IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i1p390-d304929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of Land Cover and Ecosystem Services in the Frame of Pastoral Functional Categories: A Case Study in Swedish Lapland

Author

Listed:
  • Romain Courault

    (UFR de Géographie et d’Aménagement, Faculté des Lettres, Institut de Géographie, Sorbonne-Université FRE Espaces, Nature, Culture, 75005 Paris, France
    GDR 2012 AREES Arctique Enjeux Environm & Soc, CNRS-Meudon, 92195 Meudon, France)

  • Marianne Cohen

    (UFR de Géographie et d’Aménagement, Faculté des Lettres, Institut de Géographie, Sorbonne-Université FRE Espaces, Nature, Culture, 75005 Paris, France)

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) are a key-component for sustainable management of human–environment systems, particularly in polar environments where effects of global changes are stronger. Taking local knowledge into account allows the valuation of ES experienced by stakeholders. It is the case for reindeer herders in Scandinavia, the ungulate being a keystone specie for subarctic socio-ecosystems. We adapt the ecosystem services assessment (ESA) proposed in Finland to the case study of the Gabna herders’ community (Sweden), considering its cultural, geographical, and dynamic specificities. We used Saami ecological categories over the land-use categories of the CORINE Land Cover (CLC). We reassessed ES at the scale of the Gabna community and its seasonal pastures. We studied their evolution over 2000–2018, using CLC maps and Change CLC maps. Integration of Saami ecological categories in the classification of land cover did not substantially change the land cover distributions. However, ES were greater in Saami land use compared to other CLC categories. Cultural services were higher for summer and interseasonal pastures, dedicated to the reindeer reproduction, suggesting interactions between provisioning and cultural ES. Land cover changes are mostly represented by intensive forestry (5% of winter pastures) impeding reindeer grazing activity, while other seasonal pasture landscape composition stayed comparable along time. Consequently, forest activity, and in a lesser extent glacier melting and urbanization are the main drivers of the temporal evolution of ES. In the frame of pastoral landscapes conservation, the use of local terminologies opens perspectives for a holistic approach in environmental science. It raises the importance of local stakeholders as co-researchers in nature conservation studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Romain Courault & Marianne Cohen, 2020. "Evolution of Land Cover and Ecosystem Services in the Frame of Pastoral Functional Categories: A Case Study in Swedish Lapland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:390-:d:304929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Bogdanova & Konstantin Filant & Ekaterina Sukhova & Maria Zabolotnikova & Praskovia Filant & Dele Raheem & Olga Shaduyko & Sergei Andronov & Andrey Lobanov, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental and Anthropogenic Factors on the Migration of the Rural Arctic Population of Western Siberia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Normyle, Anna & Vardon, Michael & Doran, Bruce, 2023. "Aligning Indigenous values and cultural ecosystem services for ecosystem accounting: A review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Elena Bogdanova & Sergei Andronov & Andrei Soromotin & Gennady Detter & Oleg Sizov & Kamrul Hossain & Dele Raheem & Andrey Lobanov, 2021. "The Impact of Climate Change on the Food (In)security of the Siberian Indigenous Peoples in the Arctic: Environmental and Health Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:390-:d:304929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.