IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2277-d223077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Holistic Overview of Qatar’s (Built) Cultural Heritage; Towards an Integrated Sustainable Conservation Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Fodil Fadli

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Mahmoud AlSaeed

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

Abstract

Historic urban cores are the backbone of a city’s cultural identity. Maintaining and preserving the socio-cultural, environmental and economic characteristics of the built heritage is vital for cultural identity survival. The Gulf region gathered important architectural and urban richness observed through the massive military towers, mosques, houses, palaces and grand souks. The state of Qatar is under huge pressure to preserve its cultural identity, which resulted from the rapid development, population growth, urban expansion and economic boom since the 1970s. The cities of Qatar are facing difficult challenges to preserve the cultural identity and built heritage without compromising the need for development. Consequently, this study aims to define a set of heritage restoration-preservation tools and an integrated sustainable conservation strategy as part of deliberate planning and design processes. This, certainly, will help achieve sustainable future scenarios for the survival of vernacular architecture and historic buildings in Qatar through their sustained adaptive (re)use.

Suggested Citation

  • Fodil Fadli & Mahmoud AlSaeed, 2019. "A Holistic Overview of Qatar’s (Built) Cultural Heritage; Towards an Integrated Sustainable Conservation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2277-:d:223077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alastair Adair & James Berry & Norman E. Hutchison & Stanley McGreal, 2006. "Attracting Institutional Investment Into Regeneration: Necessary Conditions For Effective Funding," ERES eres2006_102, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. John Elkington, 2006. "Governance for Sustainability," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 522-529, November.
    3. Djamel Boussaa, 2017. "Urban Regeneration and the Search for Identity in Historic Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Timothy Dixon & David Adams, 2008. "Housing Supply and Brownfield Regeneration in a post-Barker World: Is There Enough Brownfield Land in England and Scotland?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(1), pages 115-139, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asmaa AL-Mohannadi & Raffaello Furlan & Mark David Major, 2020. "A Cultural Heritage Framework for Preserving Qatari Vernacular Domestic Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    2. Iveta Šimberová & Alena Kocmanová, 2012. "Corporate governance - research of key indicators on market of processing industry in the Czech Republic via cluster analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 359-368.
    3. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    4. Swiatkiewicz Olgierd, 2017. "Linking Csr To Strategy: A Practical View," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 299-316, October.
    5. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    6. Xudong Yang & Honglei Cui & Chen Chen, 2022. "Bird Flight Resistance Analysis and Planning Strategies in Urban Regeneration Areas: A Case Study of a Certain Area in Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2024. "Financial Sustainability: Exploring the Influence of the Triple Bottom Line Economic Dimension on Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Windsor, Duane, 2009. "Tightening corporate governance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 306-316, September.
    9. Gian Luca Casali & Mirko Perano & Andrea Moretta Tartaglione & Roxanne Zolin, 2018. "How Business Idea Fit Affects Sustainability and Creates Opportunities for Value Co-Creation in Nascent Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Dima Jamali & Asem M. Safieddine & Myriam Rabbath, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 443-459, September.
    11. Lynn Buckley, 2022. "The foundations of governance: implications of entity theory for directors’ duties and corporate sustainability," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(1), pages 29-53, March.
    12. Samuele Maccioni & Francesca d’Angella & Manuela De Carlo & Bruno Sfogliarini, 2024. "Stakeholder Engagement and Triggers for Sustainable Development in Complex Fragile Ecosystems: Evidence from Alpine Trentino Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Norma Laura Godínez Reyes & Rodrigo Gómez Monge & Argelia Calderón Gutiérrez & Gerardo Gabriel Alfaro Calderón, 2022. "Efficiency Analysis of Mexican Stock Exchange Sustainable Firms," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, Enero - M.
    14. Sophia Xiaoxia Duan & Santoso Wibowo & Josephine Chong, 2021. "A Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Agriculture Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Agribusiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Paul Ziek, 2009. "Making sense of CSR communication," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 137-145, May.
    16. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    17. Gangi, Francesco & Meles, Antonio & Monferrà, Stefano & Mustilli, Mario, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    18. Muhammad Azam Roomi & José Manuel Saiz-Alvarez & Alicia Coduras, 2021. "Measuring Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Eco-Innovation: A Methodological Proposal for the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Chee Kwong Lau, 2019. "The economic consequences of business sustainability initiatives," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 937-970, December.
    20. Muzhar Javed & Muhammad Waheed Akhtar & Mudassir Husnain & Rabnawaz Lodhi & Sonia Emaan, 2020. "A stakeholder‐centric paradigm bids well for the “business case” ‐ An investigation through moderated‐mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2563-2577, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2277-:d:223077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.