IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4268-d361782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporation of the Intangibles into the Spanish Start-Ups by Activity Sector and Region. Improving Their Economic Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • María Dolores García-Gallo

    (Departament of Business Organization, University of Seville, 41018 Seville, Spain)

  • Félix Jiménez-Naharro

    (Departament of Financial Economics and Operations Management, University of Seville, 41018 Seville, Spain)

  • Miguel Torres-García

    (Department of Energy Engineering, University of Seville, Camino de los Descubrimientos, s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain)

  • Susan L. Giesecke

    (Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology College of Engineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • José Guadix-Martín

    (School of Engineering, University of Seville, Camino de los Descubrimientos, s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

Nowadays, start-ups, assuming increasing importance, have the possibility to include intangible knowledge as another resource on which they can carry out planning exercises, impact studies, evaluation and monitoring, protection, accumulation and exploitation. The study carried out in this paper allows us to analyze the influence that intangible knowledge has on the financial status of a start-up and, therefore, on its economic sustainability. This enables start-ups to present a good image, become more transparent, have more opportunities, reduce uncertainty, improve sustainability, etc. Moreover, the study presents a descriptive analysis of intangibles according to regions and activity sectors. An analysis of variance was carried out, to see if there is a relationship between the investment in intangible assets and the activity sector and/or regions to which the company belongs. The study concludes that, among all sectors, the differences in the incorporation of intangible assets into financial statements are most recognized in tourism, which may be a key factor for the sustainability of this sector, especially in periods of economic crisis, such as the one Europe and the planet are currently facing.

