IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8631-d430839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of COVID-19 in University Tutoring Models

Author

Listed:
  • David Pérez-Jorge

    (Department of Didactic and Educational Research, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

  • María del Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez

    (Department of Didactic and Educational Research, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

  • Eva Ariño-Mateo

    (Department of Psychology, LIGS University, 17000 Praha, Czechia)

  • Fernando Barragán-Medero

    (Department of Didactic and Educational Research, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

Abstract

This research is part of the Educational Research Project developed at the University of La Laguna during the academic year 2019–2020, which included the period of confinement by COVID-19. The study was carried out with a sample of 193 student teachers in Early Childhood Education, Primary and four master’s degree programs offered by the Faculty of Education of the University of La Laguna. Four tutoring models were analyzed; in person, by e-mail, using virtual tutoring (Hangout/Google Meet) and WhatsApp. The results confirm the need to enhance synchronous models, as the most effective models for the development of the process of academic orientation and support for students, compared to asynchronous models. These delay the processes of academic decision-making and have a significant effect on them, as well as the pace of study and the motivation of the students, hindering the processes of learning, adaptation and fulfilment.

Suggested Citation

  • David Pérez-Jorge & María del Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez & Eva Ariño-Mateo & Fernando Barragán-Medero, 2020. "The Effect of COVID-19 in University Tutoring Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8631-:d:430839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rung‐Fen Feng & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2012. "Socialisation of new graduate nurses to practising nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 2064-2071, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea McCloughen & David Levy & Anya Johnson & Helena Nguyen & Heather McKenzie, 2020. "Nursing students’ socialisation to emotion management during early clinical placement experiences: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2508-2520, July.
    2. Min Zhang & Li Ge & Mikael Rask, 2019. "Cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Verbal and Social Interaction Questionnaire: A cross‐sectional study among nursing students in China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2181-2196, June.
    3. Kim Usher & Jane Mills & Caryn West & Tanya Park & Cindy Woods, 2015. "Preregistration student nurses' self‐reported preparedness for practice before and after the introduction of a capstone subject," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3245-3254, November.
    4. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær, 2021. "Newly graduated nurses’ socialisation resulting in limiting inquiry and one‐sided use of knowledge sources—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 701-711, March.
    5. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Mette Grønkjær & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in clinical decision‐making: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1313-1327, May.
    6. Hafidza Baharum & Aniza Ismail & Zainudin Awang & Lisa McKenna & Roszita Ibrahim & Zainah Mohamed & Nor Haty Hassan, 2023. "Validating an Instrument for Measuring Newly Graduated Nurses’ Adaptation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Mohit Yadav & Santosh Rangnekar, 2016. "Role Clarity and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Does Tenure Matter? A Study on Indian Power Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 207-224, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8631-:d:430839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.