IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p8916-d435416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational Decisions and Sustainability: A Brazilian Case of a Drugs Distribution Center

Author

Listed:
  • João Thiago de G. A. A. Campos

    (Escola Politécnica - Dpto. de Engenharia Mecânica, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil
    Current address: Aristidis Novis, 2—Federação, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Renato de Castro Vivas

    (Escola Politécnica - Dpto. de Engenharia Mecânica, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil
    Current address: Aristidis Novis, 2—Federação, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Adonias Magdiel Silva Ferreira

    (Escola Politécnica - Dpto. de Engenharia Mecânica, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil
    Current address: Aristidis Novis, 2—Federação, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires

    (Escola Politécnica - Dpto. de Engenharia Mecânica, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil
    Current address: Aristidis Novis, 2—Federação, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Recently, the supply chain in the pharmaceutical sector, which is important economically to the healthcare industry worldwide, has received special attention owing to different factors involved in the distribution of drugs. Furthermore, it has an important role in global sustainability as organizations base their efficient decisions on the results from performance analysis of economic indicators. Thus, the sustainability of operations decisions must be analyzed to achieve better decision efficiency. This study integrates analytical methods of operational activities evaluation for a drug distribution center in a pharmaceutical logistic organization to analyze the sustainability of its operations. Furthermore, a proposed framework incorporates time variability management (TVM) decisions into a trade-off analysis of triple bottom-line (TBL) sustainability dimensions and operations managers’ decisions. The framework is a real-time data-gathering decision system that evaluates processes using stochastic simulation and process efficacity based on control-chart analysis and analyzes the trade-off performance. Managers’ decisions on time variability is modeled using an Analytical Hierarchy Process. The results of the trade-off analysis of sustainability and TVM indicate that economic dimensions have a higher impact on an organization than social and environmental dimensions. Managers assume that social and environmental impacts are less important to organizations’ performance. Environmental and social dimensions have different impacts on time variability decisions, where managers assume that operations’ time reduction has more impact on the social dimension, while operations’ time increase has a higher environmental impact. Thus, the framework is an effective tool for analyzing the sustainability of operations decisions, which is associated with variability analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • João Thiago de G. A. A. Campos & Renato de Castro Vivas & Adonias Magdiel Silva Ferreira & Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires, 2020. "Operational Decisions and Sustainability: A Brazilian Case of a Drugs Distribution Center," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8916-:d:435416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acquaye, Adolf & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Genovese, Andrea & Afrifa, Godfred A & Yamoah, Fred A & Oppon, Eunice, 2018. "A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 188-205.
    2. Kannan, Vijay R. & Tan, Keah Choon, 2005. "Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 153-162, April.
    3. Prajogo, Daniel & Toy, Jordan & Bhattacharya, Ananya & Oke, Adegoke & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 95-103.
    4. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Violeta Sima & Elvira Nica & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe, 2017. "Measuring Sustainable Competitiveness in Contemporary Economies—Insights from European Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    6. Marco Bertoni, 2017. "Introducing Sustainability in Value Models to Support Design Decision Making: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Zahiri, Behzad & Zhuang, Jun & Mohammadi, Mehrdad, 2017. "Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: A pharmaceutical case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 109-142.
    8. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    9. Bjorn De Koeijer & Jos De Lange & Renee Wever, 2017. "Desired, Perceived, and Achieved Sustainability: Trade-Offs in Strategic and Operational Packaging Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    10. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    11. Aghezzaf, E.H. & Jamali, M.A. & Ait-Kadi, D., 2007. "An integrated production and preventive maintenance planning model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 679-685, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Varsei, Mohsen & Polyakovskiy, Sergey, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain network design: A case of the wine industry in Australia," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 236-247.
    2. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    3. Sovan Mitra & Andreas Karathanasopoulos, 2019. "Firm Value and the Impact of Operational Management," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(1), pages 61-85, March.
    4. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed & Moustafa Zino, 2023. "Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model in selecting pandemic hospital site," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Reddy, K. Nageswara & Kumar, Akhilesh & Choudhary, Alok & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2022. "Multi-period green reverse logistics network design: An improved Benders-decomposition-based heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 735-752.
    6. Schöll, Michaela, 2017. "Three Essays on Sustainable Supply Chain Management – Towards Sustainable Supplier Selection and Sustainable Sourcing," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 172463, September.
    7. Ahi, Payman & Searcy, Cory & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2018. "A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 336-346.
    8. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    9. Sara Al-Haidous & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2019. "Sustainable Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chain Management: A Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Wang, H. & Pan, Chen & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, P., 2020. "Assessing sustainability performance of global supply chains: An input-output modeling approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 393-404.
    11. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 129-148.
    12. Govindan, Kannan & Gholizadeh, Hadi, 2021. "Robust network design for sustainable-resilient reverse logistics network using big data: A case study of end-of-life vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    14. Saberi, Sara, 2018. "Sustainable, multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carrier through reduction in pollution stock," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 421-444.
    15. Çağlar Kıvanç Kaymaz & Salih Birinci & Yusuf Kızılkan, 2022. "Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2986-3012, March.
    16. Ronaldo Brito da Silva & Claudia Aparecida de Mattos, 2019. "Critical Success Factors of a Drug Traceability System for Creating Value in a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain (PSC)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Rocio de la Torre & Canan G. Corlu & Javier Faulin & Bhakti S. Onggo & Angel A. Juan, 2021. "Simulation, Optimization, and Machine Learning in Sustainable Transportation Systems: Models and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    19. Dana Kiseľáková & Beáta Šofranková & Veronika Čabinová & Erika Onuferová, 2018. "Competitiveness and sustainable growth analysis of the EU countries with the use of Global Indexes' methodology," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 581-599, March.
    20. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8916-:d:435416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.