IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p2084-d220831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision-Making Algorithm for Maritime Search and Rescue Plan

Author

Listed:
  • Donatien Agbissoh OTOTE

    (College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qianwangang Road, Huangdao Zone, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Benshuai Li

    (College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qianwangang Road, Huangdao Zone, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Bo Ai

    (College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qianwangang Road, Huangdao Zone, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Song Gao

    (North China Sea Marine Forecasting Center of State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Jing Xu

    (College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qianwangang Road, Huangdao Zone, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Xiaoying Chen

    (Hubei Provincial Information Center, No.17, Fruit Lake East 1st Road, Wuchang Zone, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Guannan Lv

    (College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qianwangang Road, Huangdao Zone, Qingdao 266590, China
    Qingdao Yuehai Information Service Co, Ltd., Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

With the development of the maritime economy, sea traffic is becoming more and more crowded, and sea accidents are also increasing. Research on maritime search and rescue decision-making technology cannot be delayed. This paper studies the maritime search and rescue decision algorithm, based on the optimal search theory. It also analyzes three important concepts: Probability of containment (POC), probability of detection (POD), and probability of success (POS) involved in the maritime search and rescue decision-making process. In this paper, the calculation methods of POC and POD variables have been improved, and the search success rate has been improved to some extent. Finally, an example analysis of the maritime search and rescue incident is given. Through verification, the algorithm proposed in this paper can support maritime search and rescue decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Donatien Agbissoh OTOTE & Benshuai Li & Bo Ai & Song Gao & Jing Xu & Xiaoying Chen & Guannan Lv, 2019. "A Decision-Making Algorithm for Maritime Search and Rescue Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2084-:d:220831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2084/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2084/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abi-Zeid, Irene & Frost, John R., 2005. "SARPlan: A decision support system for Canadian Search and Rescue Operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(3), pages 630-653, May.
    2. Henry R. Richardson & Joseph H. Discenza, 1980. "The United States Coast Guard Computer‐Assisted Search Planning system (CASP)," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 659-680, December.
    3. Bernard O. Koopman, 1957. "The Theory of Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(5), pages 613-626, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariusz Jacewicz & Marcin Żugaj & Robert Głębocki & Przemysław Bibik, 2022. "Quadrotor Model for Energy Consumption Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Yu-Meng Luo & Wei Liu & Xiao-Guang Yue & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "Sustainable Emergency Management Based on Intelligent Information Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-4, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Guo & Yanqing Ye & Qingqing Yang & Kewei Yang, 2019. "A Multi-Objective INLP Model of Sustainable Resource Allocation for Long-Range Maritime Search and Rescue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Garrec, Tristan, 2019. "Continuous patrolling and hiding games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 42-51.
    3. Ben Hermans & Roel Leus & Jannik Matuschke, 2022. "Exact and Approximation Algorithms for the Expanding Search Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 281-296, January.
    4. Joseph B. Kadane, 2015. "Optimal discrete search with technological choice," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 317-336, June.
    5. Ryusuke Hohzaki, 2009. "A cooperative game in search theory," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 264-278, April.
    6. Alan R. Washburn, 1998. "Branch and bound methods for a search problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 243-257, April.
    7. Joseph Kadane, 2015. "Optimal discrete search with technological choice," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 317-336, June.
    8. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    9. J. R. Weisinger & S. J. Benkoski, 1989. "Optimal layered search," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 43-60, February.
    10. Linda V. Green & Peter J. Kolesar, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Improving Emergency Responsiveness with Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(8), pages 1001-1014, August.
    11. Hohzaki, Ryusuke, 2007. "An inspection game with multiple inspectees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 894-906, May.
    12. Karatas, Mumtaz, 2021. "A dynamic multi-objective location-allocation model for search and rescue assets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 620-633.
    13. Kyle Y. Lin & Michael P. Atkinson & Kevin D. Glazebrook, 2014. "Optimal patrol to uncover threats in time when detection is imperfect," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(8), pages 557-576, December.
    14. Mumtaz Karatas & Nasuh Razi & Murat M. Gunal, 2017. "An ILP and simulation model to optimize search and rescue helicopter operations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(11), pages 1335-1351, November.
    15. Vasileios Kosmas & Michele Acciaro & Maria Besiou, 2022. "Saving migrants’ lives at sea: Improving search and rescue operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1872-1889, April.
    16. Sung-Won Cho & Jin-Hyoung Park & Hyun-Ji Park & Seongmin Kim, 2021. "Multi-UAV Coverage Path Planning Based on Hexagonal Grid Decomposition in Maritime Search and Rescue," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Hohzaki, Ryusuke & Iida, Koji, 2001. "Optimal ambushing search for a moving target," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 120-129, August.
    18. R B Van der Meer & J Quigley & J E Storbeck, 2005. "Using regression analysis to model the performance of UK Coastguard centres," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 630-641, June.
    19. Adel Guitouni & Hatem Masri, 2014. "An orienteering model for the search and rescue problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 459-473, October.
    20. Peter Kolesar & Kellen Leister & Daniel Stimpson & Ronald Woodaman, 2013. "A simple model of optimal clearance of improvised explosive devices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 451-468, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2084-:d:220831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.