IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10417-d461213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BIM for Healthy Buildings: An Integrated Approach of Architectural Design based on IAQ Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro D’Amico

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Giacomo Bergonzoni

    (Department of Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40141 Bologna, Italy)

  • Agnese Pini

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Edoardo Currà

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The relationship between users and the built environment represents a fundamental aspect of health. The factors that define the properties linked to health and well-being are increasingly becoming part of building design. In these terms, building information modelling (BIM) and BIM-based performance simulation take on a priority role. Among the key features for the design of Healthy Buildings, indoor air quality (IAQ) plays a central role. There are numerous indoor pollutants with significant health effects; volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are to be mentioned among these. The paper presents the proposal of an integrated workflow in the BIM process for the check and control of VOC emissions from building materials and their concentration in confined environments. The workflow is developed through the systematisation of IAQ parameters for the open BIM standard, the integration in the BIM process of a numerical model for the prediction of the VOCs concentration in the indoor environment, and the development of model checkers for performance verification. The results show a good adhesion between the numerical model and the implementation in BIM, providing the designer with a rapid control instrument of IAQ in the various phases of the building design. The present study is the first development focused on TVOC, but implementable concerning other aspects of IAQ, as needed for the effectiveness of performance building-based design for health and wellness issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro D’Amico & Giacomo Bergonzoni & Agnese Pini & Edoardo Currà, 2020. "BIM for Healthy Buildings: An Integrated Approach of Architectural Design based on IAQ Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-31, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10417-:d:461213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Breslow, L., 2006. "Health measurement in the third era of health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(1), pages 17-19.
    2. Sungwoo Lee & Sungho Tae & Seungjun Roh & Taehyung Kim, 2015. "Green Template for Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings Based on Building Information Modeling: Focus on Embodied Environmental Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Marzouk & Rana Ayman & Zaid Alwan & Nehal Elshaboury, 2022. "Green building system integration into project delivery utilising BIM," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6467-6480, May.
    2. Zhen Liu & Zulan Yang & Mohamed Osmani, 2021. "The Relationship between Sustainable Built Environment, Art Therapy and Therapeutic Design in Promoting Health and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Cayetano Medina-Molina & María de la Sierra Rey-Tienda & Eva María Suárez-Redondo, 2022. "The Transition of Cities towards Innovations in Mobility: Searching for a Global Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Alessandro D’Amico & Agnese Pini & Simone Zazzini & Daniela D’Alessandro & Giovanni Leuzzi & Edoardo Currà, 2020. "Modelling VOC Emissions from Building Materials for Healthy Building Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Peter Mésároš & Marcela Spišáková & Tomáš Mandičák & Jozef Čabala & Milan M. Oravec, 2021. "Adaptive Design of Formworks for Building Renovation Considering the Sustainability of Construction in BIM Environment—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Zhen Liu & Zulan Yang & Mingjie Liang & Yi Liu & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework for Blockchain Enhanced Information Modeling for Healing and Therapeutic Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Jrade & Farnaz Jalaei & Jieying Jane Zhang & Saeed Jalilzadeh Eirdmousa & Farzad Jalaei, 2023. "Potential Integration of Bridge Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment/Life Cycle Costing Tools for Infrastructure Projects within Construction 4.0: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Kai Xue & Md. Uzzal Hossain & Meng Liu & Mingjun Ma & Yizhi Zhang & Mengqiang Hu & XiaoYi Chen & Guangyu Cao, 2021. "BIM Integrated LCA for Promoting Circular Economy towards Sustainable Construction: An Analytical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Jozef Mitterpach & Emília Hroncová & Juraj Ladomerský & Jozef Štefko, 2016. "Quantification of Improvement in Environmental Quality for Old Residential Buildings Using Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Anita Naneva & Marcella Bonanomi & Alexander Hollberg & Guillaume Habert & Daniel Hall, 2020. "Integrated BIM-Based LCA for the Entire Building Process Using an Existing Structure for Cost Estimation in the Swiss Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Min Ho Shin & Hye Kyung Lee & Hwan Yong Kim, 2018. "Benefit–Cost Analysis of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in a Railway Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Clyde Zhengdao Li & Yiqian Deng & Yingyi Ya & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Chen Lu, 2023. "Applications of Information Technology in Building Carbon Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Bliss Cavanagh & Kirsti Haracz & Miranda Lawry & Carole James, 2020. "Receptive Arts Engagement for Health: A Holistic and Trans-Disciplinary Approach to Creating a Multisensory Environment," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    8. Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Fulvio Re Cecconi & Sebastiano Maltese & Stefano Rinaldi & Angelo Luigi Camillo Ciribini & Alessandra Flammini, 2021. "Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Chin-Wen Liao & Jen-Hui Lin & Tzu-Wen Chen, 2022. "Research on a Framework for Sustainable Campus Eco-Architecture Selection: Taking a Taiwan High School as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Seungjun Roh & Sungho Tae & Rakhyun Kim & Suroh Park, 2019. "Probabilistic Analysis of Major Construction Materials in the Life Cycle Embodied Environmental Cost of Korean Apartment Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Guofeng Ma & Ying Liu & Shanshan Shang, 2019. "A Building Information Model (BIM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Based System for Personal Thermal Comfort Evaluation and Energy Efficient Design of Interior Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Tajda Potrč Obrecht & Martin Röck & Endrit Hoxha & Alexander Passer, 2020. "BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Tiziano Dalla Mora & Erika Bolzonello & Carmine Cavalliere & Fabio Peron, 2020. "Key Parameters Featuring BIM-LCA Integration in Buildings: A Practical Review of the Current Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-33, September.
    15. Sara Giaveno & Anna Osello & Davide Garufi & Diego Santamaria Razo, 2021. "Embodied Carbon and Embodied Energy Scenarios in the Built Environment. Computational Design Meets EPDs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Admassu N. Lamu & Jan Abel Olsen, 2018. "Yes, health is important, but as much for its importance via social life: The direct and indirect effects of health on subjective well‐being in chronically ill individuals," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 209-222, January.
    17. Zager Kocjan, Gaja & Avsec, Andreja & Kavčič, Tina, 2024. "Feeling too low to be active: Physical inactivity mediates the relationship between mental and physical health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    18. Lewis Husain & Gerald Bloom & Yue Xiao, 2023. "Building policy capacity for managing rapid, complex change in China’s health system," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 28-48.
    19. Tara M Powell & Oe Jin Shin & Shang-Ju Li & Yuan Hsiao, 2020. "Post-traumatic stress, social, and physical health: A mediation and moderation analysis of Syrian refugees and Jordanians in a border community," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Ivan Merino & Israel Herrera & Hugo Valdés, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of Energy Scenarios for a Low-Carbon Electrical Network in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10417-:d:461213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.