IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2359-d224466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends, Costs, and Benefits of Green Certification of Office Buildings: A Polish Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Edyta Plebankiewicz

    (Institute of Construction Management Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

  • Michał Juszczyk

    (Institute of Construction Management Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

  • Renata Kozik

    (Institute of Construction Management Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Green buildings may become the solution to the problem of high energy consumption, including those that are subject to verification by the relevant institutions issuing green certificates. The aim of the paper is an analysis and a brief discussion of trends related to the certification of office buildings in Poland. At the end of 2017, almost 9.7 million m 2 of modern office space was available in Poland, of which 62% was a certified area. This constitutes a five percent increase in the share of certified office space in relation to the total modern office space available during 2017. In order to compare the costs and benefits of certified buildings, the costs of an office building and a certified building were simulated. The comparison was made using the idea of costs in the life cycle and calculating the Life Cycle Cost. The difference between the base building and the green one was mainly based on obtaining higher Net Present Value with lower investment expenditures for the green building. There was also a clear difference between the beginning of investment profitability for the different levels of rent.

Suggested Citation

  • Edyta Plebankiewicz & Michał Juszczyk & Renata Kozik, 2019. "Trends, Costs, and Benefits of Green Certification of Office Buildings: A Polish Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2359-:d:224466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan Yigitcanlar & Md. Kamruzzaman & Suharto Teriman, 2015. "Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment: Evaluating Residential Development Sustainability in a Developing Country Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Alyami, Saleh. H. & Rezgui, Yacine & Kwan, Alan, 2013. "Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 43-54.
    3. Ke Fan & Edwin H. W. Chan & C. K. Chau, 2018. "Costs and Benefits of Implementing Green Building Economic Incentives: Case Study of a Gross Floor Area Concession Scheme in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Zuo, Jian & Zhao, Zhen-Yu, 2014. "Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 271-281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alena Tažiková & Zuzana Struková & Mária Kozlovská, 2023. "An Analysis of Real Site Operation Time in Construction of Residential Buildings in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Weimin Ma & Zitong Ren & Hua Ke, 2022. "Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Michal Gluszak & Agnieszka Malkowska & Bartłomiej Marona, 2021. "Green Building Adoption on Office Markets in Europe: An Empirical Investigation into LEED Certification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Ji-Wei Zhu & Li-Nan Zhou & Liang Li & Wajhat Ali, 2020. "Decision Simulation of Construction Project Delivery System under the Sustainable Construction Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Odey Alshboul & Ali Shehadeh & Ghassan Almasabha & Ali Saeed Almuflih, 2022. "Extreme Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Enrico Sicignano & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Anna Stabile, 2019. "Quali—A Quantitative Environmental Assessment Method According to Italian CAM, for the Sustainable Design of Urban Neighbourhoods in Mediterranean Climatic Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Redouan Assadiki & Gérard Merlin & Hervé Boileau & Catherine Buhé & Fouzi Belmir, 2022. "Status and Prospects of Green Building in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region with a Focus on the Moroccan Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Guangdong Wu , & Kaifeng Duan & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Daizhong Tang, 2017. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Public Rental Housing Community Based on a Hybrid Method of AHP-Entropy Weight and Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Shen, Yuxuan & Pan, Yue, 2023. "BIM-supported automatic energy performance analysis for green building design using explainable machine learning and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    4. Fernando, Yudi & Hor, Wei Lin, 2017. "Impacts of energy management practices on energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction: A survey of malaysian manufacturing firms," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 62-73.
    5. Mohammad S. M. Almulhim & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2020. "A Resilience and Environmentally Sustainable Assessment Framework (RESAF) for Domestic Building Materials in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Rashidi, Hamidreza & GhaffarianHoseini, Ali & GhaffarianHoseini, Amirhosein & Nik Sulaiman, Nik Meriam & Tookey, John & Hashim, Nur Awanis, 2015. "Application of wastewater treatment in sustainable design of green built environments: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 845-856.
    7. Madad, A. & Gharagozlou, A. & Majedi, H. & Monavari, S.M., 2019. "A quantitative representation of the urban green building model, focusing on local climatic factors by utilizing monetary valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 61-72.
    8. Zhang, Li & Wu, Jing & Liu, Hongyu, 2018. "Policies to enhance the drivers of green housing development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 225-235.
    9. Kong, Minjin & Lee, Minhyun & Kang, Hyuna & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "Development of a framework for evaluating the contents and usability of the building life cycle assessment tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Kim, Rakhyun & Tae, Sungho & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Development of low carbon durability design for green apartment buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 263-272.
    11. Melita Rozman Cafuta, 2015. "Open Space Evaluation Methodology and Three Dimensional Evaluation Model as a Base for Sustainable Development Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    13. Ferrari, S. & Zoghi, M. & Blázquez, T. & Dall’O’, G., 2022. "Towards worldwide application of neighborhood sustainability assessments: A systematic review on realized case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Ruparathna, Rajeev & Hewage, Kasun & Sadiq, Rehan, 2016. "Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1032-1045.
    15. Shaopei Chen & Dachang Zhuang, 2020. "Evolution and Evaluation of the Guangzhou Metro Network Topology Based on an Integration of Complex Network Analysis and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Wang, Tao & Seo, Seongwon & Liao, Pin-Chao & Fang, Dongping, 2016. "GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 484-493.
    17. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    18. Xu Zhang & Xiaoxing Liu & Jianqin Hang & Dengbao Yao & Guangping Shi, 2016. "Do Urban Rail Transit Facilities Affect Housing Prices? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Ahmed, Wahhaj & Asif, Muhammad, 2021. "A critical review of energy retrofitting trends in residential buildings with particular focus on the GCC countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Francesco Lolli & Antonio Maria Coruzzolo & Samuele Marinello & Asia Traini & Rita Gamberini, 2022. "A Bibliographic Analysis of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) in Industrial Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2359-:d:224466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.