IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9088-d438396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust in Courier Services and Its Antecedents as a Determinant of Perceived Service Quality and Future Intention to Use Courier Service

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Ejdys

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Gulc

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Service quality perceived by clients should be a crucial element in the process of co-creating sustainable services. This article aimed to examine relationships between five constructs: the usefulness of courier services, the ease of use of courier services, the trust in courier services, the service quality, and the future intention to use courier services. This research focuses on courier services. An electronic questionnaire was used to conduct confidential interviews. It was distributed between January and March 2019. The number of questionnaires returned by courier service customers amounted to 1073. The authors used generalized least squares (GLS) of structural equation modelling (GLS-SEM) to verify the hypotheses. The obtained results confirmed statistically significant relationships between the variables of the ease of use and the trust in service, the usefulness and the trust in service, the trust in service and the service quality and finally, the service quality and the future intention to use the services. The obtained results confirmed an important role of technological aspects in courier service quality, which will become the main determinant of the development of this sector in the future. The authors proposed a new approach to the definition of trust in service. Apart from the interpersonal trust, they shed more light on the trust in the supplier, i.e., the trust in the used technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Ejdys & Aleksandra Gulc, 2020. "Trust in Courier Services and Its Antecedents as a Determinant of Perceived Service Quality and Future Intention to Use Courier Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9088-:d:438396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alzahrani, Latifa & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2017. "Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 164-175.
    2. Daeheon Choi & Chune Young Chung & Jason Young, 2019. "Sustainable Online Shopping Logistics for Customer Satisfaction and Repeat Purchasing Behavior: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Ibn Kailan Abdul-Hamid & Aijaz A. Shaikh & Henry Boateng & Robert E. Hinson, 2019. "Customers' Perceived Risk and Trust in Using Mobile Money Services—an Empirical Study of Ghana," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Wicks, Andrew C. & Berman, Shawn L., 2004. "The Effects of Context on Trust in Firm-Stakeholder Relationships: The Institutional Environment, Trust Creation, and Firm Performance," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 141-160, January.
    5. Fernanda Leão Ramos & Jorge Brantes Ferreira & Angilberto Sabino de Freitas & Juliana Werneck Rodrigues, 2018. "The Effect of Trust in the Intention to Use m-banking," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(2), pages 175-191, March.
    6. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Giedrius Romeika & Raimonda Kauliene & Justas Streimikis & Rimantas Dapkus, 2020. "ES-QUAL model and customer satisfaction in online banking: evidence from multivariate analysis techniques," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(1), pages 59-93, March.
    7. Danuta Szpilko, 2020. "Foresight as a Tool for the Planning and Implementation of Visions for Smart City Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    8. James Agyei & Shaorong Sun & Eugene Abrokwah & Emmanuel Kofi Penney & Richmond Ofori-Boafo, 2020. "Influence of Trust on Customer Engagement: Empirical Evidence From the Insurance Industry in Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    9. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 100-110.
    10. Dale E. Zand, 2016. "Reflections on trust and trust research: then and now," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 63-73, April.
    11. Park, Jongchul & Lee, Hanjoon & Kim, Chankon, 2014. "Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 295-302.
    12. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    13. HakJun Song & Wenjia Ruan & Yunmi Park, 2019. "Effects of Service Quality, Corporate Image, and Customer Trust on the Corporate Reputation of Airlines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.
    14. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    15. Johnson, Devon & Grayson, Kent, 2005. "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 500-507, April.
    16. Lemuria Carter & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2008. "E-government adoption: A cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 473-482, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongtao Peng & Bohai Chen & Eleonora Veglianti, 2022. "Platform Service Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Data Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Vijoleta Vrhovac & Stana Vasić & Stevan Milisavljević & Branislav Dudić & Peter Štarchoň & Marina Žižakov, 2023. "Measuring E-Commerce User Experience in the Last-Mile Delivery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Sayan, Zafer & Sürücü, Lütfi, 2024. "The role of transformational leadership and employee productivity in logistics performance," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    2. Wenjuan Li & Lan Xue, 2021. "Analyzing the Critical Factors Influencing Post-Use Trust and Its Impact on Citizens’ Continuous-Use Intention of E-Government: Evidence from Chinese Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Grüner, Alina & Postel, Lea & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Sharing is caring? The effect of negative peer-to-peer experiences on loyalty intentions in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2723 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sharma, Kavita & Licsandru, Tana Cristina & Gupta, Suraksha & Aggarwal, Swati & Kanungo, Rama, 2020. "An investigation into corporate trust and its linkages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 806-824.
    6. Jalan, Akanksha & Matkovskyy, Roman & Urquhart, Andrew & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2023. "The role of interpersonal trust in cryptocurrency adoption," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Dodik Ariyanto & Ayu Aryista Dewi & Henny Triyana Hasibuan & Rizky Bagus Paramadani, 2022. "The Success of Information Systems and Sustainable Information Society: Measuring the Implementation of a Village Financial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Pynnönen, Sari & Haltia, Emmi & Hujala, Teppo, 2021. "Digital forest information platform as service innovation: Finnish Metsaan.fi service use, users and utilisation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Yan chao Shi & Un-Kon Lee, 2021. "The Impact of Restaurant Recommendation Information and Recommendation Agent in the Tourism Website on the Satisfaction, Continuous Usage, and Destination Visit Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    10. Sharma, Sujeet Kumar & Sharma, Manisha, 2019. "Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 65-75.
    11. Xusen Cheng & Fei Guo & Jin Chen & Kejiang Li & Yihui Zhang & Peng Gao, 2019. "Exploring the Trust Influencing Mechanism of Robo-Advisor Service: A Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Nguyen, Phi Dung & Huynh, Cong Minh, 2023. "Sustainable E-commerce Logistics for Customer Satisfaction: Evidence from Vietnam," MPRA Paper 115976, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    14. Lian, Jiunn-Woei, 2015. "Critical factors for cloud based e-invoice service adoption in Taiwan: An empirical study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 98-109.
    15. Kim, Heetae & Park, Eunil & Kwon, Sang Jib & Ohm, Jay Y. & Chang, Hyun Joon, 2014. "An integrated adoption model of solar energy technologies in South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 523-531.
    16. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara & Merli, Dominik, 2024. "Gamification in workforce training: Improving employees’ self-efficacy and information security and data protection behaviours," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Umair Akram & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel Căpușneanu, 2021. "Impact of Digitalization on Customers’ Well-Being in the Pandemic Period: Challenges and Opportunities for the Retail Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.
    19. Hyun-Sun Ryu & Kwang Sun Ko, 2020. "Sustainable Development of Fintech: Focused on Uncertainty and Perceived Quality Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Eva Chen & Ilka Weber, 2010. "To Discount or Not to Discount: An Assessment of Perceptions, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Electronic Auctions with Discounts," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 127-148, March.
    21. Nguyen, Stephanie & Didi Alaoui, Mohamed & Llosa, Sylvie, 2020. "When interchangeability between providers and users makes a difference: The mediating role of social proximity in collaborative services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 506-515.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9088-:d:438396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.