IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9138-d439409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence Approach for Tomato Detection and Mass Estimation in Precision Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Jaesu Lee

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Haseeb Nazki

    (Department of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AJ, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jeonghyun Baek

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Korea)

  • Youngsin Hong

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Korea)

  • Meonghun Lee

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Korea)

Abstract

Application of computer vision and robotics in agriculture requires sufficient knowledge and understanding of the physical properties of the object of interest. Yield monitoring is an example where these properties affect the quantified estimation of yield mass. In this study, we propose an image-processing and artificial intelligence-based system using multi-class detection with instance-wise segmentation of fruits in an image that can further estimate dimensions and mass. We analyze a tomato image dataset with mass and dimension values collected using a calibrated vision system and accurate measuring devices. After successful detection and instance-wise segmentation, we extract the real-world dimensions of the fruit. Our characterization results exhibited a significantly high correlation between dimensions and mass, indicating that artificial intelligence algorithms can effectively capture this complex physical relation to estimate the final mass. We also compare different artificial intelligence algorithms to show that the computed mass agrees well with the actual mass. Detection and segmentation results show an average mask intersection over union of 96.05%, mean average precision of 92.28%, detection accuracy of 99.02%, and precision of 99.7%. The mean absolute percentage error for mass estimation was 7.09 for 77 test samples using a bagged ensemble tree regressor. This approach could be applied to other computer vision and robotic applications such as sizing and packaging systems and automated harvesting or to other measuring instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaesu Lee & Haseeb Nazki & Jeonghyun Baek & Youngsin Hong & Meonghun Lee, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Approach for Tomato Detection and Mass Estimation in Precision Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9138-:d:439409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junmin Jia & Fei Hu & Xubo Zhang & Zongyou Ben & Yifan Wang & Kunjie Chen, 2023. "Method of Attention-Based CNN for Weighing Pleurotus eryngii," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Xiang Yue & Kai Qi & Xinyi Na & Yang Zhang & Yanhua Liu & Cuihong Liu, 2023. "Improved YOLOv8-Seg Network for Instance Segmentation of Healthy and Diseased Tomato Plants in the Growth Stage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Stępień Sebastian & Smędzik-Ambroży Katarzyna & Polcyn Jan & Kwiliński Aleksy & Maican Ionut, 2023. "Are small farms sustainable and technologically smart? Evidence from Poland, Romania, and Lithuania," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 10(57), pages 116-132, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9138-:d:439409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.