IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7151-d407577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Timber Forest Products in Brazil: A Bibliometric and a State of the Art Review

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago Cardoso Silva

    (Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil)

  • Emmanoella Costa Guaraná Araujo

    (Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil)

  • Tarcila Rosa da Silva Lins

    (Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil)

  • Cibelle Amaral Reis

    (Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil)

  • Carlos Roberto Sanquetta

    (Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil)

  • Márcio Pereira da Rocha

    (Department of Forestry Engineering and Technology, Federal University of Paraná, 80.210-170 Curitiba, Brazil)

Abstract

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are a consolidated source of income and acquisition of inputs from forest environments. Therefore, the objective of this work was to carry out a collection of publications on NTFPs in Brazil, until 2019, available in the Scopus database, presenting a bibliometric review and the state of the art of this theme from the evaluation of these publications, discussing the challenges of Brazilian legislation on NTFPs. After screening the articles of interest, 196 documents were evaluated, in which they were observed institutions and authors, analyzing networks of citations and terms used, areas of forest sciences and sciences that encompass the most explored biomes and the most studied species. The results showed that the concern to research on NTFPs in Brazil began in the 1990s, with an increase in the number of publications over the years. Besides that, the research on NTFPs is multidisciplinary, with emphasis on the areas of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science. For better regulation of the process of exploration and management of NTFPs in Brazil, the need to create specific legislation that takes into account factors such as the phytogeographic domain the explored area, producing species, and the products and co-products obtained was observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago Cardoso Silva & Emmanoella Costa Guaraná Araujo & Tarcila Rosa da Silva Lins & Cibelle Amaral Reis & Carlos Roberto Sanquetta & Márcio Pereira da Rocha, 2020. "Non-Timber Forest Products in Brazil: A Bibliometric and a State of the Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7151-:d:407577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morsello, Carla, 2006. "Company-community non-timber forest product deals in the Brazilian Amazon: A review of opportunities and problems," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 485-494, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Mello, Natália Girão Rodrigues & Gulinck, Hubert & Van den Broeck, Pieter & Parra, Constanza, 2023. "A qualitative analysis of Non-Timber Forest Products activities as a strategy to promote sustainable land use in the Brazilian Cerrado," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zenteno, Mario & Zuidema, Pieter A. & de Jong, Wil & Boot, René G.A., 2013. "Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: New insights from Bolivian forest communities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 12-21.
    2. Carvalho Ribeiro, Sónia M. & Soares Filho, Britaldo & Leles Costa, William & Bachi, Laura & Ribeiro de Oliveira, Amanda & Bilotta, Patricia & Saadi, Allaoua & Lopes, Elaine & O'Riordan, Tim & Lôbo Pen, 2018. "Can multifunctional livelihoods including recreational ecosystem services (RES) and non timber forest products (NTFP) maintain biodiverse forests in the Brazilian Amazon?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 517-526.
    3. Klimas, Christie A. & Cropper, Wendell P. & Kainer, Karen A. & de Oliveira Wadt, Lúcia H., 2012. "Viability of combined timber and non-timber harvests for one species: A Carapa guianensis case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 147-156.
    4. Marco Faravelli & Oliver Kirchkamp & Helmut Rainer, 2010. "Social Welfare versus Inequality Concerns in an Incomplete Contract Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 2933, CESifo.
    5. Brites, Alice Dantas & Morsello, Carla, 2018. "Effects of Economic Dependence and Cooperative Behavior Over Participation in Monitoring the Impacts of Natural Resource Trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 365-372.
    6. Aghane Antunes & Cynthia S. Simmons & Joao Paulo Veiga, 2021. "Non-Timber Forest Products and the Cosmetic Industry: An Econometric Assessment of Contributions to Income in the Brazilian Amazon," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Soares Filho, Britaldo & Carvalho Ribeiro, Sónia M. & Gonçalves, Rivadalve Coelho, 2017. "Is It Possible to Make Rubber Extraction Ecologically and Economically Viable in the Amazon? The Southern Acre and Chico Mendes Reserve Case Study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 186-197.
    8. Marcelo Elias & Lara Bartocci Liboni & Luciana O. Cezarino & Flavio Pinheiro Martins & Márcio Lopes Pimenta & Per Hilletofth & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2022. "Shedding Light on the Brazilian Amazon Biotrade: A Study on Sustainable Development in Native Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7151-:d:407577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.