IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1405-d211617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combination of Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets and PROMETHEE to Evaluate Meteorological Disaster Risk: Case Study of Southeastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobing Yu

    (School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Hong Chen

    (School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Zhonghui Ji

    (School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

The meteorological disasters have brought destructive damages all around the world in the past decades. These disasters have posed great threats to sustainable development. It is necessary to evaluate meteorological disaster risk to make corresponding emergency measures. The process is uncertain and fuzzy regarding the experts’ preferences. To deal with the problem, a novel evaluation approach based on PROMETHEE method and probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) is firstly proposed. First of all, PLTS is adopted to express preferences’ of experts. Then, the weights of criteria are obtained by the differential evolution (DE) algorithm, and steps of the method are proposed. Finally, the proposed method is used to evaluate the whole meteorological disaster risk in the southeast coastal areas of China and results have verified the effectiveness of the method. By comparing with some similar methods, results have demonstrated the advantages of the approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobing Yu & Hong Chen & Zhonghui Ji, 2019. "Combination of Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets and PROMETHEE to Evaluate Meteorological Disaster Risk: Case Study of Southeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1405-:d:211617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1405/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1405/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    2. Andreopoulou, Zacharoula & Koliouska, Christiana & Galariotis, Emilios & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2018. "Renewable energy sources: Using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 31-37.
    3. Jichuan Sheng, 2017. "Effect of Uncertainties in Estimated Carbon Reduction from Deforestation and Forest Degradation on Required Incentive Payments in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Wu, Yunna & Wang, Jing & Hu, Yong & Ke, Yiming & Li, Lingwenying, 2018. "An extended TODIM-PROMETHEE method for waste-to-energy plant site selection based on sustainability perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-16.
    5. Huchang Liao & Di Wu & Yulong Huang & Peijia Ren & Zeshui Xu & Mohit Verma, 2018. "Green Logistic Provider Selection with a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Thermodynamic Method Integrating Cumulative Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Zacharoula Andreopoulou & Christiana Koliouska & Emilios C. C Galariotis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2018. "Renewable energy sources: Using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities," Post-Print hal-02879860, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mei Cai & Yuanyuan Hong, 2022. "Improved TOPSIS Method Considering Fuzziness and Randomness in Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Huchang Liao & Xiaomei Mi & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 81-134, March.
    3. Junping Tian & Zheng Huo & Fengjiao Ma & Xing Gao & Yanbin Wu, 2019. "Application and Selection of Remediation Technology for OCPs-Contaminated Sites by Decision-Making Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    5. Zhi Wen & Huchang Liao & Ruxue Ren & Chunguang Bai & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Abdullah Al-Barakati, 2019. "Cold Chain Logistics Management of Medicine with an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Dražen Žgaljić & Edvard Tijan & Alen Jugović & Tanja Poletan Jugović, 2019. "Implementation of Sustainable Motorways of the Sea Services Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Croatian Port System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madjid Tavana & Akram Shaabani & Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga & Iman Raeesi Vanani, 2020. "A Review of Uncertain Decision-Making Methods in Energy Management Using Text Mining and Data Analytics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Du, Puliang & Zhou, Bo & Yang, Miaoheng, 2024. "Carbon emission reduction contribution analysis of electricity enterprises in urban green development: A quantum spherical fuzzy sets-based decision framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Marios Stanitsas & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Strategies for Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Ahmed Elkhatat & Shaheen Al-Muhtaseb, 2024. "Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Evangelos-Nikolaos D. Madias & Lambros T. Doulos & Panagiotis A. Kontaxis & Frangiskos V. Topalis, 2022. "Multicriteria decision aid analysis for the optimum performance of an ambient light sensor: methodology and case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1333-1361, April.
    8. Ana Paula Lopes & Nuria Rodriguez-Lopez, 2021. "A Decision Support Tool for Supplier Evaluation and Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Evangelos-Nikolaos D. Madias & Lambros T. Doulos & Panagiotis A. Kontaxis & Frangiskos V. Topalis, 2021. "A decision support system for techno-economic evaluation of indoor lighting systems with LED luminaires," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1403-1422, June.
    10. Zacharoula Andreopoulou & Christiana Koliouska, 2018. "Benchmarking Internet Promotion of Renewable Energy Enterprises: Is Sustainability Present?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Busso, Donatella & Yahiaoui, Dorra, 2022. "Towards agility in international high-tech SMEs: Exploring key drivers and main outcomes of dynamic capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Carayannis, Elias G. & Ferreira, João J.M. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2018. "MCDA in knowledge-based economies: Methodological developments and real world applications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-3.
    13. Ana Paula Lopes & Nuria Rodríguez-López, 2022. "Application of a Decision-Making Tool for Ranking Wellness Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Chmielarz Witold & Zborowski Marek, 2019. "On a comparative analysis of internet banking services by the conversion method and the scoring method," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 26-45, December.
    15. Pinto, Maria Cristina & Crespi, Giulia & Dell'Anna, Federico & Becchio, Cristina, 2023. "Combining energy dynamic simulation and multi-criteria analysis for supporting investment decisions on smart shading devices in office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    16. R. Krishankumar & K. S. Ravichandran & J. Premaladha & Samarjit Kar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2018. "A Decision Framework under a Linguistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set for Solving Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Wu, Yunna & Yong, Xingkai & Tao, Yao & Zhou, Jianli & He, Jiaming & Chen, Wenjun & Yang, Yingying, 2023. "Investment monitoring key points identification model of big science research infrastructures -- Fuzzy BWM-entropy-PROMETHEE Ⅱ method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Pratibha Rani & Jabir Ali & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "An Integrated Single-Valued Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution Methodology for Renewable Energy Resource Selection Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Christiana Koliouska & Zacharoula Andreopoulou, 2020. "A Multicriteria Approach for Assessing the Impact of ICT on EU Sustainable Regional Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Venkatraman Indrajayanthan & Nalin Kant Mohanty & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Lucian Mihet-Popa, 2022. "Investigation on Current and Prospective Energy Transition Scenarios in Indian Landscape Using Integrated SWOT-MCDA Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1405-:d:211617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.