IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p7895-d418438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific Landscape Related to Mapuche Indigenous Peoples and Wallmapu Territory

Author

Listed:
  • Camila Bañales-Seguel

    (Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Región del Biobío, Chile)

  • Wladimir Riquelme Maulén

    (Centro de Desarrollo Local, Campus Villarrica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Villarrica 4930000, Región de La Araucanía, Chile
    Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo Regional y Políticas Públicas, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno 100213, Región de Los Lagos, Chile)

  • Amaya Álvez

    (Departamento de Derecho Público, Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Región del Biobío, Chile)

  • Evelyn Habit

    (Departamento de Sistemas Acuáticos, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Región del Biobío, Chile)

Abstract

Recent international recognition of indigenous peoples, their rights and contributions to solving current challenges has directed academic attention to the way research is conducted in relation to them, what topics are studied, by whom, and using which methodologies. The Mapuche are the most numerous indigenous peoples in South America and have ancestrally inhabited a territory denominated Wallmapu. This study undertook a comprehensive revision and meta-analysis of the scientific literature related to the Mapuche and Wallmapu. Through quantification and visualization of the scientific landscape, the goal was to enhance the understanding of the themes and patterns that have guided research in this field of study. We found 1611 documents in Web of Science and SciELO collections published between 1975 and 2020. Using CiteSpace software, we analyzed the main conceptual hotspots, identified central authors and pivotal works, among other aspects of the scientific knowledge domain. The main research themes found revolve around political and historical aspects of the relationship between Mapuche and the State; ethnobotanical research including plant properties and cultural knowledge transmission; and the indisputable connection between indigenous resistance and environmental depredation. We argue that valuing cultural diversity paves the road for reclaiming indigenous knowledge as a contribution to our understanding of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Camila Bañales-Seguel & Wladimir Riquelme Maulén & Amaya Álvez & Evelyn Habit, 2020. "Scientific Landscape Related to Mapuche Indigenous Peoples and Wallmapu Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7895-:d:418438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7895/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7895/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. -, 2020. "Los pueblos indígenas de América Latina – Abya Yala y la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible: tensiones y desafíos desde una perspectiva territorial," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 45664 edited by Cepal, May.
    2. Leo Egghe, 2006. "Theory and practise of the g-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 69(1), pages 131-152, October.
    3. Matías Guerrero-Gatica & María Isabel Mujica & Matías Barceló & María Fernanda Vio-Garay & Stefan Gelcich & Juan J. Armesto, 2020. "Traditional and Local Knowledge in Chile: Review of Experiences and Insights for Management and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Yahya Sheikhnejad & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "Scientific Landscape of Sustainable Urban and Rural Areas Research: A Systematic Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Chaomei Chen & Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan & Jianhua Hou, 2010. "The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(7), pages 1386-1409, July.
    6. Yiwen Zeng & Sean Maxwell & Rebecca K. Runting & Oscar Venter & James E. M. Watson & L. Roman Carrasco, 2020. "Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 795-798, October.
    7. Arun Agrawal, 1995. "Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 413-439, July.
    8. Henry Small, 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(4), pages 265-269, July.
    9. Laura Serrano & Antonio Sianes & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2019. "Using Bibliometric Methods to Shed Light on the Concept of Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Aram Ziai, 2011. "The Millennium Development Goals: back to the future?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 27-43.
    11. David Carruthers & Patricia Rodriguez, 2009. "Mapuche Protest, Environmental Conflict and Social Movement Linkage in Chile," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 743-760.
    12. Hui Yang & Xuexin Shao & Ming Wu, 2019. "A Review on Ecosystem Health Research: A Visualization Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrej Kastrin & Dimitar Hristovski, 2021. "Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1415-1451, February.
    2. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    3. Pin Li & Guoli Yang & Chuanqi Wang, 2019. "Visual topical analysis of library and information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1753-1791, December.
    4. Yanto Chandra, 2018. "Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    6. Jianhua Hou, 2017. "Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1437-1452, March.
    7. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    8. Honglei Liu & Jiule Song & Guangbin Wang, 2021. "A Scientometric Review of Smart Construction Site in Construction Engineering and Management: Analysis and Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Jiaxing Jiang & Lin Fan, 2022. "Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Language Experience: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    10. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    11. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Maria-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones & Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, 2017. "Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 195-217, October.
    12. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Rongying Zhao & Ju Wang, 2011. "Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 593-612, March.
    14. Chengliang Liu & Qinchang Gui, 2016. "Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 159-184, October.
    15. Michel Zitt, 2015. "Meso-level retrieval: IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2223-2245, March.
    16. John Rigby & Barbara Jones, 2020. "Bringing the doctoral thesis by published papers to the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A quantitative easing? A small study of doctoral thesis submission rules and practice in two disciplines in ," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1387-1409, August.
    17. Taotao Yan & Jianhui Xue & Zhidong Zhou & Yongbo Wu, 2020. "The Trends in Research on the Effects of Biochar on Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Yin, Xicheng & Wang, Hongwei & Wang, Wei & Zhu, Kevin, 2020. "Task recommendation in crowdsourcing systems: A bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Steven J. Simske & John G. Keogh, 2022. "Blockchain technology in the smart city: a bibliometric review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2875-2906, October.
    20. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7895-:d:418438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.