IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1966-d219445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seasonal Net Carbon Exchange in Rotation Crops in the Temperate Climate of Central Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Ligita Baležentienė

    (Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų 11, Akademija, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Ovidijus Mikša

    (Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų 11, Akademija, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Tomas Baležentis

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, LT-03105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, LT-03105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Intelligent agricultural solutions require data on the environmental impacts of agriculture. In order for operationalize decision-making for sustainable agriculture, one needs to establish the corresponding datasets and protocols. Increasing anthropogenic CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere force the choice of growing crops aimed at mitigating climate change. For this reason, investigations of seasonal carbon exchange were carried out in 2013–2016 at the Training Farm of the Vytautas Magnus University (former Aleksandras Stulginskis University), Lithuania. This paper compares the carbon exchange rate for different crops, viz ., maize, ley, winter wheat, spring rapeseed and barley under conventional farming. This study focuses on the carbon exchange rate. We measure the emitted and absorbed CO 2 fluxes by applying the closed chamber method. The biomass measurement and leaf area index (LAI) calculations at different plant growth stages are used to evaluate carbon exchange in different agroecosystems. The differences in photosynthetically assimilated CO 2 rates were significantly impacted by the leaf area index ( p = 0.04) during the plant vegetation period. The significantly ( p = 0.02–0.05) strong correlation ( r = 0.6–0.7) exists between soil respiration and LAI. Soil respiration composed only 21% of the agroecosystem carbon exchange. Plant respiration ranged between 0.034 and 3.613 µmol m −2 s −1 during the vegetation period composed of a negligible ratio (mean 16%) of carbon exchange. Generally, respiration emissions were obviously recovered by the gross primary production ( GPP ) of crops. Therefore, the ecosystems were acting as an atmospheric CO 2 sink. Barley accumulated the lowest mean GPP 12.77 µmol m −2 s −1 . The highest mean GPP was determined for ley (14.28 µmol m −2 s −1 ) and maize (15.68 µmol m −2 s −1 ) due to the biggest LAI and particular bio-characteristics. Due to the highest NEP , the ley (12.66 µmol m −2 s −1 ) and maize (12.76 µmol m −2 s −1 ) agroecosystems sank the highest C from the atmosphere and, thus, they might be considered the most sustainable items between crops. Consequently, the appropriate choice of crops and their area in crop rotations may reduce CO 2 emissions and their impact on the environment and climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ligita Baležentienė & Ovidijus Mikša & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Seasonal Net Carbon Exchange in Rotation Crops in the Temperate Climate of Central Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1966-:d:219445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Ciais & Sébastien Gervois & N. Vuichard & S. L. Piao & N. Viovy, 2011. "Effects of land use change and management on the European cropland carbon balance," Post-Print hal-00716512, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Chen & Ningbo Cui & Yaowei Huang & Xiaotao Hu & Daozhi Gong & Yaosheng Wang & Min Lv & Shouzheng Jiang, 2021. "Investigating the Patterns and Controls of Ecosystem Light Use Efficiency with the Data from the Global Farmland Fluxdata Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Huang, Yuan & Yu, Qiang & Wang, Ruirui, 2021. "Driving factors and decoupling effect of carbon footprint pressure in China: Based on net primary production," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Chen, Jiandong & Fan, Wei & Li, Ding & Liu, Xin & Song, Malin, 2020. "Driving factors of global carbon footprint pressure: Based on vegetation carbon sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lo, Yueh-Hsin & Blanco, Juan A. & Canals, Rosa M. & González de Andrés, Ester & San Emeterio, Leticia & Imbert, J. Bosco & Castillo, Federico J., 2015. "Land use change effects on carbon and nitrogen stocks in the Pyrenees during the last 150 years: A modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 322-334.
    2. Lijuan Miao & Feng Zhu & Zhanli Sun & John C. Moore & Xuefeng Cui, 2016. "China’s Land-Use Changes during the Past 300 Years: A Historical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Zhou, Decheng & Zhao, Shuqing & Liu, Shuguang & Zhang, Liangxia, 2014. "Modeling the effects of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in the Loess Plateau: A case study with Ansai County, Shaanxi province, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 47-54.
    4. Guo, Ru & Zhao, Yaru & Shi, Yu & Li, Fengting & Hu, Jing & Yang, Haizhen, 2017. "Low carbon development and local sustainability from a carbon balance perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 270-279.
    5. Haiming Yan & Jinyan Zhan & Feng Wu & Huicai Yang, 2016. "Effects of Climate Change and LUCC on Terrestrial Biomass in the Lower Heihe River Basin during 2001–2010," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Xing, Wanqiu & Yang, Lilin & Wang, Weiguang & Yu, Zhongbo & Shao, Quanxi & Xu, Shiqin & Fu, Jianyu, 2023. "Environmental controls on carbon and water fluxes of a wheat-maize rotation cropland over the Huaibei Plain of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1966-:d:219445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.