IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1314-d210398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nature-based Tourism or Mass Tourism in Nature? Segmentation of Mountain Protected Area Visitors Using Self-Organizing Maps (SOM)

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Taczanowska

    (Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1190 Vienna, Austria)

  • Luis-Millán González

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Xavier García-Massó

    (Departament de Didàctica de l’Expressió Musical, Plàstica i Corporal, University of Valencia, 46021 Valencia, Spain)

  • Antoni Zięba

    (Tatra National Park, 34-500 Zakopane, Poland)

  • Christiane Brandenburg

    (Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1190 Vienna, Austria)

  • Andreas Muhar

    (Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1190 Vienna, Austria)

  • Maite Pellicer-Chenoll

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • José-Luis Toca-Herrera

    (Institute for Biophysics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Mountain protected areas play a fundamental role in the conservation of natural environment and at the same time provide the population with social benefits such as offering space for leisure and recreation. Understanding motivations and behavior of protected area visitors is crucial to effectively manage vulnerable areas. Our objective was to identify the profiles of visitors to a heavily used tourist destination—Kasprowy Wierch within the Tatra National Park (Poland), using the self-organizing maps (SOM) analytical method. In order to explore the socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics of the visitors a total sample of 2488 respondents were interviewed on site. Self-organizing map analysis is based on cerebral processes for managing and storing information in order to classify subjects and/or find relationships among variables. As a result, four heterogeneous tourist profiles were identified. Interestingly, two of these groups (Cluster 1 and Cluster 3), which were found to be the most challenging groups for management purposes, visited the national park for reasons other than its natural attractions. Especially, one sub-segment of Cluster 3 was mainly motivated by the possibility to use a cable car, admiring views and stayed within close proximity of the upper cable car station. Less than a half of visitors to Kasprowy Wierch (42%) were seeking a nature experience during their trip (Cluster 2 and Cluster 4). The results bring a new point of view in the discussion on visitor management within Kasprowy Wierch region, in particular by overlapping presented visitor segmentation with trip types and/or purchased cable car tickets. Within international context, we highlight the SOM technique as a valuable tool in profiling of tourists and underline the problem of the existence of mass tourism destinations within protected areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Taczanowska & Luis-Millán González & Xavier García-Massó & Antoni Zięba & Christiane Brandenburg & Andreas Muhar & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & José-Luis Toca-Herrera, 2019. "Nature-based Tourism or Mass Tourism in Nature? Segmentation of Mountain Protected Area Visitors Using Self-Organizing Maps (SOM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1314-:d:210398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Young-Su Kim & U-Yeol Park & Seoung-Wook Whang & Dong-Joon Ahn & Sangyong Kim, 2021. "Selection of Optimized Retaining Wall Technique Using Self-Organizing Maps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Marcelino Sánchez-Rivero & Juan de la Cruz Sánchez-Domínguez & Mª Cristina Rodríguez-Rangel, 2022. "Estimating the Probability of Visiting a Protected Natural Space and Its Conditioning Factors: The Case of the Monfragüe Biosphere Reserve (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Aiyshwariya Paulvannan Kanmani & Renee Obringer & Benjamin Rachunok & Roshanak Nateghi, 2020. "Assessing Global Environmental Sustainability Via an Unsupervised Clustering Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Sergei Mikhailov & Alexey Kashevnik, 2020. "Tourist Behaviour Analysis Based on Digital Pattern of Life—An Approach and Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Conrado Carrascosa-López & Wilmer Carvache-Franco, 2022. "Market Segmentation by Motivations in Ecotourism: Application in the Posets-Maladeta Natural Park, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco & Ana Gabriela Víquez-Paniagua & Orly Carvache-Franco & Allan Pérez-Orozco, 2021. "The Role of Motivations in the Segmentation of Ecotourism Destinations: A Study from Costa Rica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Òscar Saladié & Edgar Bustamante & Aaron Gutiérrez, 2021. "Growth of Rescues in Natural Areas during the First Summer of COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Renee Obringer & Dave D. White, 2023. "Leveraging Unsupervised Learning to Develop a Typology of Residential Water Users’ Attitudes Towards Conservation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 37-53, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1314-:d:210398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.