autumns of the 2009–2012 period. In addition, the lifestyles of the fungal species were analysed as well as the influence of the main meteorological parameters on fungal fruiting. A total of 10,125 fruiting bodies belonging to 148 species were counted on 20 plots with four vegetation units (holm oak dehesas, mixed holm oaks and Pyrenean oak dehesas with different abundance and grasslands). The distribution of the different species, their lifestyles and the number of fruiting bodies in the different plots of the reserve indicated that the eastern part was best conserved, showing that the combination of fungal diversity studies and the use of GIS could be useful in the management of areas with environmental relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Prudencio García Jiménez & Abel Fernández Ruiz & José Sánchez Sánchez & David Rodríguez de la Cruz, 2020. "Mycological Indicators in Evaluating Conservation Status: The Case of Quercus spp. Dehesas in the Middle-West of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10442-:d:461672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molina, Juan Ramón & Silva, Francisco Rodríguez y & Herrera, Miguel Ángel, 2016. "Integrating economic landscape valuation into Mediterranean territorial planning," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 120-128.
    2. Ji-Hyun Park & Igor N. Pavlov & Min-Ji Kim & Myung Soo Park & Seung-Yoon Oh & Ki Hyeong Park & Jonathan J. Fong & Young Woon Lim, 2020. "Investigating Wood Decaying Fungi Diversity in Central Siberia, Russia Using ITS Sequence Analysis and Interaction with Host Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Manoela Sacchis Lopes & Bijeesh Kozhikkodan Veettil & Dejanira Luderitz Saldanha, 2019. "Assessment of Small-Scale Ecosystem Conservation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: A Study from Rio Canoas State Park, Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasija Novikova & Lucia Rocchi & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2019. "Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Elena Cervelli & Stefania Pindozzi & Emilia Allevato & Luigi Saulino & Roberto Silvestro & Ester Scotto di Perta & Antonio Saracino, 2022. "Landscape Planning Integrated Approaches to Support Post-Wildfire Restoration in Natural Protected Areas: The Vesuvius National Park Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Halkos, George E & Aslanidis, Panagiotis-Stavros & Landis, Conrad & Papadaki, Lydia & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2024. "A review on primary and cascading hazards by exploring individuals’ willingness-to-pay for urban sustainability policies," MPRA Paper 122262, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Hassan, Suziana & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2019. "Urban-rural divides in preferences for wetland conservation in Malaysia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 226-237.
    5. Rodobaldo Martinez-Vivar & Alexander Sanchez-Rodriguez & Reyner Perez-Campdesuner & Gelmar Garcia-Vidal, 2021. "Structural equations to analyze entrepreneur satisfaction as indicator of human resources management at the territorial level," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 132-140, September.
    6. Brunetta, Grazia & Monaco, Roberto & Salizzoni, Emma & Salvarani, Francesco, 2018. "Integrating landscape in regional development: A multidisciplinary approach to evaluation in Trentino planning policies, Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 613-626.
    7. Solecka, Iga & Raszka, Beata & Krajewski, Piotr, 2018. "Landscape analysis for sustainable land use policy: A case study in the municipality of Popielów, Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 116-126.
    8. Francesco Riccioli & Roberto Fratini & Claudio Fagarazzi & Mario Cozzi & Mauro Viccaro & Severino Romano & Duccio Rocchini & Salomon Espinosa Diaz & Clara Tattoni, 2020. "Mapping the Recreational Value of Coppices’ Management Systems in Tuscany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Becker, Nir & Kimhi, Ayal & Argaman, Eli, 2020. "Costs and benefits of waste soils removal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Kota Mameno & Takahiro Kubo & Hiroyuki Oguma & Yukihiro Amagai & Yasushi Shoji, 2022. "Decline in the alpine landscape aesthetic value in a national park under climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Lijun Mao & Mingshi Li & Wenjuan Shen, 2020. "Remote Sensing Applications for Monitoring Terrestrial Protected Areas: Progress in the Last Decade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Manoela Sacchis Lopes & Dejanira Lüderitz Saldanha & Bijeesh Kozhikkodan Veettil, 2021. "Object-oriented and fuzzy logic classification methods for mapping reforested areas with exotic species in Rio Canoas State Park—Santa Catarina, Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7791-7807, May.
    13. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2022. "Economic Valuation of Landscape in Marinas: Application to a Marina in Spanish Southern Mediterranean Coast (Granada, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10442-:d:461672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.