Suggested Citation

  • María Dolores García-Gallo & Félix Jiménez-Naharro & Miguel Torres-García & Susan L. Giesecke & José Guadix-Martín, 2020. "Incorporation of the Intangibles into the Spanish Start-Ups by Activity Sector and Region. Improving Their Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4268-:d:361782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie‐Josée Ledoux & Denis Cormier, 2013. "Market assessment of intangibles and voluntary disclosure about innovation: the incidence of IFRS," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 286-304, August.
    2. Keryn Chalmers & Greg Clinch & Jayne M. Godfrey, 2008. "Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards: Impact on the Value Relevance of Intangible Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 237-247, September.
    3. Mark Russell, 2017. "Management incentives to recognise intangible assets," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57, pages 211-234, April.
    4. Yongfu Li & Yu Song & Jinxin Wang & Chengwei Li, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Choi, Won W. & Kwon, Sung S. & Lobo, Gerald J., 2000. "Market Valuation of Intangible Assets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 35-45, July.
    6. Manuel Ángel Nogueira & Sara Fernández-López & Nuria Calvo & David Rodeiro-Pazos, 2018. "Firm characteristics, financial variables and types of innovation: influence in Spanish firms' survival," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1/2), pages 57-79.
    7. Olga Ferraro & Stefania Veltri, 2011. "The value relevance of intellectual capital on the firm's market value: an empirical survey on the Italian listed firms," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 66-84.
    8. Oliveira, Lídia & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2010. "Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 241-252.
    9. Tong Liu & Shiyou Qu & Christopher M. Scherpereel, 2020. "The Influence of the Role Positioning of Investment Institutions on the Value of Start-Up Enterprises from the Perspective of Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Jayne Godfrey & Ping-Sheng Koh, 2001. "The Relevance to Firm Valuation of Capitalising Intangible Assets in Total and by Category," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(24), pages 39-48, July.
    11. Ortiz-Villajos, José M. & Sotoca, Sonia, 2018. "Innovation and business survival: A long-term approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1418-1436.
    12. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues, 2018. "Exploratory Research of ISO 14001:2015 Transition among Portuguese Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Adam Ritter & Peter Wells, 2006. "Identifiable intangible asset disclosures, stock prices and future earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(5), pages 843-863, December.
    14. Dahmash, Firas N. & Durand, Robert B. & Watson, John, 2009. "The value relevance and reliability of reported goodwill and identifiable intangible assets," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 120-137.
    15. Cristina Isabel I. Fernandes & Pedro Mota Veiga & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2017. "What Impact Does Innovation and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Have on Competitiveness?," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global, vol. 8(3), pages 56-66, July.
    16. repec:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-06-2016-0053 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:eme:arapps:v:22:y:2014:i:3:p:182-216 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Dolores García-Gallo & Félix Jiménez-Naharro & Miguel Torres-García & José Guadix-Martín & Susan L. Giesecke, 2021. "Sustainability of Spanish Tourism Start-Ups in the Face of an Economic Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Chris Roberts & Joel Reynolds & Mary Jo Dolasinski, 2022. "Meta-Analysis of Tourism Sustainability Research: 2019–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shawn Ho & Baljit K. Sidhu & Fan Yang, 2023. "The response of Australian firms to AASB 138 disallowing the recognition of internally generated identifiable intangibles," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3609-3641, September.
    2. Lorena Mitrione & George Tanewski & Jacqueline Birt, 2014. "The relevance to firm valuation of research and development expenditure in the Australian health-care industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(3), pages 425-452, August.
    3. Baboukardos, Diogenis & Rimmel, Gunnar, 2014. "Goodwill under IFRS: Relevance and disclosures in an unfavorable environment," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17.
    4. d'Arcy, Anne & Tarca, Ann, 2018. "Reviewing IFRS Goodwill Accounting Research: Implementation Effects and Cross-Country Differences," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 203-226.
    5. Dargenidou, Christina & Jackson, Richard H.G. & Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & Tsoligkas, Fanis, 2021. "Capitalisation of R&D and the informativeness of stock prices: Pre- and post-IFRS evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    6. repec:eme:jfrcpp:v:18:y:2010:i:2:p:120-130 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bagna, Emanuel & Ramusino, Enrico Cotta & Ogliari, Matteo, 2023. "The impact of different goodwill accounting methods on stock prices: A comparison of amortization and impairment-only methodologies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Hyunmi Ji, 2020. "Financial Analyses and Corporate Evaluation on Sustainable Ability to Generate Excess Profit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Dong Xiang & Abul Shamsuddin & Andrew C Worthington, 2011. "A comparative technical, cost and profit efficiency analysis of Australian, Canadian and UK banks: Feasible efficiency improvements in the context of controllable and uncontrollable factors," Discussion Papers in Finance finance:201119, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    10. Smith, Julia A. & Cordina, Renzo, 2014. "The role of accounting in high-technology investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 309-322.
    11. Maigoshi, Zaharaddeen Salisu & Latif, Rohaida Abdul & Kamardin, Hasnah, 2018. "Change in value-relevance of disclosed RPT across accounting regimes: Evidence from Malaysia," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 422-433.
    12. Mark Russell, 2017. "Management incentives to recognise intangible assets," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57, pages 211-234, April.
    13. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    14. Wen, He & Moehrle, Stephen R., 2016. "Accounting for goodwill: An academic literature review and analysis to inform the debate," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 11-21.
    15. Dahmash, Firas N. & Durand, Robert B. & Watson, John, 2009. "The value relevance and reliability of reported goodwill and identifiable intangible assets," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 120-137.
    16. Guillaume Dumas & Isabelle Martinez, 2015. "IAS 38 et activation des dépenses de développement," Post-Print hal-03948373, HAL.
    17. Gaëlle Lenormand & Lionel Touchais, 2017. "The Financial Analysts' Forecasts And The Intangible: Do The Ias/Ifrs Lead To An Improvement? [Les Previsions Des Analystes Financiers Et Les Incorporels : Les Ias/Ifrs Apportent-Elles Une Ameliora," Post-Print hal-03125440, HAL.
    18. Gonçalves, Rute & Lopes, Patrícia & Craig, Russell, 2017. "Value relevance of biological assets under IFRS," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 118-126.
    19. Ahmed, Kamran & Chalmers, Keryn & Khlif, Hichem, 2013. "A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 173-217.
    20. Dong Xiang & Parmendra Sharma & Yuming Zhang, 2019. "The Global Financial Crisis, Fiscal Stimulus Package and the Chinese Banking Sector — A Pre- and Post-Efficiency Analysis," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-43, June.
    21. Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali & Liang, Shuang & Akbar, Saeed, 2013. "International Financial Reporting Standards and the value relevance of R&D expenditures: Pre and post IFRS analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 158-169.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4268-:d:361782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.